DAMITT 2016 Year in Review: Significant Antitrust Merger Investigations Longer Than Ever; Deal Agreements Reflect Expected Delays

by Dechert LLP
Contact

Dechert LLP

 

Fast Facts

  • Significant merger investigations lasted an average of 9.9 months in 2016, a new DAMITT record.
  • The 33 significant investigations in 2016 were the second most in the past six years, but down from the record of 37 significant investigations set in 2015.
  • The six complaints filed in 2016 to enjoin transactions were the second most in the past six years, just below the 2015 record of seven complaints.
  • Merger cases filed in 2016 suggest that merger litigation takes about eight months—more than three months longer than litigated cases filed in 2015 and more than four months longer than litigated cases filed in 2011.
  • Transaction agreements resulting in significant antirust merger investigations resolved in 2016 allotted 15.7 months for antitrust review, up 10% from 2015.

2016 Sets New Record for Duration of Significant Investigations

According to the Dechert Antitrust Merger Investigation Timing Tracker (DAMITT), significant merger investigations concluded by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) during 2016 lasted an average of 9.9 months—a new record for the six years during which DAMITT has tracked the data. Significant merger investigations include Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act reportable transactions resulting in a closing statement, consent order, complaint challenging a transaction, or transaction abandonment for which the agencies take credit.

The 2016 record of 9.9 months is up only slightly from the 2015 average of 9.7 months, but is nearly 40% longer than the 7.1 month average recorded by DAMITT in each of 2011, 2012, and 2013. During 2016, relatively few significant investigations (6 out of 33) were shorter than this previous 7.1 month average. Overall, the median significant investigation lasted 9.7 months in 2016, slightly below the 9.9 month median in 2015, indicating that a smaller number of disproportionately longer investigations were responsible for driving up the average.

DOJ handled both the longest (Halliburton/Baker Hughes – 16.9 months) and shortest (BBA Aviation/Landmark Aviation – 4.4 months) significant investigations in 2016.

Average Duration of Significant U.S. Antitrust Merger Investigations (2011 - 2016)

Number of Significant Investigations and Complaints Filed Down Slightly from 2015 Levels

The 33 significant investigations resolved during 2016 fell short of the DAMITT record of 37 significant investigations set in 2015. However, the 33 significant investigations represented the second most in the six full years during which DAMITT has tracked the data. In addition, the six federal court complaints filed by the agencies to enjoin transactions following significant investigations were the second most in DAMITT’s six years of data, slightly behind the DAMITT record of seven complaints in 2015.

One interesting new trend in 2016 is that the antitrust agencies increasingly agreed to settlements that did not require asset divestitures. During 2016, five significant investigations resulting in a consent order did not require the divestiture of assets to resolve competitive concerns—a result that occurred only four times in the prior five years combined. It appears that as the agencies have been more willing to pursue novel theories of competitive effects, they have also become more accepting of non-structural remedies.

For only the second time in the six years DAMITT has been tracking significant antitrust merger investigations, the agencies issued no closing statements in 2016, an unfortunate reduction in a form of transparency that has provided useful guidance in the past.

Significant U.S. Antitrust Merger Investigations (2011 - 2016)

Divestiture Consents Require Upfront Buyers

The agencies continued to make heavy use of upfront buyer requirements in divestiture consent orders in 2016. The percentage of divestiture consent orders requiring upfront buyers was 86% in 2016, essentially unchanged from 2014-15 but up sharply from 43% over the 2011-13 period, when the average significant merger investigation lasted 7.1 months.

When an upfront buyer is required, before the merging parties can consummate their transaction, they must find a willing and able buyer, negotiate a purchase agreement with that buyer for the divested assets, and present that purchase agreement, the buyer’s business plan, and other information to the agency as part of the approval process. This process can add significant time to the investigation. Over the past two years, consents requiring upfront buyers lasted 2.9 months longer than consents permitting the merging parties to find and negotiate with divestiture buyers after consummating their transaction.

Upfront vs. Post-Order Buyer Trend (2011 - 2016)

DAMITT: Antitrust Merger Litigation is Taking Longer, Too

In addition to investigations taking longer, antitrust merger litigation also took longer in 2016 than in previous years. The agencies filed six complaints in 2016, three of which have scheduling orders and have proceeded or are currently expected to proceed to trial. Data for these three cases suggest that merger litigation continues to lengthen the time to closing for antitrust-sensitive transactions. The average time between the complaint and the first day of trial for these three 2016 cases is 179 days, and the average trial length is 34 days. By comparison, cases filed in 2015 took an average of 100 days to get to trial and an average of 12 days to try the case, both figures representing sharp increases from the last batch of HSR-reportable, litigated merger cases, which were filed in 2011. The 2016 cases have added more than three months to the timeline for litigated merger cases as compared to cases brought in 2015 and more than four months as compared to cases brought in 2011. These statistics suggest that while the length of significant merger investigations may be stabilizing, merging parties contemplating litigation options need to also consider that the duration of merger litigation is increasing at a higher rate.

Time to Litigate Government Antitrust Merger Challenges (Complaints Filed: 2011, 2015 and 2016)

Companies Responded to Increased Investigation, Litigation Durations with Extended Termination Dates

DAMITT’s analysis of publicly available transaction agreements shows that merging parties are allotting more time for antitrust investigations. The average time period from deal announcement to the final termination date in transaction agreements among parties involved in significant merger investigations was 15.7 months in 2016, up from 14.3 months in 2015. As displayed in the charts below, the data also show a tighter distribution of termination date durations in 2016 compared to 2015, with fewer parties taking aggressive timelines. These trends suggest that companies are adjusting the termination periods in their transaction agreements in response to the increased duration of significant merger investigations and litigations.

Time from Announcement to Final Termination Date (Months)
Significant Antitrust Merger Investigations in 2015

Time from Announcement to Final Termination Date (Months)
Significant Antitrust Merger Investigations in 2016

Conclusion

Although merger enforcement was down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015, the duration of significant merger investigations and subsequent litigation continues to trend upward to record levels. While the circumstances of antitrust-sensitive transactions may lead to results above or below DAMITT averages, parties to the hypothetical average deal would have to plan on ten months for the agencies to investigate a transaction and another eight months if they want to preserve their right to litigate an adverse agency decision, and perhaps even longer if the current trends toward longer investigations and litigations continue. Publicly available transaction agreements show the merger market may be adjusting to this expected delay with termination dates further out in time. DAMITT will continue to track these trends in 2017 to measure the impact, if any, of antitrust agency changes under President Trump.

Join Dechert Partners Paul T. Denis and Michael L. Weiner for a January 25 Webinar
DAMITT 2016 Recap - How long does it take for a U.S. merger investigation?

Written by:

Dechert LLP
Contact
more
less

Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.