First District Reverses Dismissal on Statute of Limitations Grounds

Novack and Macey LLP
Contact

Novack and Macey LLP

The First District reversed the dismissal of a legal malpractice claim on statute of limitations grounds.

Plaintiff argued that the law firm that represented his mother failed to properly assess her mental capacity when it helped her change her estate plan at the behest of his brother.  Consequently, when he was appointed her guardian, he had to expend funds to correct the estate plan.

The law firm moved to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds and argued that plaintiff was aware of wrongdoing more than two years prior to filing suit because he knew of his brother’s alleged undue influence.  The court held that there was an issue of fact whether plaintiff’s knowledge of his brother’s wrongdoing put him on inquiry notice of the law firm’s wrongdoing.  The court also held that the mother’s claims were tolled while she suffered from a disability, even though her son held her power of attorney, allegedly knew of her claims and could have brought suit on her behalf.

P. Andrew Katz, Individually and as Limited Guardian for the Estate of Alyce K. Newman v. Michael Hartz, Elizabeth Kreasy, and Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP; 2021 IL App (1st) 200331

 

Written by:

Novack and Macey LLP
Contact
more
less

Novack and Macey LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.