Divorce In Washington – Cheating And Infidelity: Why Washington State Is A No Fault Divorce State

Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson PLLC

Too often, infidelity plays a role in the demise of a marriage. The spouse who was cheated on will likely (and understandably) be angry. But can that infidelity be used against the cheating spouse during your divorce? In Washington, the answer is no.

Washington is a “no-fault” State, meaning that the trial judge will not consider “marital misconduct” when you divorce. This may seem strange, and possibly unfair. Why shouldn’t he or she suffer some judicial repercussions for this act of betrayal? This question may be compounded when viewing how other States may approach accusations of infidelity—e.g., in North Carolina, a husband was recently awarded millions of dollars after suing his wife’s lover for their 16-month affair. But, to be clear, every State has some form of no-fault divorce.

So, why no fault? There are actually some good policy reasons. Here are just a few:

  1. Not having to litigate the issue of fault means that the other spouse cannot prevent the divorce from happening. Think about it—if you have to prove fault to get a divorce, and if the other spouse does not want to get divorced, then they could keep you from divorcing them by convincing a judge that there was insufficient fault to grant a divorce. The other spouse could argue that “there’s no fault, so there’s no legal basis for why we should get divorced.” In that sense, the no-fault position liberalized the idea of divorce; indeed, one of the major reasons States began passing no-fault laws was so that women trapped in unhappy marriages could freely divorce their husband without having to prove fault.
  2. Arguing over fault is antithetical to bedrock marital principles. Washington is a “Community Property” State. Succinctly, this means that all property and all debt accumulated over the course of a marriage—including income of both spouses—is presumed “community property” belonging to both spouses, and the trial judge must divide the property in a “just and equitable” manner. This notion is grounded in the idea that marriage is akin to a partnership; and, as partners, both spouses share in the property acquired during the marriage. Adding fault as a factor throws a wrench into this equation when it comes to allocating property upon divorce. Imagine the following argument: “I was only 30% at fault for the marriage failing, but she was 70% at fault; therefore, I should receive 70% of the property.” We do not want those types of decisions being made, especially given that “fault” is subjective by its very nature.
  3. Doing away with the issue of fault saves time and money. It also can keep tensions at bay, which undeniably is in the best interests of the children. Many divorces can be expensive and drawn out sagas, and this family law litigation is almost always emotionally charged. Arguing over fault will only intensify an already-difficult case. And again, you would have to prove fault before the judge could even consider issues of property division, spousal support (alimony), child support, etc.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson PLLC

Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.