Decoding Tokenisation: An introduction

In the rapidly expanding and evolving digital economy, tokenisation is primed to transform how we interact with assets. By creating digital representations of real-world assets on a distributed ledger, tokenisation promises to enhance efficiency, transparency and liquidity across various markets and sectors. With recent estimates projecting that the tokenisation of real-world assets is set to reach US$18.9 trillion by 2033, one question looms large: what exactly is tokenisation and how is it shaping the future?

What are digital tokens and what does tokenisation really mean?

Tokens can be used to represent anything. Tokens are legal representations of a share of an asset, a set of permissions or a set of claims that are owned or controlled by the token bearer. Historically, tokens are physical items, for example a lottery ticket or a casino chip. The advancement of information technology and the internet has enabled digital tokens. Over time, tokens have become increasingly digitised, operating as packets of data that represent either a physical asset (eg, fractional ownership of real estate), permissions (eg, the right to a discount for goods or services on an online platform) or claims (eg, electronic representation of a debt).

Traditionally, digital tokens are issued and maintained ledgers or databases controlled by a central entity, for example bank deposits in a commercial bank. Whilst these systems may be more efficient in isolated controlled networks, token holders are obligated to trust that the centralised controlling entity and network will allow the token holder to claim the benefit or the property associated with the token when and where required. A lack of interoperability between different centralised ledgers or databases demands multi-layered infrastructure operated by a variety of intermediaries, complicating token activity, including transactions or claims.

Distributed ledger or blockchain technology enables digital tokenisation without these challenges, by disintermediating and decentralising token maintenance and activity, This enables users to claim their assets or benefits more effectively, removes trust barriers, and consolidates information technology infrastructure into a single network layer, which enhances efficiency and reduces costs.

Industry, governments, central banks and regulators are exploring and implementing the tokenisation of many categories of assets including:

  • financial assets (eg, securities, financial products, funds and commodities);
  • real estate;
  • environment social governance related assets (eg, carbon and biodiversity credits);
  • digital identity and data;
  • money (eg, central bank digital currencies and tokenised deposits); and
  • entertainment, collectibles and consumer goods (e.g. art, luxury goods, in-game assets and virtual goods).

The tokenisation of the above-mentioned ‘real-world assets’ (RWA) is now being piloted and developed by organisations across the globe.

What does the tokenisation process entail?

Tokenisation of RWA promises to modernise the process of funding, trading and managing assets. Tokenisation of RWA is the process of generating digital representations that record claims on traditional, real or financial assets in the form of cryptographic digital tokens on a programmable platform, typically a distributed ledger or blockchain. The tokenisation process occurs through ‘ramps’ or platforms, which apply the necessary computational transformations from traditional systems architecture and ledgers to the distributed ledger or blockchain. This typically occurs by locking assets in the platform of origin as collateral for the tokens issued on the distributed ledger or blockchain. This is achieved using smart contracts, which are computer programs that are stored on and interact with distributed ledgers that automatically execute upon satisfaction of pre-determined conditions.

Tokenisation involves three key elements:

  • assets: the underlying, tangible or intangible resources which may or may not possess inherent economic value and are owned or controlled by individuals or organisations;
  • ledgers: the record of information about ownership and transfer; and
  • tokens: the digital assets created through distributed, programmable ledgers and smart contracts.

There are structural differences between traditional and distributed (or programmable) ledgers in recording and transacting assets.

Traditional ledgers use two segregated components:

  • the database layer which stores records of assets; and
  • the application layer which incorporates centralised logic and rules and manages the recording, updating and deletion of assets on the ledger.

Tokens and distributed ledgers combine a core and service layer (similar to the two traditional layers mentioned above). The core layer contains the identifying information to define the asset and its owner (eg, ERC-20 standard with data such as name, owner and number of tokens). The service layer specifies the rules and logic governing the use (eg, in smart contracts).

What are some of the characteristics and benefits of tokenisation?

The following table expands on the above characteristics of tokenised assets, detailing its key benefits, namely enhanced efficiency, transparency and versatility when compared to traditional assets.

Paper-based assets Electronic assets Tokenised assets
  • Geographically limited
  • Manual serving required
  • Lack of transparency
  • Record keeping is kept separate from transaction network
  • Complex systems of intermediaries
  • Significant settlement delays
  • Atomic settlement
  • Automated workflows
  • Composable and programmable
  • Unlocks new markets
  • Enhanced data privacy
  • Greater access to all investors
  • Increased transparency
  • More seamless fractionalisation
  • Unlock hidden liquidity

The following table expands on the above characteristics of tokenised assets, detailing its key benefits, namely enhanced efficiency, transparency and versatility when compared to traditional assets.

Benefit

Description

Enhanced Efficiency and Lower Costs

  • Integrating the recording of assets and transaction validation, enables a single transaction process through smart contracts.
  • A single process permits customisable tokens for specific transactions without changes to the rules of the platform itself.
  • Using a decentralised ledger:
    • disintermediates asset transfers or claims (including in cross-border finance);
    • increases efficiency through automation (via smart contracts) and atomic settlement; and
    • enables new ways to transfer traditionally illiquid assets.
  • Inefficiencies such as instructing owners of siloed proprietary databases to initiate transfers (which likely use different standards, software and third-party messaging systems) are avoided with tokens and distributed ledgers.

Heightened Transparency

  • Distributed ledgers (particularly public blockchains) offer enhanced transparency which can promote effective regulatory compliance.
  • Regulations and laws can be encoded and automatically enforced in the distributed ledger or smart contracts.
  • More efficient dispute resolution as a result of the data integrity and auditability inherent to most distributed ledgers.

Unlocks Liquidity and Encourages New Markets

  • Unlock capital through fractional ownership, lowering barriers to investment and promoting access of retail investors to previously unaffordable asset classes.
  • Enables development of new hybrid financial products, combining the characteristics of traditional and digital assets.
  • Increased foreign capital flow enabled by distributed ledgers, accessible by investors globally.

What are the legal considerations for tokenising RWA?

Tokenisation, and distributed ledgers, are emerging technologies and accordingly, there is uncertainty about the application of laws and regulations to RWA in tokenised forms, for example whether stablecoins constitute ‘money’ or tokenised carbon credits are captured under carbon market regulations. In some cases, however, traditional regulatory scopes are wide enough to adequately cover the technological change and issuers of tokenised RWA will need to comply with extensive, well-established regimes. The following table explores some of the legal considerations for issuers and users of tokenised RWA.

Legal consideration

Description

Property rights

  • Legal uncertainty about the proprietary status of digital assets creates challenges in issuing and transacting in tokenised assets, as the property rights enforceable by token holders over the RWA is not always clear.
  • This also has implications and uncertainties for the treatment of such property for tax and insolvency proceedings.

Applying traditional regulations

  • Tokenised assets may attract the regulatory requirements for its traditional counterparts. International standards authorities such as the International Organisation of Securities Commissions assert the ‘same activities, same risks, same rules’ principle, which requires that digital assets that pose the same risks as their traditional counterparts require the same regulation.1
  • This may result in considerable disclosure, reporting, record keeping and general or conduct obligations applying to issuers or third-parties which deal in tokenised assets.

Geographical challenges

  • Challenges arise in enforcing legal and regulatory requirements or obligations to tokenisation activities (including both issuance and transaction functionality) where the parties operate in jurisdictions with light-touch regulation or a lack of cooperation agreements with local regulators.
  • The difficulties in defining the active jurisdiction of a public, distributed ledger where nodes that maintain the network are distributed globally, creates complexity for policymakers seeking to streamline regulation.

Settlement finality

  • Some decentralised systems struggle to guarantee settlement finality, in the traditional sense, given the possibility of network-driven hard forks, which can change transactions.
  • A distributed ledger employs economic incentives (e.g., penalties for dishonest participation in maintaining the network and voting for hard forks) to ensure that such events cannot occur without significant resources.
  • In practice, transactions are considered final after several block conformations because a large proportion of network validators have attested to the transaction.

Data protection on distributed ledgers

  • The heightened transparency of distributed ledgers, which enable any user to review transactions on-chain, creates novel challenges for regulations governing the usage, sharing and storage of data (e.g. the right to be forgotten in the General Data Protection Regulations in the European Union).
  • Consent management processes, data rights management, internal policies and reporting requirements are difficult to reconcile with public distributed ledgers.

Pseudonymity/Anonymity

  • In many distributed ledgers, parties to transactions or smart contracts are pseudonymous (or occasionally anonymous) which creates issues for enforceability and better enables certain illegal activity (e.g. obfuscating transaction data for money laundering).
  • Pseudonymity also facilitates some market manipulation techniques such as wash trading or front-running transactions in blocks.2

What next?

As we continue to explore the potential of tokenisation, it is clear that distributed ledger technology and digital assets hold promise for transforming the way we interact with RWA in the digital economy. However, widespread adoption will require careful navigation through a web of legal considerations arising from the novel characteristics of the technology. In future briefings, we will explore in greater detail these specific legal and regulatory considerations, and how the frameworks may respond to tokenised versions of traditional, regulated assets.


Footnotes

  1. The Treasury in the Regulating Digital Asset Platforms proposal paper adopted an adaption of this principle extending digital asset holding arrangements which resemble traditional asset custody arrangements into the Australian Financial Services Licensing regime.
  2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Regulatory Approaches to the Tokenisation of Assets (OECD Blockchain Policy Series, 2021).
 

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Written by:

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide