FCC Proposes Answers to Unwanted Calls

by Pillsbury - CommLawCenter
Contact

Robocalls and telemarketing calls are reliably the top source of consumer complaints received by the FCC. Despite the good intentions of the 1991 Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), FCC decisions implementing the TCPA, and the collective efforts of the telecom industry, there has been little relief from these unwanted calls—particularly at dinner time.  More problematic is that an increasing number of these calls use false (or spoofed) Caller ID to perpetrate scams designed to trick call recipients into believing the call is coming from the Internal Revenue Service, law enforcement, computer support, or a credit card company.

The FCC is now making another attempt to reduce unwanted and sometimes fraudulent telemarketing calls and robocalls.  In a draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry circulated March 2nd and to be considered formally at the next FCC Open Meeting on March 23rd, the FCC is proposing to adopt rules that would allow voice service providers (including wireline, wireless and VoIP providers) to block spoofed calls in certain circumstances.

In the draft NPRM, the FCC is proposing to codify guidance issued last year by the FCC’s Consumer Bureau permitting voice service providers to block calls that use a number for Caller ID where the legitimate holder of that number requests such blocking in order to prevent its number from being spoofed.   Such calls are deemed to be presumptively spoofed and therefore likely to violate the FCC’s anti-spoofing rules.  The FCC is grappling with how service providers can share among themselves that a customer wishes to have a telephone number blocked, and how that request can be honored efficiently and effectively.

The FCC is also proposing to permit providers to block calls that use a Caller ID number the provider knows is not assigned to anyone.  The use of unassigned phone numbers in a Caller ID is deemed a strong indicator of Caller ID spoofing intended to defraud and harm the called party. The FCC indicates there are three categories of unassigned phone numbers, and is seeking comment on new rules permitting providers to block calls from each category.  The FCC is also asking whether other categories of numbers should be considered unassigned for this purpose.

For similar reasons, the FCC is proposing to allow providers to block calls from invalid telephone numbers.  Examples include numbers from unassigned area codes (e.g., 911), those that do not contain 10 digits, or those that repeat a single digit (000-000-0000).  The FCC is seeking comment on what it can do to assist providers in more readily identifying or blocking calls from invalid numbers.

In an effort to be expansive, the FCC is proposing to allow providers to block calls from numbers that are valid, but which have yet to be assigned to any specific service provider for customer use.  The FCC is also seeking comment on whether and how any rules adopted would apply to internationally-originated calls.

To keep the blocking process as simple as possible, the FCC is not proposing to require that providers get opt-in consent from their subscribers before blocking calls to those subscribers.  The assumption is that no reasonable person would want to receive fraudulent or spoofed calls.

In the draft Notice of Inquiry, the FCC addresses industry concerns that blocking presumptively illegal calls might run afoul of existing FCC requirements that providers not block calls at all.  Specifically, the FCC is seeking information on authorizing providers to block calls that are reasonably likely to be illegal or fraudulent based on certain objective criteria.  This includes a discussion of methods that can be used to more accurately identify illegal and fraudulent calls and how to minimize false positives when blocking calls based on these methods.

Related to that concern, the FCC is asking for comment on creating a safe harbor for providers.  The intent would be to assure providers blocking calls in accordance with the adopted rules that they will not find themselves charged with violating the FCC’s call blocking rules or have their FCC statistics on call completion rates adversely affected.

Of course, the FCC recognizes that there may also be situations where legitimate calls are blocked, and is therefore seeking comment on how that problem may be addressed (e.g., using a white list or establishing a challenge mechanism for calls blocked in error).  In that regard, the FCC wants to establish a process to allow legitimate callers to notify providers when calls are improperly blocked and to require providers to immediately cease blocking legitimate calls.

The FCC’s draft document specifically states that it is not a final version.  The early circulation of the draft allows for public input up until one week before the March 23 meeting (allowing input up to the close of business on March 16).  In our experience, getting issues fixed before the Notice of Proposed Rule Making is adopted, rather than trying to alter the proposal after it is incorporated into an adopted NPRM, is the better path.  As a result, if you are concerned about any language in the draft that has been circulated, you should communicate that to the FCC now, rather than waiting for the comment cycle to commence after the NPRM is adopted.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pillsbury - CommLawCenter | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pillsbury - CommLawCenter
Contact
more
less

Pillsbury - CommLawCenter on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.