Damming the Funding to North Korea: Anticipatory Seizure Warrants as a Tool to Enforce Sanctions and Thwart Money Laundering Transfers

by Ballard Spahr LLP

Two days after North Korea’s successful long-range ballistic missile test, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia unsealed a memorandum opinion which granted the Department of Justice “damming” warrants to seize all funds in bank accounts belonging to five Chinese companies which allegedly were used to hide transactions with North Korea using U.S. currency in violation of U.S. sanctions and money laundering laws. The underlying conduct allegedly resulted in over $700 million of prohibited transactions being processed by eight international banks. The opinion is noteworthy not only because it demonstrates the important relationship between money laundering laws and foreign policy, but also for the government’s use of anticipatory warrants to seize the assets upon arrival to the targeted accounts, and to prevent those assets from exiting.

The opinion reveals that the DOJ applied for eight damming warrants for the seizure of all funds into and out of correspondent bank accounts belonging to Dandong Zhicheng Metallic Material Co. Ltd. and four related front companies (known as “the Chi Yupeng Network,” named for the majority shareholder of Dangdon Zhicheng).   Reportedly, in 2013 Dangdon Zhicheng represented at an industry conference in China that it imported 1.8 million tons of North Korean anthracite coal, worth approximately $250 million, making the company one of the largest suppliers of North Korean coal to major steel producers in China.

The government alleged the companies purchased coal from North Korea with U.S. currency using various obfuscations tactics. The front companies allegedly engage in these transactions “in support of purchases ultimately benefitting sanctioned North Korean end users, including the North Korea military and North Korea weapons programs.” These allegations were corroborated by two North Korean defectors, deemed to be reliable, who described that “Kim Jong-un puts over 95% of North Korea’s foreign currency earnings generated from coal exports toward the advancement of . . . North Korea’s military and North Korea’s nuclear missiles and weapons programs.”

The proposed seizure warrants targeted funds originating at offshore U.S. Dollar accounts which are routed through correspondent accounts maintained at eight banks in the United States. Prosecutors represented that the grand jury subpoena returns from the banks indicated that each bank transacted over $20 million for the Chi Yupeng Network between 2009 and present, for a total of an estimated $700 million processed for the entities with links to North Korea. Nothing in the court filings indicates that any of the banks knowingly violated the U.S. sanctions against North Korea.

The government requested eight so-called “damming” warrants, which prosecutors described as warrants that place “a metaphorical dam at the financial institution in question to catch all incoming funds during the 14-day time period of the warrant, while preventing any funds from exiting the financial institution.” Following the expiration of the 14-day period the warrant directs the financial institution to immediately effect the seizure of any property collected during the time period and tender the property to law enforcement.

The warrant applications were originally denied by a magistrate judge in April 2017. The magistrate judge ruled the court lacked authority to issue the damming warrants pursuant to the federal rules because (i) such warrants were not contemplated by the statute or the rules; and (ii) the target funds were not currently located in the United States nor were they located in an interbank account.

The legal issue the court was grappling with is the propriety of anticipatory seizure warrants pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 and the Constitution.   The Supreme Court addressed this very question in United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2016). The Court defined an anticipatory search warrant as a “warrant based upon an affidavit showing probable cause that at some future time (but not presently) certain evidence of a crime will be located at a specific place.” Id. at 93. The Court found such warrants are not per se unlawful, but unlike conventional warrants anticipatory warrants require two probable cause showings: “[i]t must first be true not only that if the triggering condition occurs, ‘there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place,’ but also that there is probable cause to believe the triggering condition will occur.Id. at 96.

Applying the Grubbs reasoning to the forfeiture context, the District Court held that seizure warrants may authorize the seizure of items (or funds) not then present so long as there is probable cause to believe both that the items will also be present and that a crime for which forfeiture is appropriate has occurred.

The District Court found the government’s affidavit readily established probable cause to believe the triggering event – an attempt to deposit or withdraw funds into the accounts at issue – would occur. The government affidavit described that the eight banks collectively had processed more than $700 million from January 2009 to present, including collectively processing more than $52 million in the past seven months.” In addition, there was probable cause to believe that a crime warranting forfeiture of the target funds had occurred, as the affidavit described in 80 pages of detail how the Chi Yupeng Network engages in transactions designed to conceal the true origin and designation of funds routed through the U.S. correspondent banks and are consistent with generalized patterns of North Korean money laundering identified by defectors and other sources. The affidavit further described that the majority owner and manager of Dandong Zhecheng, the main company associated with the Chi Yupeng Network, utilizes U.S. dollar accounts in the names of their employees and at least one relative for the transactions. Therefore, the District Court found probable cause to believe that funds routed through U.S. correspondent by the Chi Yupeng Network are subject to forfeiture based on violations of the money laundering statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(c)(7)(A), the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1705(a), and the North Korean Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016, 22 U.S.C. § 9201, et. seq. On May 22, 2017 the District Court issued the eight warrants for seizure of accounts held by the Chi Yupeng Network.

Although the results of the seizure are not known, the anticipatory warrants seem to be a particularly apt tool for freezing out funding by prohibited actors and enforcing U.S. sanctions.   The government is likely to use this tactic going forward to chill unwanted transactions and enforce money laundering laws.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.