EPA Issues Final Determination That No Adjustments to GHG Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Will Be Made, but Questions Remain

by Morrison & Foerster LLP

Morrison & Foerster LLP

On January 12, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized its determination not to change greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards for cars and light trucks manufactured in model years (MYs) 2022-2025.  This means that regulations requiring automakers to limit carbon dioxide emissions by increasing fuel efficiency and other means will continue to become more demanding over the next eight years.

While EPA’s “Midterm Evaluation” of its GHG emission standards is now complete, the standards face an uncertain future given the potential for opposition from a Republican-controlled Congress, legal challenges, and the agenda of the incoming Administration.  Additionally, interested parties should stay tuned to ongoing regulatory review by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of its Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) review of California’s Advanced Clean Cars Program, and other agency evaluations of petitions to amend federal standards.

The Final Determination

EPA and NHTSA established existing federal GHG emissions and corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) for light-duty vehicles, including cars and trucks, in 2012.  At that time, EPA committed to conduct a Midterm Evaluation of the GHG standards to determine if adjustments should be made to those set for MY 2022-2025 light-duty vehicles.

EPA completed its Midterm Evaluation last Friday, following the November 2016 release of EPA’s Proposed Determination and the July 2016 release of a Draft Technical Assessment Report issued jointly by EPA, NHTSA, and the California Air Resources Board.

EPA’s Final Determination keeps in place GHG reduction targets for MYs 2022-2025.  If all reductions were achieved exclusively through fuel economy improvements, these standards would demand new cars to average 51.4 mpg by 2025.  However, because automobile manufacturers may meet GHG reduction targets through other means that do not improve fuel economy, such as by improving the efficiency of air conditioning systems, the actual fuel economy required of MY 2025 vehicles is projected to be lower.  Specifically, EPA projects that the GHG standards could be met if automobile manufacturers achieve a “real world” average fuel economy of 36 mpg by 2025.  This represents an improvement of 10 mpg over the next 10 years, or about one mpg per year.

EPA’s Justifications for Not Changing GHG Standards

EPA offered many justifications for its rule, which align with the statutory criteria relevant to setting GHG emissions standards under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.  Four rationales figured most prominently in EPA’s Determination.

First, EPA found keeping GHG standards in place appropriate because they will achieve significant reductions in carbon dioxide emissions and oil consumption.  EPA estimated that the MY2022-2025 standards will reduce GHG emissions by 540 million metric tons and reduce oil consumption by 1.2 billion barrels over the lifetime of the regulated vehicles.

Second, EPA found that compliance with the GHG standards is “feasible at reasonable cost, without need for extensive electrification” of the vehicle fleet.  EPA estimated that the per-vehicle cost of the standards likely will be lower than projected in 2012, or at least comparable.

Third, EPA concluded that the standards will provide significant benefits to consumers and to the public.  The Determination projects that the net benefits of the MY2022-2025 standards are nearly $100 billion, which EPA says “far exceed the costs of the program.”  According to EPA, consumers would realize net savings of $1,650 over the lifetime of a new vehicle, mostly through fuel savings.

Fourth, EPA concluded that “the auto industry is thriving and meeting the standards more quickly than required.”  EPA observed that manufacturers are over-complying with standards applicable to MY2015, even though fuel prices are low, which might be expected to decrease consumer demand for fuel-efficient vehicles.

While it found that lowering standards was not merited, EPA left open the door to raising them, noting that “the current record . . . could support a proposal, and potentially an ultimate decision, to adopt more stringent standards for MY2022-2025.”  However, the EPA declined to raise standards at this time, citing the need to provide certainty to the auto industry and allow for advanced planning.

Remaining Review

While EPA’s Midterm Evaluation is now complete, additional review relevant to the GHG emission standards remains pending before NHTSA, the California Air Resources Board, and EPA. 

Unlike EPA’s authority to regulate emissions from vehicles under the Clean Air Act, which has no time restrictions, NHTSA lacks statutory authority to finalize CAFE standards for more than five years at a time.  For that reason, while EPA finalized GHG emissions standards through MY 2025 back in 2012, NHTSA only provided “augural” or expected standards for MYs 2022-2025.  As EPA acknowledged in its Final Determination, NHTSA still must establish CAFE standards for MYs 2022-2025 at least 18 months before the beginning of each model year.  This will require NHTSA to complete a full notice and comment rulemaking process.  In 2012, EPA expressed intent to issue a final determination regarding its Midterm Evaluation concurrently with NHTSA’s final rule adopting fuel economy standards for MY2022-2025.  EPA explained in its Final Determination that it ultimately did not do so in order to allow “NHTSA to fully account for the GHG standards” and ensure that the auto industry has sufficient lead time to plan for and achieve compliance.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) also continues to review California’s Advanced Clean Cars Program, including the Low and Zero Emission Vehicle regulations, Particulate Matter (PM) Standards, and GHG regulations.  A report on the “Midterm Review” is expected to be released by CARB staff and made available for public comment before consideration by the Board.

In addition to these reviews, EPA’s Final Determination recognizes that a petition submitted by auto industry trade associations on June 20, 2016, remains pending before the EPA.  The petition asks EPA and NHTSA to harmonize GHG standards and CAFE standards, focusing primarily on CAFE standards for MYs 2010-2021, which the trade associations state “could force manufacturers to pay CAFE fines despite being able to meet the GHG standards.”  NHTSA partially granted the petition on December 21, 2016, while recognizing that NHTSA was not speaking for EPA.

Interested parties will want to participate in NHTSA’s rulemaking process for CAFE standards, CARB’s review of California’s Advanced Clean Cars Program, and EPA’s evaluation of the pending petition for rulemaking.

Uncertainties Ahead

Several questions remain about the GHG standards’ future.

First, a Republican-controlled Congress could move to reverse the Final Determination under the Congressional Review Act, which enables Congress, through a filibuster-proof process, to disapprove of regulations adopted within the previous 60 legislative days.  The ability of Congress to use the Congressional Review Act is uncertain given that the Final Determination is not itself a regulation but instead a decision not to adjust an existing regulation.  Additionally, it is possible that President-elect Trump and/or a majority of Congress will not want to resort to use of the Congressional Review Act.  This is because a resolution of disapproval under the Act has the effect of prohibiting agencies from issuing a rule in “substantially the same form” again without the approval of Congress.

Second, existing GHG standards could be reviewed and amended once President-elect Trump takes office. To change the current GHG rules, EPA would need to initiate and complete a new rulemaking, which would take time.  Even then, the EPA would need to provide a reasoned explanation for changing its mind in order to survive judicial scrutiny, which may be difficult given the technical analysis and review the agency has completed to date.  Similarly, while NHTSA has not completed its rulemaking process for MY 2022-2025 CAFE standards, the agency would need to explain any departures from EPA’s conclusions in the Final Determination and the underlying findings of the July 2016 technical assessment report that NHTSA issued jointly with EPA.

Finally, some vehicle manufacturers have expressed discontent with EPA’s Final Determination, including the expedited review process through which it was issued and certain estimates, such as consumer demand for low-emission vehicles, upon which it was based.  Such auto-industry interests could file suit to set aside EPA’s Determination, and would need to do so within 60 days after the date the Determination first appears in the Federal Register.  While the Trump Administration might decide not to defend the EPA’s determination, other stakeholders could intervene and seek to uphold EPA’s decision against the challenge.  If such a lawsuit were successful, it would send the agency back to the drawing board and thus provide the Trump Administration with a cleaner slate on which to decide next steps.

Learn more about EPA’s Final Determination.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.