Court of Appeal Holds That Employee Indemnification Statute Does Not Reach “First Party” Lawsuits

Allen Matkins
Contact

If you ask a corporate law attorney about indemnification of officers and other corporate agents, she will likely steer you to Corporations Code § 317. Ask an employment law attorney the same question, and she will likely refer you to Labor Code § 2802. In Nicholas Laboratories, LLC v. Chen, 4th Dist. Ct. Appeal Case No. G044105 (Oct. 12, 2011), both statutes were at issue.

Labor Code § 2802

Labor Code § 2802(a) codifies California’s strong public policy favoring indemnification (and defense) of employees by their employers:

An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee, at the time of obeying the directions, believed them to be unlawful.

In the dog days of the summer of 2000, Senator Liz Figueroa authored legislation to clarify that employees are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in enforcing this right. Stats. 2000, ch. 990.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide