FCPA Industry Sweep Strikes Hollywood

by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

[author: John M. Hynes]

In the past, we have reported on a number of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") developments and have furnished subscribers with a primer on the FCPA. The latest developments in this area relate to an investigation of the motion picture industry and its activities in China.

On April 26, 2012, Reuters reported that the US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") recently sent letters of inquiry to several prominent movie studios seeking information about their dealings in China that may constitute violations of the FCPA. Later reports indicate that the letters were sent to Twentieth Century Fox, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures, Universal Pictures, Walt Disney Studios, Warner Bros., and Dreamworks Animation.

Background of the SEC Inquiry

While the specific nature of the alleged improper payments has not been disclosed, the SEC letters of inquiry reportedly focus on potential unlawful payments to the state-owned China Film Group ("CFG"), which has historically controlled the Chinese film market. The CFG, however, has denied any involvement in the inquiry.

This inquiry comes at a time when the Chinese film industry is booming. In 2011, Chinese box office revenue grew about 35% to $2.1 billion, most of which was generated by 3D films. On the heels of this growth, in February 2012, the CFG eased restrictions on the entry of foreign films into China, exempting 14 premium format films (e.g., 3D films) from the limit of 20 foreign films per year. Perhaps not coincidentally, the CFG passed these relaxed restrictions soon after China's Vice President, Xi Jinping, visited Washington, DC and Los Angeles in February 2012.

Hollywood studios have taken advantage of the growing Chinese film industry, inking a wave of deals both before and after the CFG eased its foreign film restrictions. For example, in 2011, Dreamworks' Kung Fu Panda was the highest grossing animated movie in China, raking in about $100 million in box office sales. Moreover, in February 2012, Dreamworks announced its plan to build a production studio in Shanghai with some of the largest media firms in China. Disney has also taken advantage of the favorable film industry climate in China, recently announcing that the next Iron Man film will be co-produced in China pursuant to an agreement among Disney, its Marvel Studios unit, and China's DMG Entertainment.

FCPA Industry Sweeps

This inquiry is the latest in a series of so-called "industry sweeps" conducted by US regulators designed to root out potential FCPA violations across particular business sectors. The SEC and Department of Justice ("DOJ") have been known to launch wide-ranging FCPA investigations into multiple companies when they have reason to believe that the alleged conduct represents a pattern or practice within the industry. Because industry sweeps are often triggered by perceived wrongdoing within only one particular company, the Government may investigate companies without any evidence or specific allegations of wrongdoing.

Over the past decade, the U.S. Government has devoted significant resources to FCPA industry sweeps. For example, the SEC recently launched inquiries into at least 10 financial services firms regarding whether they made improper payments in seeking investments from sovereign wealth funds. The SEC and DOJ have also recently been conducting FCPA investigations into various pharmaceutical and medical device companies, including Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Merck. Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay $70 million to settle the allegations against it. Additionally, in 2007, the SEC and DOJ began launching FCPA investigations involving at least seven oil and gas companies, including Panalpina World Transport and Transocean, resulting in more than $230 million in disgorgement, fines, and penalties.

FCPA Enforcement Activity Leading Up to Movie Industry Sweep

The movie industry sweep comes as no surprise to many due to recent FCPA enforcement activity involving the film industry and the Government's longstanding focus on potential FCPA issues in China. In September 2009, a federal jury in Los Angeles convicted two Hollywood film executives – Gerald and Patricia Green – of substantive FCPA violations and conspiracy to violate the FCPA for paying approximately $1.8 million in bribes to the former governor of the Tourism Authority of Thailand in exchange for contracts to operate the annual Bangkok International Film Festival worth more than $13.5 million. Both executives were sentenced to six months in prison.

Additionally, while the growing Chinese economy offers a wealth of opportunities for American businesses, China has long been a primary focus of the U.S. Government's FCPA enforcement efforts. The prevalence of state-controlled entities coupled with widespread corruption and questionable business traditions makes China an FCPA trap for unwary American businesses. Indeed, between 2006 and 2011, about 9% of all FCPA enforcement actions involved activity in China.

What this All Means for Companies in the Film Industry

The SEC's strategy in sending letters of inquiry to multiple movie studios suggests that it is taking an industry-wide approach to this matter. As such, companies and individuals across the entire film industry could be at risk and should react accordingly. This risk is not limited to major movie studios, as the FCPA applies to a broad range of entities and individuals. Indeed, the recent uptick in FCPA enforcement actions against individuals, including the convictions of two film executives discussed above, suggests that the Government may eventually seek FCPA charges against individuals involved in the alleged illegal activity as well as the companies. In addition to disgorgement, fines, and penalties faced by both individuals and companies, individuals can face lengthy prison sentences for violating the FCPA.

Companies can take various steps to ensure that they are prepared if and when the Government comes knocking on their door. While it is always advisable to have a robust and effective FCPA compliance program in place, it is even more important now for companies in the film industry to ensure that their compliance programs are up-to-date and being properly implemented so that they can gain credit if the Government launches an investigation. This is especially true for film companies with dealings in China, as these companies are on the SEC's radar. To this end, film companies should consider a privileged review of their FCPA compliance programs by outside counsel to ensure that they include all the components that the Government deems necessary, including anti-corruption policies and procedures, training and communication, third-party due diligence, anti-corruption contract clauses, internal accounting controls, auditing of program effectiveness, and response to improper conduct and remedial action.

At-risk companies should also consider a privileged internal review by counsel to determine whether any FCPA issues exist and, if so, decide whether to disclose the issues to the Government. While companies can earn cooperation credit for self-disclosing potential violations, the question of whether and what to voluntarily disclose to the Government is a complex decision involving both risks and rewards for the company. Irrespective of whether a disclosure is made, however, launching a preemptive internal review will allow the company to stay ahead of the Government and be best prepared in the event that the Government initiates its own inquiry.


Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.