Courts Have the Flexibility to Select Valuation Date in Cram Down Scenario; Fifth Circuit Remands to Bankruptcy Court for Re-valuation Based On Improper Deduction of Waived Fees

by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

The Bottom Line

The Fifth Circuit in Houston Sportsnet Finance, L.L.C. v. Houston Astros, L.L.C. (In re Houston Regional Sports Network, L.P.), 886 F.3d 523 (5th Cir. 2018), recently held that a bankruptcy court is not required to use either the petition date or the effective date for purposes of conducting a valuation in a cram-down Chapter 11 plan.  Rather, a bankruptcy court has the flexibility to select the valuation date so long as it takes into account the purpose of the valuation and the proposed use or disposition of the collateral at issue.

What Happened?

Houston Regional Sports Network, L.P. (the “Network”) entered into media-rights agreements with the Houston Astros and the Houston Rockets (together, the “Teams”), pursuant to which the Network was granted exclusive rights to broadcast games in exchange for fees.  The Network also entered into an Affiliation Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (“Comcast”) to carry the Network through 2032, in exchange for a monthly fee.  In 2010, a Comcast affiliate provided a loan to the Network, secured by a lien on substantially all of the Network’s tangible and intangible assets, including the Agreement but not the Teams’ media rights. In September 2013, various Comcast entities filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition against the Network after it had defaulted on consecutive payments to the Astros. 

Post-petition, AT&T and DirecTV entered into an agreement with the Teams to acquire all of the equity in the Network and enter into separate agreements to pay the Network for the right to broadcast the Network’s content. The sale agreement was included in the Network’s plan of reorganization (the “Plan”), which was confirmed in October 2014, under which the Teams agreed to waive approximately $107 million in media-rights fees owed by the Network that had accrued during the bankruptcy.

Prior to confirmation, Comcast made a 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b) election, which allows an undersecured creditor to elect to have its claim treated as fully, rather than partially, secured.  Because of this election, Comcast was guaranteed the right to receive a stream of payments, the present value of which was equal to the value of the collateral as determined by the bankruptcy court.  Comcast’s Section 1111(b) election applied only to the Network’s intangible collateral.  See 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b)(1)(B)(ii).  The bankruptcy court valued the intangible collateral by projecting the Network’s net income through 2032, discounting it to present value and then allocated that value among the intangible assets based on revenue generation.  Notably, the bankruptcy court’s valuation was as of the petition date and therefore took into account agreements that did not exist but could have been entered into postpetition.  The bankruptcy court then valued the Agreement as of the effective date of the Plan at $54.3 million, but deducted the $107 million in waived fees, which rendered the value of the intangible assets to be zero.  Since a creditor cannot make a Section 1111(b) election if the collateral is of “inconsequential value,” see 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b)(1)(B)(i), Comcast could not make a valid election. After the Plan was confirmed, Comcast appealed the bankruptcy court’s valuation of the Agreement and sought a stay pending appeal.  The district court denied the stay and affirmed the valuation, holding that the petition date was the proper date from which to value the Agreement and that expenses incurred by the Network were properly offset against the Agreement’s value. 

Comcast appealed to the Fifth Circuit.  Comcast advocated for the effective date of the Plan to be the valuation date, while the Teams argued for the petition date, relying upon In re Stembridge, 394 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2004). 

Under 11 U.S.C. § 506(a)(1), the value of a secured claim “shall be determined in light of the purpose of the valuation and of the proposed disposition or use of such property, and in conjunction with any hearing on such disposition or use or on a plan affecting such creditor’s interest.”  Here, the sale transaction was being implemented through the Plan.  The Fifth Circuit noted that Section 506(a) is often used in conjunction with the cram-down provision in Section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires valuation of the collateral in the context of plan confirmation when the debtor retains possession of the collateral.  The Fifth Circuit concluded that Section 1129(b)(2)(A)(i)(II)’s “fair and equitable” standard requires a discounting to present value, while Section 506 provides guidance to calculate the initial value before discounting. 

Rather than mandating a specific valuation date in the Chapter 11 cram-down context, the Fifth Circuit found that case law supports flexibility and Section 506(a) requires consideration of the purpose of the valuation and the proposed use or disposition of the collateral at issue.  On the other hand, the Third and Eighth Circuits have held that the confirmation or effective date of the plan is the appropriate valuation date for cram down, even though the Third Circuit recognized Section 506(a) valuations may not always relate to plan confirmation.

The Fifth Circuit stated that its prior decision in Stembridge did not compel a fixed valuation as of the date of the petition for Chapter 11 cram-downs as its holding there was limited to Section 1325 plan confirmations.  The court declined to extend the per se valuation date to Chapter 11 cram-downs, stating that Congress implicitly rejected such an extension by enacting Section 506(a)(2), which specifically refers to Chapter 7 and 13 bankruptcies but not Chapter 11.  The Fifth Circuit noted that a hard line need not be drawn for plan confirmation collateral valuation and a case-by-case analysis can be employed to determine the appropriate valuation date.  The Fifth Circuit cited involuntary bankruptcies (as occurred here) as an example of where a plan may not be filed on the petition date and therefore the use and disposition of the property is not yet established.

While the bankruptcy court had stated that under a flexible approach it would use the petition date to value the Agreement, the Fifth Circuit remanded for a re-valuation of the Agreement because it took issue with the bankruptcy court’s full deduction of the media-rights fees.  The Fifth Circuit found that the bankruptcy court improperly valued Comcast’s collateral based on fees that would never be paid because the Teams agreed to waive such fees under the Plan. Additionally, subtracting the media-rights fees, which were an administrative expense, constituted an impermissible surcharge.  The Fifth Circuit noted that while it had approved orders requiring payment of expenses incurred, it has never authorized charging a secured creditor for an expense that would never be paid under a reorganization plan.

Why This Case Is Interesting

The Fifth Circuit declined to adopt a bright-line rule for the appropriate valuation date for purposes of Chapter 11 cram-downs, instead following a flexible approach to the timing of valuation, allowing a court to consider the development of the proceedings since the value of the collateral may vary based on its proposed use under any given plan.  While this decision is in the context of a Chapter 11 cram-down, it may provide support for courts to apply a flexible approach to Section 506(a) valuations in other contexts as well.  Creditors considering whether to make a Section 1111(b) election should be aware that courts may apply a flexible approach to determine collateral value as opposed to a rigid application of one particular date.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.