Forum Selection Clause in an Unsigned Pre-Petition Engagement Letter is Binding on Chapter 11 Trustee.

by Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Every lawyer knows that it is important to enter into a signed engagement letter with a client before commencing legal representation.  But, as one law firm recently discovered, even an unsigned engagement letter is better than none at all.  The decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Glass v. Miller & Martin, PLLC addresses this plus several other key concepts for Bankruptcy Court litigants.[1]  

In 2011, after years of financial difficulties, Hutcheson Medical Center (“Hospital”) retained the law firm of Miller & Martin (“Defendant”) to represent it in connection with a series of transactions intended to stave off a bankruptcy filing.  These efforts were ultimately unsuccessful and, on November 20, 2014, the Hospital filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition.  A Chapter 11 Trustee (“Trustee”) was appointed and, as part of his administration of the bankruptcy estate, he brought claims against the Defendant for legal malpractice.[2]

After denial of its motion to withdraw the reference and after demanding a jury trial, the Defendant filed a motion to transfer venue of the action from the Bankruptcy Court in the Northern District of Georgia to the Eastern District of Tennessee.  The request was based upon a forum selection clause contained in Defendant’s engagement letter with the Hospital.[3]

The Bankruptcy Court approved the motion to transfer.  As a threshold matter, the Court determined that even though no representative of the Hospital ever signed the engagement letter containing the forum selection clause, the Hospital’s conduct over the years established its assent to the terms.[4]  The Court likewise showed little concern about enforcing a pre-petition forum selection clause in bankruptcy against a Chapter 11 Trustee.  “The enforcement of a forum selection clause in a non-core proceeding that involves a debtor-derived claim does not threaten the objectives of the Bankruptcy Code or impair the Trustee's ability to fulfill his duties. In this proceeding, the Trustee stands in the shoes of HMC with respect to its prepetition, non-bankruptcy, state law claims against [Defendant].”[5]      

After determining that neither the absence of a signed engagement letter nor the intervening bankruptcy altered the analysis, the Court next turned to the enforceability of forum selection clauses outside of bankruptcy.  The Supreme Court has held that, “[w]hen the parties have agreed to a valid forum-selection clause, a district court should ordinarily transfer the case to the forum specified in that clause. Only under extraordinary circumstances unrelated to the convenience of the parties should a § 1404(a) motion be denied.”[6]  The Trustee argued that congestion in the Courts of the Eastern District of Tennessee relative to the Northern District of Georgia as well as the “local interest in having local controversies decided in a home forum,” constituted the type of “extraordinary circumstances” warranting denial of the motion to transfer.  The Court rejected both arguments.  Neither of these considerations rose to the level required to justify non-enforcement of an otherwise valid forum selection clause.[7]

Finally, the Trustee urged the Court to prohibit invocation of the forum selection clause because the Defendant “substantially participated in litigation in this proceeding to the extent that its delayed request to enforce the engagement letter's forum selection clause results in a waiver. [ . . . ] Only after the District Court denied its motion to withdraw the reference did [Defendant] attempt to invoke the forum selection clause.”[8]  But the Court was unpersuaded. 

[T]he mere filing of the jury trial demand and the filing of the motion to withdraw the reference do not indicate an intent to waive its prepetition choice of forum. Deadlines exist for the filing of a jury trial demand and a motion to withdraw the reference. It is not unreasonable or unexpected for a defendant to take such necessary steps to protect its rights in the first stages of an adversary proceeding. [. . . ]  Three months elapsed between the filing of the complaint and the filing of the motion to transfer venue. No discovery has occurred. The parties have acted timely and promptly within the stipulated deadline extensions they agreed upon. Based on the foregoing, under the totality of the circumstances, [Defendant] has not acted inconsistently with its right to invoke the forum selection clause.[9]

Bankruptcy Court litigants should take careful note of this Opinion:  even an unsigned, prepetition forum selection clause may provide a sufficient basis for transferring venue away from a Bankruptcy Court. 

[1] Glass v. Miller & Martin, PLLC, 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 3523 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. October 6, 2017) (“Opinion”).  Because the dispute arose in a non-core proceeding, the Bankruptcy Court’s Opinion was technically a series of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to be reviewed de novo by the District Court. See Opinion at *4.  But, less than three weeks later, the Opinion was adopted in its entirety by the District Court.  Glass v. Miller & Martin, PLLC, Case No. 17-cv-0023, Dkt. No. 10 (N.D. Ga. October 25, 2017). 

[2] The Trustee alleged that, in connection with the pre-bankruptcy transactions meant to save the Hospital, the Defendant pledged certain assets of the Hospital to a third party without the knowledge or consent of the Hospital, thus precluding the Hospital from receiving equivalent value for the assets and diminishing the Hospital’s prospects to obtain additional financing.  See Opinion at *9.

[3] The provision provided as follows:  “Any claim, dispute or legal proceeding arising out of or relating to M&M's engagement may be brought in any state or federal court within Hamilton County, Tennessee, and Client irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such court in any such legal proceeding; waives any objection Client now or hereafter may have to the venue or to the convenience of the forum; agrees that all claims in respect of such proceedings shall be heard and determined only in any such court; and agrees not to bring any such proceeding arising out of or relating to M&M's engagement in any other court.”  Opinion at *10. 

[4] Opinion at *22. 

[5] Id. at *26-27.  The Court based this determination on In re Exide Technologies, 544 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 2008), which held that forum selection clauses are generally enforceable in bankruptcy if the claims to be transferred are not core.  But Exide also makes clear that a forum selection clause will generally not be given effect to transfer core claims out of the Bankruptcy Court.  Id. at 206.

[6] Opinion at *27 (quoting Atlantic Marine Constr. Co., v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for Western Dist. Of Texas, U.S., 134 S. Ct. 568 (2013)).

[7] Id. at *32-38.

[8] Id. at *38, *40. The Trustee also argued that by invoking the right to a jury, which was prohibited under the engagement letter, the Defendant took inconsistent positions that amount to a waiver. But the Court summarily dismissed this contention:  the “Trustee cites no case for the proposition that waiver of one provision (the jury trial prohibition) results in waiver of another provision or nullification of the document.  This argument is not dispositive or persuasive.”  Id. at *44.

[9] Id. at *40-41,* 43.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.