Court of Chancery Explains MFW Requirements

Morris James LLP
Contact

Olenik v. Lodzinski, C.A. No. 2017-0414-JRS (Del. Ch. July 20, 2018)

Transactions between a Delaware company and its controlling stockholder usually are subject to rigorous entire fairness review.  But, under the MFW decision, even a merger with a controller may gain the benefit of deferential business judgment review.  The MFW requirements include that the controller must condition the procession of the transaction ab initio on approval by a special committee.

This Court of Chancery decision addresses, among other things, the critical issue of timing—when must the committee device be deployed to be effective under MFW.  The Court answers that question by distinguishing preliminary discussions from actual negotiations.  For purposes of the MFW analysis, “negotiations” usually begin when a proposal is made by one party which, if accepted by the counter-party, would constitute an agreement regarding the contemplated transaction.  Discussions may be fairly substantial before that point, but that does not mean the parties necessarily have taken themselves outside MFW.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide