Education Department: Protections for Absent Parties in Title IX Hearings will not be Enforced

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Contact

The U.S. Department of Education announced that it has ceased enforcement of one of the more controversial components of revised Title IX regulations implemented in August 2020. Specifically, the Department will not enforce a provision contained in the regulations that prevented Title IX hearing officers from relying upon statements that are not subject to cross-examination. (See 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(6)(i)).

The action by the Department comes in response to the recent decision in Victim Rights Law Center v. Cardona. In that decision, a Federal District Court judge reasoned that the referenced portion of the regulations were “arbitrary and capricious,” and could lead to inequitable outcomes when applied in a formal hearing process. The court voiced concern that the provision related to absent witnesses offers parties a potentially unjust shield that could be used to prevent relevant and necessary evidence from being made available within the context of a hearing.

In its August 24 announcement from Suzanne Goldberg, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, the Department noted that its action clears the way for a hearing officer to “consider statements made by the parties and witnesses during the investigation, and statements about the alleged sexual harassment that satisfy the regulation’s relevance rules, regardless of whether the parties or witnesses submit to cross-examination….”

This action helps to overcome the concern advanced by many higher education administrators that the restrictions related to absent witnesses could lead hearing officers to arrive at inequitable decisions due to their lack of access to critical evidentiary materials. This decision muddies the waters for hearing officers and institutional leaders, who will need to wrestle with new and complex issues surrounding the admissibility and relevance of specific evidentiary materials. For institutions, greater emphasis may need to be placed upon the training of hearing officers and procedures governing the consideration and admissibility of evidence.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Steptoe & Johnson PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Contact
more
less

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.