FERC Enforcement Director Calls For Legislative Fix To Address Hunter Decision

by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

On January 15, 2014, Mr. Norman Bay, Director of the Office of Enforcement at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), testified at a Senate Banking Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Protection hearing entitled “Regulating Financial Holding Companies and Physical Commodities.”  Mr. Bay’s testimony focused on FERC’s anti-fraud and manipulation oversight with respect to financial institutions trading in FERC-jurisdictional electric and natural gas markets.  Mr. Bay’s prepared remarks and testimony provide an interesting insight into FERC’s enforcement regime.  Notably, Mr. Bay called for a legislative fix to address FERC’s enforcement authority in light of the recent Hunter v. FERC decision. 

Also appearing at the hearing were Mr. Vince McGonagle, Director, Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); and Mr. Michael Gibson, Director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve).  Four senators, all Democrats, were present and asked questions at the hearing: Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Jack Reed (D-RI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). 

In his testimony, Mr. Bay discussed FERC’s authority for investigating and enforcing the prohibition on fraud and market manipulation in FERC-jurisdictional electric and natural gas markets under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.  Mr. Bay highlighted FERC’s enhanced civil penalty authority, noting that FERC has imposed and collected approximately $873 million in civil penalties and disgorgement since the Energy Policy Act of 2005.  Mr. Bay expressed his view that FERC does have the tools necessary to effectively police FERC-regulated markets to deter fraud and market manipulation.  He highlighted FERC’s expanded enforcement capabilities and surveillance tools in recent years, including the Office of Enforcement’s Division of Analytics and Surveillance. 

Mr. Bay provided an overview of fraudulent and manipulative conduct that has occurred in FERC-regulated markets.  Mr. Bay explained how physical natural gas and electricity transactions can help set the prices on which financial products are based, so an entity can use physical trades to impact prices in a way that benefits its overall financial position.  According to Mr. Bay, there is a common framework across many of the manipulation matters that FERC has or is currently investigating: a physical transaction is used as a “tool” to “target” a physical price in order to raise or lower that price in a way that will increase the value of a “benefitting position,” which is often a financial product.  

Given that FERC’s anti-fraud and manipulation rule is an intent-based rule, FERC’s investigations focus on understanding the nature and scope of an entity’s benefitting financial positions and how they relate to the physical positions.  According to Mr. Bay, “A company can put on a large physical trade that may affect market prices, but if the purpose of that trade is to hedge risk or speculate based on market fundamentals—rather than, for example, the intent to move prices to benefit a related financial position—this conduct, without more, would not violate our anti-fraud and manipulation rule.”  Mr. Bay cited recent FERC enforcement cases involving allegations of market manipulation by financial institutions, including Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan.

Mr. Bay highlighted two regulatory limitations on FERC’s anti-fraud and manipulation efforts, which are related to the recent memoranda of understanding between FERC and the CFTC.  On January 2, 2014, FERC and the CFTC entered into two memoranda of understanding addressing (i) the sharing of information, and (ii) procedures for resolving overlapping jurisdictional issues.  These memoranda are over three years in the making and roughly three years past the deadline set by Congress under the Dodd-Frank Act.  For more information, see FERC and CFTC Reach Agreement on Information Sharing and Jurisdiction

First, Mr. Bay emphasized FERC’s inability to obtain certain financial data—much of which is related to trading in CFTC-regulated markets—that FERC considers important to its surveillance and investigation efforts.  According to Mr. Bay, this missing financial data creates a gap in the FERC’s ability to conduct effective and comprehensive surveillance of the natural gas and electric markets.  In response to questioning from Senator Elizabeth Warren during the hearing, Mr. Bay and Mr. McGonagle testified that the CFTC is making the Large Trader Report, which FERC had previously requested, available for review by FERC at the CFTC’s offices.  According to Mr. McGonagle, FERC and the CFTC are still working out confidentiality and technical issues regarding the data transfer of the Large Trader Report. 

Second, Mr. Bay pointed to the jurisdictional uncertainty created by the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit last year in Hunter v. FERC.  In that case, the court ruled that manipulation of natural gas futures contracts falls within the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction, so FERC does not have authority to pursue actions involving manipulation in the futures markets.  According to Mr. Bay, “Although [FERC] reads the Hunter decision as narrow in scope, some market participants interpret the decision more broadly to cover not only manipulation in the futures market, but also many additional transactions and products, including those squarely within FERC’s jurisdictional markets.”  As a result, Mr. Bay called for a legislative fix to eliminate this uncertainty.

Mr. Bay’s testimony also provides insight into how FERC views financial institutions that participate in FERC-regulated markets.  According to Mr. Bay, FERC “has not taken any view on the participation in its regulated markets by financial holding companies (or any trading firm, bank, or other financial institution) versus more traditional energy companies like generators, utilities, or natural gas pipeline owners.”  Nonetheless, Bay asserted that FERC’s “general view has been that financial institutions of all kinds, as well as energy companies of all kinds, can benefit markets in numerous ways, for example, by providing liquidity to market participants who may want to hedge their risk.”  Mr. Bay highlighted how financial institutions have generally played a role in the physical electricity and natural gas markets regulated by FERC. 

For purposes of analyzing potential market manipulation, Mr. Bay noted that even though banks and financial institutions as a whole may have a relatively lower percentage of sales and generation ownership interest compared to more traditional energy companies, the market share of a given bank or financial institution at a particular natural gas trading hub or electric market trading point could still be high and have a significant effect on the price formed at that hub or point.  Therefore, banks and financial institutions may have the ability to move prices in a manipulative manner.

For more information about the hearing and the testimony, including an archive webcast, see http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_id=0e55dd8e-8589-4120-8c3e-2c6dc95f7f40.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.