EPA and the Army Corps Issue Final Clean Water Rule, but Does This New “Line in the Water” Clarify, Expand or Narrow Clean Water Act Jurisdiction?

by K&L Gates LLP
Contact

Introduction

On May 27, 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) jointly released a final rule (the “Clean Water Rule”) redefining the scope of their shared jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). This rule comes after decades of uncertainty regarding the extent of federal authority over the nation’s waters. The proposed rule was released in March 2014.

The final rule provides some increased certainty regarding which types of waters are subject to agency jurisdiction. In some ways, the new rule arguably expands the agencies’ jurisdiction, while in others it may contract their jurisdiction. Notable aspects of the final rule include:

  • Allows the agencies to assert jurisdiction over all “tributaries” that contribute flow to other jurisdictional waters.
  • Allows the agencies to assert jurisdiction over all waters that are “adjacent” to other jurisdictional waters, and establishes distance limitations with respect to the concept of “adjacency.”
  • Provides a new definition of “significant nexus” that relies upon the evaluation of a defined list of aquatic “functions.”
  • Provides geographic limits on the agencies’ authority to assert jurisdiction over isolated waters using the “significant nexus” test.
  • Establishes jurisdictional exclusions for an expanded array of ditches and other artificially constructed waters.

However, in comparison to the agencies’ March 2014 proposed rule, the final rule may also represent a slightly more restricted (or at least more concretely defined) view of agency jurisdiction. For example, the final rule tightens the definition of a “tributary” to include only waters contributing flow to a jurisdictional water that also has a bed, banks, and ordinary high water mark (“OHWM”), as opposed to all waters the contribute flow, directly or indirectly, to a jurisdictional water. Further, the final rule also restricts what is considered an “adjacent” water to those within 100 feet of the OHWM, 1,500 feet of high tideline, or within the 100 year floodplain (if also within 1,500 feet of the OHWM) of a jurisdictional water. (Whether these specific distance limits are ‘restrictions’ or expansions is a matter of perspective).

This rule affects just about every major business, not to mention individuals, directly or indirectly. Those engaged in construction and land use activities will be directly impacted, as they are the ones likely required to obtain permits to conduct activities near questionably jurisdictional waters. Companies seeking to relocate their operations (retail, manufacturing, or otherwise) to new or different locations will also be impacted, as project scheduling, timing, and cost will be affected by the need to determine whether a permit is required (and, if necessary, to obtain a permit) to conduct activities in these areas (under the CWA, any person, not just permittee, is obligated to comply with the law). Investors would also be impacted, as the scope, timing, and risk to their investment - if it involves land use - would need to be adjusted to account for the expanded requirements and new permit requirements. Energy companies might be particularly impacted as their activities necessarily involve use of lands, be it for pipelines, utility poles, or staging areas. Cities and towns seeking to revitalize or develop areas that are not apparently connected to waters of the United States may need permits from the Corps for these newly covered areas.

Background

The CWA prohibits discharges of pollutants to “navigable waters,” and then defines “navigable waters” as “the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas.”[1] The agencies’ current rules defining “waters of the United States,” have not been substantively changed since the 1980’s. Many argue that these rules reflect the agencies’ historical practice of asserting jurisdiction over essentially all waters that the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause[2] would arguably permit, regardless of limits imposed by the CWA itself.[3]  The problem is these rules have been largely rendered obsolete by intervening court decisions. First, in Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc. v. United States (1985),[4] the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the Corps’ extension of its jurisdiction to a wetland which actually abutted a navigable water. Then, in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2001) (“SWANCC”), the Court held that the Corps had no jurisdiction over an abandoned sand and gravel pit merely because migratory (i.e., interstate) birds used the site as a habitat.[5] Lower courts struggled to discern the precedential rule from SWANCC,[6]leading the Supreme Court to address the scope of CWA jurisdiction for a third time in Rapanos v. United States (2006) (“Rapanos”).[7] While a majority of the Court could not agree on a single interpretive position, most commentators agree that the deciding vote belonged to Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who held that, in order for a wetland to be regulated under the CWA, it “must possess a ‘significant nexus’ to waters that are or were navigable in fact or that could reasonably be so made.”[8] A plurality opinion, signed by four of the Court’s justices, would have interpreted the CWA more narrowly to apply only to “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water” connected to traditional navigable waters, and to “wetlands with a continuous surface connection to” such relatively permanent waters.[9]

Since the Supreme Court’s decisions, both the EPA and the Corps have grappled with how to determine which waters have the requisite “significant nexus” to traditional navigable waters. The agencies’ controlling 2008 guidance[10] provided for jurisdiction, in all cases, over the following classes of waters:

  • Traditional navigable waters
  • Wetlands adjacent to traditional navigable waters
  • Non-navigable, but relatively permanent, tributaries of traditional navigable waters
  • Wetlands that directly abut such tributaries

Furthermore, the 2008 guidance directed agency personnel to assert jurisdiction, on a case-by-case basis, over other tributaries and adjacent wetlands if they were determined to have a “significant nexus” with traditional navigable waters. In determining whether a “significant nexus” exists, the agencies were to consider the flow and functions of the water in question in addition to all other “similarly situated” waters, meaning a tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands, as a single collective unit. The 2008 guidance also indicated that the agencies generally would not assert jurisdiction over certain categories of ditches, swales, and erosional features, but did not foreclose the possibility of doing so on a case-by-case basis.

The Proposed Rule

The agencies’ proposed Clean Water Rule, released in March 2014, would have provided the agencies with jurisdiction over an expanded array of smaller and more isolated waters without having to conduct a resource-intensive “significant nexus” analysis. Specifically, under the proposed rule, all “tributaries” and all waters “adjacent” to such tributaries would have been deemed categorically jurisdictional. Further, the proposed rule would have allowed EPA and the Corps to assert jurisdiction, on a case-by-case basis, over any other waterbody having the requisite “significant nexus” to other jurisdictional waters. The proposed rule provided a new, expanded definition of the term “significant nexus” that included a novel description of what it meant for waters to be “similarly situated,” requiring the agencies to determine whether waters in the same watershed were “sufficiently close together” to be evaluated as a “single landscape unit.”The proposed rule also would have codified the agencies’ policy of exempting certain types of artificial water features, ditches, groundwater, and gullies.

The Connectivity Report

In September 2013, prior to the release of the proposed rule, EPA released a draft report summarizing peer-reviewed scientific literature on the connectivity of streams and wetlands relative to large water bodies such as rivers, lakes, estuaries, and oceans (the “Draft Connectivity Report”).[11] The final connectivity report, titled “Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters,” (the “Final Connectivity Report”) was released in January 2015.[12] The Connectivity Report attempts to summarize the current scientific understanding about the connectivity and mechanisms by which streams and wetlands, singly or in the aggregate, affect the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of downstream waters. In relation to the Clean Water Rule, the Connectivity Report is intended to provide a scientific basis for the agencies’ assertion of jurisdiction using Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test. The report addresses the effect of: (1) ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams on downstream waters; (2) riparian or floodplain wetlands and open waters on downstream waters; and (3) wetlands and open waters in non-floodplain settings on downstream waters. The Final Connectivity Report sets forth the following five major conclusions:

  • Streams, regardless of their size of frequency of flow, are connected to downstream waters and strongly influence their function.
  • Wetlands and open waters in riparian areas and floodplains are physically, chemically, biologically integrated with rivers via functions that improve downstream water quality. These systems act as effective buffers to protect downstream waters from pollution and are essential components of river food webs.
  • Many wetlands and open waters located outside of riparian areas and floodplains, even when lacking surface water connections, provide physical, chemical, and biological functions that could affect the integrity of downstream waters. Evaluations of the connectivity and effects of individual wetlands or groups of wetlands are possible through case-by-case analysis.
  • Variations in the degree of connectivity are determined by the physical, chemical, and biological environment, and by human activities.
  • The incremental contributions of individual streams and wetlands are cumulative across entire watersheds, and their effects on downstream waters should be evaluated within the context of other streams and wetlands in that watershed.

The EPA’s proposed Clean Water Rule was released before the Draft Connectivity Report underwent mandatory peer review by EPA’s Scientific Advisory Board. Some questioned whether it was appropriate for EPA to base its proposed rule on the preliminary conclusions of the Draft Connectivity Report. EPA responded stating that the rulemaking would not be finalized until the publication of the Final Connectivity Report. However, many still question whether this was appropriate, given this essentially meant EPA took comment on its proposed Clean Water Rule before the connectivity report was finalized, and then finalized the Clean Water Rule based on a final assessment that was not yet available for public comment during the proposed rule’s comment period.

The Final Clean Water Rule

The Final Clean Water Rule was released on May 27, 2015. The agencies received over one million comments. Generally, the final rule provides some increased clarity with respect to scope of waters subject to agency jurisdiction, but in so doing may well expand the agencies’ jurisdiction in comparison to prior practice under the post-Rapanos 2008 guidance. The final rule recognizes three basic categories of waters: (1) waters that are categorically jurisdictional (i.e., jurisdictional in all instances); (2) waters that are subject to case-specific analysis to determine whether they are jurisdictional; and (3) waters that are specifically excluded from federal jurisdiction.

The final rule introduces several notable changes from prior agency practice under the 2008 guidance, including (1) the definition and treatment of tributaries; (2) the treatment of adjacent waters; (3) which waters will be analyzed on a ‘case-specific’ basis; and (4) the addition of several categorical exclusions.

Tributaries

The final rule establishes the definition of a ‘tributary’ and provides a water meeting the definition of a tributary is categorically jurisdictional. Under the new rule, a water is a tributary (and is therefore jurisdictional) if it is characterized by the presence of physical indicators of flow — bed, banks, and OHWM — and contributes flow directly or indirectly to a traditional navigable water, an interstate water, or the territorial seas.

Adjacent Waters

The final rule defines “adjacent” as bordering, contiguous, or neighboring. The final rule establishes a definition for “neighboring,” identifying three circumstances where a water would be “neighboring” and therefore jurisdictional: (1) waters located in whole or in part within 100 feet of the OHWM of a traditional navigable water, interstate water, the territorial seas, an impoundment of a jurisdictional water, or a tributary; (2) waters located in whole or in part in the 100-year floodplain and that are within 1,500 feet of the OHWM of a traditional navigable water, interstate water, the territorial seas, an impoundment, or a tributary; and (3) waters located in whole or in part within 1,500 feet of the high tideline of a traditional navigable water or the territorial seas and waters located within 1,500 feet of the OHWM of the Great Lakes. Under current practice, whether such areas are jurisdictional allowed potentially regulated parties to prove using the three party water/plant/soils test contained in the Corps’ wetlands delineation manual, to prove that an area, even if within 100 feet of the OHWM, was not jurisdictional. That will no longer be the case under the final rule.

Case-Specific Significant Nexus

The final rule identifies five specific types of waters in specific regions that, regardless of location, are subject to the ‘significant nexus’ analysis: (1) Prairie potholes; (2) Carolina and Delmarva bays; (3) pocosins; (4) western vernal pools in California; and (5) Texas coastal prairie wetlands. In addition, the final rule also provides other waters within the 100-year floodplain of a traditional navigable water, interstate water, or the territorial seas and waters within 4,000 feet of the high tideline or OHWM of a traditional navigable water, interstate water, the territorial seas, impoundments, or covered tributary are subject to case-specific significant nexus determinations. These limits should provide at least some regulatory certainty to regulated entities with respect to truly isolated waters, but in many areas, the 4,000 foot buffer will be broad enough to encompass entire regions.

The final rule also includes a new definition of “significant nexus,” requiring the agencies to assess a wide array of aquatic “functions” to determine whether or not a water has the requisite jurisdictional connection to a downstream water. The functions include (A) sediment trapping; (B) nutrient recycling; (C) pollutant trapping, transformation, filtering, and transport; (D) retention and attenuation of flood waters; (E) runoff storage; (F) contribution of flow; (G) export of organic matter; (H) export of food resources; and (I) provision of life cycle dependent aquatic habitat.

Categorical Exclusion

Finally, the final rule adds several types of categorical exclusions. Some have been excluded historically as a matter of policy, but this rule establishes their exclusion by rule for the first time. In addition, the final rule excludes from jurisdiction certain ditches that were not previously excluded, including ditches with ephemeral flow that are not a relocated tributary or excavated in a tributary, and ditches with intermittent flow that are not a relocated tributary, or excavated in a tributary, or drain wetlands. Further, the final rule adds exclusions for groundwater and erosional features, stormwater control features, and cooling ponds created in dry land, amongst others.


Subject[13]

2008 Guidance

Proposed Rule

Final Rule

Navigable Waters

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Interstate Waters

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Territorial Seas

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Impoundments

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Jurisdictional

Tributaries to the Traditionally Navigable Waters

Jurisdictional: Relatively permanent, non-navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters (“TNWs”).

Significant Nexus Analysis: Non-navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent.

Jurisdictional

Defines “tributary” as any water that contributes flow, directly or indirectly, to a jurisdictional water, including but not limited to those with a bed, banks, and OHWM.

Jurisdictional

Defines “tributary” as waters with a bed, banks, and OHWM that contribute flow to a jurisdictional water.

Adjacent Wetlands/Waters

Jurisdictional: All wetlands adjacent to TNWs; all wetlands directly abutting relatively permanent tributaries.

Significant Nexus Analysis: Wetlands adjacent to non-navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent; wetlands adjacent to but that do not directly abut a relatively permanent non-navigable tributary.

Jurisdictional

Defines “adjacent” as being within the riparian area or floodplain, or with a surface or shallow subsurface connection to, a jurisdictional water.

Jurisdictional

Defines “adjacent” as being within 100 feet of the OHWM, 1,500 feet of the high tide line, or within the 100 year floodplain (if also within 1,500 feet of the OHWM), of a jurisdictional water.

Isolated or “Other” Waters

Not addressed.

Subject to “significant nexus” analysis.

Includes as jurisdictional specific waters that are similarly situated (prairie potholes, Carolina & Delmarva bays, pocosins, western vernal pools in California, & Texas coastal prairie wetlands) if they have a significant nexus to jurisdictional waters.

Significant nexus analysis also applies to other waters within the 100-year floodplain or 4,000 feet of a jurisdictional water.

Exclusions to the definition of “Waters of the U.S.”

Swales or erosional features (e.g., gullies, small washes characterized by low volume, infrequent, or short duration flow); ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in an draining only uplands and that do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water.

Includes exclusions from the 2008 guidance plus several others.

Includes the proposed rule exclusions plus several others, including a broader exclusion for ditches and new exclusions for stormwater control features and wastewater recycling structures.

Conclusion

Whether this rule actually becomes effective is open to question. Currently, there is a bill in Congress which, if passed, would prevent the agencies from implementing the final rule. This bill has already passed the House and is currently pending at the Senate. Many observers believe the President will veto the bill, and it is unclear if the bill has sufficient votes to overcome the veto. Moreover, there are certainly going to be legal challenges to the final rule’s validity. While the Clean Water Rule provides increased certainty to an area of the law that has for too long confounded Congress, courts, state and federal agencies, and industry participants alike, it also makes it certain that areas not previously regulated will now be considered “waters of the United States.” Furthermore, the final rule may well reduce, but not eliminate, the number of instances where significant factual investigation and inquiry - “wetlands delineations” - are required to determine jurisdiction. Thus, from the perspective of the regulated community, the final rule is a mixed bag at best. All those potentially impacted by this rulemaking— including those in the construction, real estate, energy, agriculture, manufacturing and investment sectors, not to mention landowners and other individuals — should take appropriate steps to evaluate and protect their interests now that the final rule has been released. The final rule will go into effect 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. Once published, the final rule will be subject to legal challenge in federal court.

Notes:
[1] See 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1362(7), & 1362(12).

[2] U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3.

[3] See, e.g., 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a)(3) (extending jurisdiction to any “water … the use, degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce ….”).

[4] Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc. v. United States, 474 U.S. 121 (1985).

[5] Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001).

[6] See, e.g., United States v. Deaton, 332 F.3d 698, 712 (4th Cir. 2003); Headwaters, Inc. v. Talent Irrigation Dist., 243 F.3d 526, 533 (9th Cir. 2001); Rice v. Harken Exploration Co., 250 F.3d 264, 269 (5th Cir. 2001).

[7] Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006).

[8] Id. at 759.

[9] Id. at 739-42.

[10] EPA-Corps Guidance on “Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision
In Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States” (Dec. 2, 2008), available here. The agencies have relied on ‘guidances’ to describe how they will implement the various court decisions, perhaps reflecting the difficulty they have had trying to promulgate corrective regulations, created largely by intensive lobbying efforts by interested parties.

[11] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence, (External Review Draft Sept. 2013).

[12] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence, (January 2015) available here.

[13] Chart adapted from here.

Written by:

K&L Gates LLP
Contact
more
less

K&L Gates LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.