Employers Catch a Break: California Supreme Court Clarifies Meal and Rest Break Obligations

K&L Gates LLP
Contact

On April 12, 2012, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp., et al. v. Superior Court (“Brinker”). For California employers, the key holdings of this case regarding meal period and rest break issues with respect to non exempt employees are as follows:

1. Employers satisfy their meal period obligation if they relieve an employee of all work duties, relinquish control over activities and permit a reasonable opportunity to take an uninterrupted 30 minute break, and do not impede or discourage the employee from doing so. Employers are not obligated to police meal breaks or ensure no work is performed....

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

K&L Gates LLP
Contact
more
less

K&L Gates LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide