Equality Act Advances To The Senate And To Controversy

Roetzel & Andress
Contact

Last summer, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, which held that the protected classification of “sex” under Title VII included sexual orientation and gender identity. Under Bostock, LGBT employees and applicants are protected from discrimination on that basis.

However, Bostock did not address religious objections, although the majority opinion acknowledged that the issue was of concern and would need to be addressed in future opinions. As such, therein lies the controversy that the Equality Act, which would amend Title VII and other statues to prohibit discrimination based on LGBT status in employment, public accommodations, and other areas, is certain to encounter in the Senate. In light of the razor-thin majority that proponents of the Equality Act have in the Senate, the lack of religious protections in the Equality Act may spell its doom. Senate Republicans have threatened a filibuster on the Act unless issues of religious objections are resolved.

Currently, about half of the states have no laws specifically banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Indeed, 2021 has seen a slew of bills emerging from various state legislatures that seek to ban transgender women from participating in women’s sports. The political and cultural clashes that seem to accompany any legislation aimed at protecting the LGBT community from discrimination appear to have crystallized around the Equality Act.

An alternative bill, the Fairness for All Act, was introduced in December 2020, and while it banned LGBT discrimination, it included exceptions for religious institutions. Such appears to be a rebuke to the Equality Act, which contains provisions that purport to supersede the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a 1993 law which prohibits the federal government from “substantially burdening” a person’s exercise of free religion unless the government demonstrates that doing so both furthers a compelling governmental interest and represents the least restrictive methods of doing so.

At this point, we will need to watch events surrounding the Equality Act unfold, which events will almost inevitably include some debate about and perhaps even concession to religious concerns. We will continue to keep you updated on this issue.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Roetzel & Andress | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Roetzel & Andress
Contact
more
less

Roetzel & Andress on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.