Federal Circuit to review availability of appeal of Patent Trial and Appeal Board institution decisions

by Dentons
Contact

Dentons

On January 4, 2017, the Federal Circuit decided to address en banc the scope of review of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) decisions on institution of inter partes reviews (IPRs). To date, the Federal Circuit has routinely refused to consider appeals of decisions by the PTAB to institute IPR trials, holding that 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) prohibits review of decisions on institution because the statute states that such decisions are “final and nonappealable.”1

In September 2016, the Federal Circuit, in Wi-Fi One v. Broadcom, ruled that the PTAB’s decision to institute trial, which rejected the patent owner’s challenge that the petition was time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315, was not reviewable on appeal.2

The court felt constrained to follow its earlier Achates decision, which squarely held that these types of issues were “final and nonappealable.”3

The en banc Federal Circuit will decide the following question: “Should [the Federal Circuit] overrule Achates … and hold that judicial review is available for a patent owner to challenge the PTO’s determination that the petitioner satisfied the timeliness requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) governing the filing of petitions for inter partes review?”4

At issue in the rehearing en banc is the interpretation of the Supreme Court’s In re Cuozzo decision.5 In Cuozzo, the court sided with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as well as the majority of a divided Federal Circuit, upholding the proposition that decisions on institution are generally not appealable. The court opined that the prohibition against reviewability applies to “questions that are closely tied to the application and interpretation of statutes related to the USPTO’s decision to initiate inter partes review.”

Wi-Fi has taken the position that Cuozzo “tied the limitation of judicial review to the USPTO’s ability to make its substantive patentability determination as embodied in § 314(a).” In other words, Wi-Fi argued that the Supreme Court limited the statutory bar against judicial review to the board’s determination at the time of institution of whether a particular reference raises a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. Wi-Fi also argued that the ban on appeals is limited to issues arising under § 314 (not the time bar provisions arising under § 315), because of the statutory text providing that the director’s determination of whether to institute an IPR under § 314 is not reviewable.

Wi-Fi has also implicated principles of administrative law, which could be important. For example, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(C) states, “The reviewing court shall … set aside agency action … found to be … in excess of statutory jurisdiction.” A decision as to whether a party is time-barred from filing an IPR petition under 35 U.S.C. § 315(d) might be such a jurisdictional issue. Unfortunately, administrative law is an area that few understand, and parties often do not fully consider all aspects of this esoteric area of the law.

The decision could have ramifications for other issues decided at institution, such as estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2), whether assignor estoppel applies to PTAB cases, whether the PTAB can join parties and issues, and whether petitioners can appeal decisions to not institute. Dentons’ significant experience in IPRs and administrative law makes us well-positioned to ensure that our clients’ rights are fully preserved under the continuously evolving post-grant practice landscape.

The forthcoming en banc decision will hopefully clarify what types of issues the Federal Circuit will review from the PTAB’s decisions on institution.


  1. There was, however, one narrow exception, which was to review whether the PTAB properly found a patent to be a covered business method (CBM), and therefore eligible for a CBM post-grant review. Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., 793 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
  2. Appeal 2015-1944, Decision dated September 16, 2016.
  3. Achates Reference Publ’g, Inc. v Apple Inc., 803 F.3d 652, 658 (Fed. Cir. 2015), cert. dismissed, 136 S. Ct. 998 (2016
  4. Wi-Fi One, order dated January 4, 2017.
  5. Cuozzo Speed Tech’s, LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131 (2016).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dentons
Contact
more
less

Dentons on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.