Fall Road Shows

by Archer Norris PLC

[author: Gary Watt]

For some reason, autumn seems to be the time for MCLE extravaganzas (assuming "MCLE" and "extravaganza" actually go together).  I will be participating in two such events. 

My first road show will be part of the Contra Costa County Bar Association’s annual “MCLE Spectacular” on November 16, 2012.  There, I will join Justice Mark Simons and attorney Don Willenburg in a two hour presentation, “Attorney Fees, Please!”  The program will cover a myriad of issues arising when contractual attorney fee awards are up for grabs, including prevailing party as a matter of right/discretion, fee awards for non-contract claims, and strategies for (legally) maximizing fee awards. 

My second road show will be part of the Association of Defense Counsel’s 53rd Annual Meeting on December 6, 2012.  There, Mr. Willenburg and I will provide a one hour presentation, “Disappearing Dollars,” on strategies and pitfalls in making/evaluating Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offers.

For those interested in reviewing 998 offer fundamentals, read on.  Hope I see you on the road! 

998 Offer Fundamentals

A valid 998 offer is the starting point.  Per Code of Civil Procedure section 998(b), offers must be in writing, and must include a provision allowing the offeree to indicate acceptance “by signing a statement that the offer is accepted.”  Puerta v. Torres (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 1267(award of expert witness fees reversed because the 998 offer lacked statutorily required provision for indicating acceptance).  The offer, however, need not have any magic words.  Berg v. Darden (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 721(otherwise valid 998 offers need not precisely track the language of the statute).

Subject to narrow exceptions such as community property or other unity-of-interest cases, in a multi-party case, separate offers should be made to each defendant or plaintiff.  Taing v. Johnson Scaffolding Co. (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 579 (plaintiff’s joint 998 offer to three defendants insufficiently specific for each defendant to determine amount sought); Menees v. Andrews (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1450 (defendant’s 998 offer invalid because individual plaintiffs had no opportunity to settle unless all settled).

Avoid the temptation to alter the statutory scheme.  Marina Glencoe L.P. v. Neue Sentimental Film AG (2008)168 Cal.App.4th 874 (inclusion of a shorter deadline for acceptance than the statutory scheme provides invalidated the offer by technically revoking it on the expiration date).  And be careful of including conditions in the offer that are not easily capable of valuation.  Barella v. Exchange Bank (2000)84 Cal.App.4th 793 (confidentiality provision rendered valuation of offer uncertain for cost shifting purposes).

Although the circumstances validating early-bird 998 offers should be rare, offers can be served with a summons and complaint.  Barba v. Perez (2008)166 Cal.App.4th 444 (upholding cost shifting under 998 offer served with summons and complaint).  As for later in the case, under subdivision (b), offers must be made “not less than 10 days prior to the commencement of trial or arbitration.”  The “commencement of trial” is statutorily defined as the “opening statement of the plaintiff or counsel.”  And in the absence of opening statements, the “administering of the oath ... to any witness, or the introduction of any evidence” constitutes commencement of trial.  See section 998 (b)(3).  So depending on courtroom availability etc., there may be time to make a 998 offer as late as trial call and beyond.

As for the offer’s amount, there is a good faith requirement that offers be “realistically reasonable” under the circumstances that existed during the acceptance period.  Fortman v. Hemco, Inc. (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 241.  But the offeree has the burden to prove unreasonableness and the standard of review is abuse of discretion.  Santantonio v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co., Inc. (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 102 (1994).  And low offers, including offers to waive costs, are frequently upheld.  Bates v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Inc. (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 210 (offer to waive costs); Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475 (offer of $10,000 plus costs in mesothelioma case upheld as reasonable and shifted six figures in expert witness fees).

Multiple 998 offers can be made during the course of litigation.  But if a subsequent offer is made while a prior offer is still pending, service of the second offer renders the prior offer invalid for cost shifting.  Palmer v. Schindler Elevator Corp. (2003)108 Cal.App.4th 154.  What if two or more valid offers are made during the course of litigation, none are accepted and all are greater in amount than the offeree’s judgment—which one shifts costs?  The state Supreme Court will decide which offer shifts costs when it resolves the split between Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co. Inc. (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 507 (review granted, depublished) which held that the earliest valid offer shifts costs and Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 382, which held that the last valid offer shifts costs.  In some cases, the spread can be huge, so keep an eye out for the Court’s decision.

Is there more?  Oh yeah, there is much, much more at play with 998 offers.  Feel free to shoot me an email or catch me at one of the autumn road shows.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Archer Norris PLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Archer Norris PLC

Archer Norris PLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.