Farewell to John Thompson – Discipline and rigor in your internal controls

Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist
Contact

Compliance Evangelist

Before I begin today’s post, I want to pay honor to one of the top basketball coaches in the 2nd half of the 20th century, who recently passed away. It was John Thompson, long-time coach at Georgetown. As Pat Forde said in his SI.com tribute, “college basketball needed John Thompson more than John Thompson needed college basketball.” He made 19 trips to the NCAA Tournament, from 1982-1985, went to the finals three times and won it all in 1984. He challenged his players to be the best. He challenged Hoya fans to be the best. He challenged the Big East to become the most dominate conference in college basketball. He protested against the NCAA when he felt its admissions standards were unfair to African-American athletes. He saved the life of Allen Iverson. Watching Thompson work a crowd, work the refs, or work the opposing coaches was like watching a Maestro. He even won two rings in the NBA with the Boston Celtics. So, farewell to John Thompson, we sure could use you now.

 New York Times columnist David Brooks’ thoughts on building and maintaining order inform the discussion on rigor in your internal controls. In internal controls, I believe it is incumbent to consider not only the most obvious risk areas for your internal controls but also the universe of potential transactions within the operations of a company. There is a clear need for rigor in your internal controls protocols and adherence to that rigor can increase operationalization around the internal controls a company should consider including gifts, travel and entertainment expenses.

One area that companies need to be mindful of is corporate checks and wire transfers, in response to falsified supporting documentation, such as check requests, purchase orders, or vendor invoices. The Delegation of Authority (DOA) is a critical internal control. For example, a wire transfer of $X between company bank accounts in the US might require approval by the Finance Manager at the initiating location and one officer. However, a wire transfer of $X to the company’s bank account in Nigeria, could require approval by the Finance Manager, a knowledgeable person in the compliance function, and one officer. The key is that the DOA should specify who must give the final approval for such an expense.

Petty cash disbursements in locations outside the US have unique control issues. Some petty cash funds outside the US have small balances but substantial throughput of transactions. Your DOA should address replenishment of petty cash funds in countries outside the US, as well as approval of expense reports for employees who work outside the US, including those who travel from the US to work outside the US.

Another area for concern is travel, the reason for this being that a company’s corporate travel department and independent travel agencies can buy tickets, hotel rooms, etc., for non-employees. Internal controls might be needed to ensure policies are enforced when travel for non-employees can be purchased through a corporate travel department or through independent travel agencies. As was demonstrated with the GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) bribery and corruption criminal conviction in China, a company must not discount the risk related to abuse of power internally and collusion with independent travel agencies. You should implement procedures to ensure compliance with your company policies regarding payment of travel and related expenses for third parties, for not only visits to manufacturing or job sites but also any compliance restrictions that might be in place.

An area for fraud, corruption and corporate abuse has long been P-Cards. If your company uses P-Cards, assume this to be a very high-risk area, not just for bribery and corruption but also for fraud risk generally. Banks have made a great selling job to corporations for the use of P-Cards to help to facilitate “cash management” but, more often than not, they can simply be a streamlined way to allow embezzlement and misbehavior to go undetected. Here a control objective should be put in place along the lines of a written policy and procedure defining the acceptable and unacceptable use of company P-Cards, required forms, required approvals, documentation and review requirements.

If the pre-approval process and strong controls over expense reports prevent misbehavior, employees who wish to misbehave will seek other ways to do it where controls are not so strong. This means you should use your risk assessment process to help prioritize where controls are most needed. If your company prohibits gifts and any travel other than for the submitting employee from being included in the expense report, you should consider requiring instead a check request form be used, which would be subject to stringent controls. In such cases a checklist should be completed and attached to the request which includes questions and disclosures designed to flush out exactly what was provided in the way of a business class airline, pocket money, event tickets, side trips, leisure activities, spouses or other relatives who might be traveling and why the travel had business purpose. Such an internal control would allow for a more streamlined processing of expense reports and still elevates the items to the appropriate level of review and requires appropriate documentation.

One question I am often asked is why does a company need internal controls in place regarding gifts because in many companies internal audits of these expense reports are common? It is important to keep in mind that, with respect to gifts, travel and entertainment, internal audits most often constitute, at best, a detect control, which only gives comfort for some historical period and is not necessarily representative of the controls in place to prevent future violations. So, it will be a false sense of security if a compliance officer relies on the internal audit of expense reports to be the control needed over violation of gift policies.

Brooks said, “Building and maintaining order…requires toughness of mind and rigid discipline to properly serve your own work.” By having the rigor to institute and enforce the types of internal controls identified, you can go a long way towards detecting and, more importantly, preventing a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violation from occurring.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist

Written by:

Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide