Court Approves $7.25 Billion Settlement of Antitrust Class Action Relating to Visa and MasterCard Interchange Fees

by Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

In the face of objections from some of the nation’s largest retailers, a New York federal judge has approved a massive settlement between a putative class of approximately 12 million merchants and Visa, MasterCard, and multiple banks over the issue of payment card interchange fees.  In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 05-md-01720 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2013).  The merchants contend that the defendants violated federal antitrust laws by implementing default interchange fees that effectively fix prices and by adopting rules that limit the ability of merchants to recoup these fees or steer consumers to lower-fee cards.  The case was settled for $7.25 billion and the imposition of certain injunctive relief.

Interchange fees are charged to merchants when a Visa or MasterCard branded card is used to make a purchase, and these fees are ultimately received by the card issuer.  In the absence of a specific agreement between a merchant and an issuing bank, the rules establish default interchange fee levels that may vary based on the type of card a consumer uses, with higher fees charged for certain “premium” or “rewards” cards.  Card network rules traditionally have also limited the ability of merchants to steer customers to less expensive cards.  Instead, these rules require merchants to honor all cards issued under the network’s brand (including those with higher fees), and prohibit merchants from discounting, surcharging, or taking other actions to steer customers to lower priced cards.  The overall result, according to the plaintiffs, constituted price fixing and otherwise restrained trade.

The settlement agreement provides for two cash funds totaling approximately $7.25 billion (which the court asserts is the largest cash settlement ever in an antitrust case) to be distributed to merchants after reduction for opt-outs and the payment of fees and expenses.  It also provides for certain prospective relief – notably the right of merchants to apply surcharges to recoup interchange fees.  Other provisions included a requirement that Visa and MasterCard negotiate interchange fees with merchant buying groups and that they permit merchants to decide whether to accept or not accept cards separately for each business owned by the merchant, provided that the businesses are operated under different trade names.  Some other provisions in the settlement agreement track remedies already agreed to by Visa and MasterCard in a suit brought by the government.1

Many members of the merchant class, including large retailers such as Wal-Mart and Target, objected to the settlement.  On the merits, they contended that the settlement will not fix the problems that initially led to the antitrust suit because it does not eliminate the default interchange rules or some of the other key rules attacked in the complaint.  The merchants also contended that surcharges are of limited value because (among other reasons) they are forbidden by law in 10 states and they remain forbidden for all merchants that accept cards that do not permit surcharging, like American Express.  The court rejected this argument primarily due to what it deemed the objectors’ lack of appreciation for the risks of taking the case to trial.  According to the court, the plaintiffs faced non-trivial issues in proving standing, class certification, and damages, as well as a substantial challenge in proving that various rules that arguably might be deemed procompetitive are, in fact, unlawful under the rule of reason.

Objecting merchants also opposed the settlement agreement’s release provision, which they argued effectively provides permanent immunity to Visa and MasterCard for the default interchange fees and the remaining anti-steering rules.  Some of these merchants particularly decried the fact that this release would apply even to those that opted out of the litigation under the provisions of Rule 23(b)(2), contending that this result denied the merchants their right of due process.  The court responded rather summarily, finding that the case was the proper subject of a Rule 23(b)(2) class because the selected relief effectively had to be granted as to all class members uniformly.

The approval of this settlement is not necessarily the final word on all of the relevant issues.  On the same day the court approved the settlement, several major retailer objectors filed notice of their intent to appeal.  Moreover, a group of consumers filed suit on December 16, seeking damages for violations of the Sherman Act against several of the bank defendants in the settled case.  Salveson et al. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al., Case No. 13-cv-05816 (N.D. Cal.).  The plaintiff consumers allege that the banks conspired to fix interchange fees through the default fees and card network rules, and that the alleged conspiracy has resulted in $54 billion in illegal charges per year to consumers.

1 In 2010, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice filed suit against Visa, MasterCard, and American Express relating to card company rules.  The case was settled through a consent decree that requires the card companies to permit merchants to provide customers with discounts (though not surcharges) based on the mode of payment and the brand and type of card.  The decree also permits merchants to communicate freely with customers concerning interchange fees and steer them toward less expensive cards.  See Final Judgment as to Defendants MasterCard International Incorporated and Visa, Inc., July 20, 2011, available at  American Express has not agreed to these remedies, and the lawsuit is continuing against that company.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.