Federal Judges And Corporate Settlement Agreements

by Michael Volkov

corppleaFCPA commentators frequently characterize the Department of Justice as the investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury when it comes to corporate FCPA investigations and settlements.  Given the fact that few corporations, if any, are willing to take a criminal FCPA case to trial, companies often have only one chance to argue and vindicate their interests – at the Department of Justice.

The role of federal judges in handling FCPA settlements and other criminal and civil resolutions may be changing.  In some cases, the Justice Department does not even involve the courts – when it agrees to a Non-Prosecution Agreement along with a penalty and detailed complaince agreements.

In the last few years, several federal judges, if given the opportunity have been exercising some judicial oversight.  Judge Leon in the District of Columbia has taken some hard looks at a settlement involving Daimler and recently, the SEC’s settlement with IBM.  In reaction, the SEC is now using administrative proceedings and resolutions to avoid filing a settlement with a federal judge who may want to revisit some of the issues in a proposed settlement.

Judge Gleeson in New York took his sweet time to approve the HSBC settlement after six months of proceedings.  Judge Rakoff in the same district is notorious for tackling difficult issues and questioning corporate settlements.corpplea3

Judge William Young from the District of Massachusetts joined this activist club in a decision rejecting two corporate plea agreements that contained binding sentencing recommendations.  In doing so, the court proclaimed that it would rarely, if ever, accept such agreements in the future.

Judge Young urged other district courts to play a more active role in protecting the public interest when deciding whether to accept a corporation’s guilty plea.   In the first case, U.S. v. Orthofix, Inc., Judge Young rejected a proposed disposition requiring Orthofix to plead guilty to obstructing a federal audit and pay a $7.7 million fine.  In the second case, U.S. v. APTx Vehicle Systems, agreed to enter a plea agreement a pay a $1 million criminal fine and a $2 million civil penalty for failure to deliver on a federal contract.

Judge Young rejected the pleas from both Orthofix and APTx after concluding that the agreements did not sufficiently protect the public interest.   Judge Young used the case to argue that federal judges should reject binding plea agreements and should exercise their responsibility to fashion an appropriate sentence.

corpplea5Most judges routinely accept corporate plea agreements with binding sentences.  Few are willing to challenge the government in resolving such cases.  Only a few judges are willing to reject such agreements and re-open the issue.  Federal judges have egos (or else they would not be where they are) and are increasingly uncomfortable when they are cut out of the judicial process.

Judges complain when their discretion is constrained.  They hated the mandatory Federal Sentencing Guidelines before the Booker decision for that very reason.  Now they are complaining about corporate settlements which contain binding sentencing terms – if the judge accepts the plea, the judge has to impose the agreed upon sentence.

Time will tell how many judges will join the cause and preserve judicial discretion.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Michael Volkov, The Volkov Law Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Michael Volkov

The Volkov Law Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.