District Court Stays Implementation of HUD’s 2020 Disparate Impact Rule

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC
Contact

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC

A Massachusetts Federal District Court recently stayed the implementation of HUD’s 2020 Disparate Impact Rule (2020 Rule), finding its changes to the 2013 version to be arbitrary and capricious.  The court also preliminarily enjoined HUD from implementing and enforcing the rule.

HUD published the 2020 Rule on September 24, 2020, and its effective date was October 26, 2020.  The plaintiffs filed their action four days after the rule was published seeking to vacate it.  On October 6, 2020, the plaintiffs also filed their motion for preliminary injunction to bar the implementation of the rule and to stay its effective date under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  HUD filed its opposition on October 14, 2020. 

The district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion on the grounds that HUD had not engaged in reasoned decision-making in connection with its changes to the 2013 Rule.  The court found that HUD’s attempt to implement the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Inclusive Communities, which recognized the theory of disparate impact liability, was arbitrary and capricious.  See Texas Dep’t of Hous. & Cmty. Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., 576 U.S. 519, 524 (2015).  The changes made it more difficult for plaintiffs to bring an action, but easier for defendants to defend against one.  The court also found HUD’s claims that the changes provided greater clarity to be arbitrary and capricious, siding with the plaintiffs who argued that the new and undefined terminology, altered burden-shifting framework, and new defenses did the opposite.

The court declined to address the plaintiff’s other arguments in support of their motion – the 2020 Rule was contrary to the law, and it violated the APA’s notice and comment requirements.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Weiner Brodsky Kider PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC
Contact
more
less

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.