Did King.com Really “Trademark” the Word Candy?

by Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP

Much of the independent video game world is up in arms regarding the recent news that large UK game developer King.com has “trademarked” the word CANDY.  Many see this as an attempt by a Wonka-esque behemoth to grab control of a common word in order to crush its smaller competitors like some piece of common confectionary.  While there may be some truth to that thought, as is often the case when legal issues get picked up by the blogosphere and even mass media, there are also many misperceptions clouding the debate.  Because I feel that if I’m going to take a (short) break from playing CANDY CRUSH, I might as well write about it, I want to try to clear up some misconceptions.

First, King.com has not “trademarked” the word CANDY.  Most non-lawyers loosely use “trademark” as a verb to indicate that a person or company has obtained a federal trademark registration for a particular word, phrase or design.  King.com has not yet reached that point.  At the time of this writing, King.com merely has a pending U.S. application to register the word CANDY for a wide variety of goods and services. In other words, even using laymen’s terms, King.com has not yet “trademarked” the word CANDY in the U.S.

That being said, they have indeed successfully moved through the entirety of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s review procedure.  The USPTO has approved the application for “publication” (more on that later), meaning that the USPTO looked over the contents of the application and found nothing wrong with it and feels that the application is registrable without any changes.

This is upsetting to many people looking at this issue, especially smaller developers, who feel that no company should be able to “trademark” a common word like CANDY.  It’s not quite that simple.  A common word can indeed be the subject of valid trademark rights as long as it’s used on something unrelated to that word.  If I create a brand new kitchen cleaner and call it CANDY, I can indeed control exclusive rights to use that word for kitchen cleaners because anyone seeing a common but unusually utilized word like CANDY on a kitchen cleaner is bound to associate it with my product.

No, the problem isn’t that the word CANDY is a common word… it’s that it is descriptive as used in this context. Those who are upset are intrinsically keying in on a key aspect to trademark law: no one company can claim exclusive rights in a word that is otherwise generally used to describe the product or service that company is offering.  In this case, the main problem seems to be that King.com is trying to claim the exclusive right to use the word CANDY in the title of a game that is about… CANDY!!!  If they were able to do that, they wouldn’t be able to stop developers from making games about candy (which is completely permissible under intellectual property law) but they could stop them from using CANDY in the title of those games.

The problem is that the USPTO is supposed to reject any application for a mark made up solely of a descriptive word.  It appears to have dropped the ball in this case which could have happened for a few reasons.  First, King.com’s application doesn’t cover any candy products. In addition to games, the application covers a wide array of ridiculously irrelevant items such as “baby monitors,” “football boots” and, my personal favorite, “hosting social entertainment events, namely, karaoke parties for others.”  The USPTO just may not have thought to ask if any of those vast array of products and services had anything to do with candy.  Second, King.com’s application was filed on somewhat rare grounds in that it is based on a prior existing European registration King.com owns for CANDY. The Examiner reviewing it understood that it was already registered somewhere else and, thus, may not have analyzed it as vigorously as normal.

However, despite the fact that the USPTO may have let one slip by, even though King.com is indeed close to “trademarking” CANDY, they’re not quite there… and this last step is critical.  The application will soon move into a 30 day publication period. When an application is “published,” the USPTO is essentially telling the world “Hey world, we looked at this application and it looks okay to us so we’re about to register it… if you have any problem with that, now’s your time to let us know.”  In other words, for all those developers who are feeling helpless by this news, all is not lost. The application can still be blocked. Who can oppose it? “Any person who believes that he or she would be damaged by the registration of a mark on the Principal Register.” That’s a pretty broad description and is bound to include any developer who has released or plans to release a game involving candy who wants to use the descriptive word CANDY in the name.

In the meantime, developers are expressing concern that King.com is sending out cease and desist letters and sending takedown notices to app stores based on either its pending US application or existing European registration.  They’re feeling beat up upon and helpless. They are neither. The great thing about the law is that it’s not one sided.  If a developer receives a cease and desist letter and thinks it is baseless, the developer can always (a) ignore it; (b) respond explaining why it is baseless; or (c) respond in an incredibly snarky and aggressive tone as to why it’s baseless.  If a developer is the subject of a takedown notice on the app store, the particular app store should also give the developer an opportunity to respond and argue against the basis of the takedown.

Developers need to understand that, while an expensive, bloodsucking lawyer like yours truly may help in this process, we are not always necessary (you don’t need a lawyer to ignore a letter).  It all comes down to whether the pushing will ever come to shoving. For King.com to truly prevent developers from using the term CANDY, it would eventually have to file a trademark infringement suit based on the rights it believes it has. The question developers should ask is whether King.com would take that risk if its rights are shaky.  While it may have more money than the average independent developer, it is probably not all that likely to spend the money to file a losing lawsuit.

One final word of warning before I start sounding a little too much like a raging champion of the little guy while turning a blind eye to the plight of the powerful…  I’m confident that in many instances, King.com has indeed been injured by the myriad of CANDY CRUSH copycats that have sprung up. To the extent small developers are doing more than capitalizing on a craze and are taking steps to intentionally confuse consumers looking for CANDY CRUSH into buying the developer’s game instead, King.com has a very valid reason to be upset.  For whatever developers may say about the originality of the gameplay, King.com has done something to create an addictive and extremely popular game and should be able to prevent others from creating knockoffs that lead to consumer confusion.  Is registering CANDY the right way to do it? Probably not because it may be used to shut down more than the bad actors intentionally creating true confusion.  But it could be a desperate attempt by King.com to do something to curb those bad actors that are indeed out there.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.