Fourth Circuit: No Ratification, No Vicarious Liability

by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

The U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of two Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) defendants the panel found were not vicariously liable for calls made by telemarketers promoting their products.

Janet Hodgin sued UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp. and Honeywell, claiming that telemarketers sent prerecorded messages and called numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry to promote the defendants’ products. The defendants ratified this conduct because they benefited financially from the statutory violations and failed to punish the telemarketers’ misconduct, Hodgin charged.

Both companies manufactured home security systems, which they sold to distributors for resale to retailers. Neither company received direct proceeds from the products’ resale to a retailer or consumers. UTC had a deal with Versatile Marketing Systems (VMS), a retailer that used telemarketers to sell the systems, that permitted VMS to use UTC’s trademarks in limited ways.

In 2011, UTC began receiving complaints about VMS’s telemarketing practices. It followed up with complainants and relayed the grievances to VMS. It also required VMS to attend an ethics presentation and later terminated the contract when it determined VMS’s misconduct was damaging its reputation.

Honeywell received similar complaints that one of its retailers, ISI Alarms, was making aggressive telemarketing calls. In 2012, Honeywell received additional complaints about the use of prerecorded calls and ignoring requests to be placed on the company’s no-call list. Honeywell responded to the complaints by opening an investigation that included visits to ISI headquarters and calls from its legal team. ISI insisted that it was not responsible for any misconduct, but Honeywell ultimately terminated the deal in January 2013.

Hodgin’s complaint was consolidated with six other TCPA class actions. The defendants moved for summary judgment, and a district court judge granted the motion. Hodgin appealed, but the federal appellate panel affirmed.

“Plaintiffs failed to proffer more than a scintilla of evidence to support the conclusion that UTC and Honeywell were vicariously liable for the telemarketers’ alleged TCPA violations,” the court said.

A party may ratify an act by failing to object to or repudiate it, or by receiving or retaining the benefits it generates, the Fourth Circuit recognized. However, a party is not bound by a ratification made without knowledge of material facts involved in the original act when the party was unaware of such lack of knowledge.

That was the case for UTC and Honeywell, the court said. When UTC received complaints about VMS, it followed up with the complainant and required the head of VMS to attend an ethics presentation that emphasized telemarketers were contractually obligated to comply with all applicable telemarketing laws. “Finally, UTC terminated its dealer agreement with VMS at least in part because it determined that VMS’s aggressive telemarketing practices were damaging UTC’s reputation,” the panel wrote.

The record demonstrated similar repudiation by Honeywell. When it learned about ISI’s alleged misconduct, the company opened an investigation and informed ISI that its telemarketing practices had placed their business relationship in jeopardy. Despite ISI’s assurances it was not involved in any wrongdoing, Honeywell “terminated its sales agreement with ISI because, among other things, Honeywell continued to receive complaints about ISI’s telemarketing practices,” the court said.

Hodgin also missed the mark with her argument that the defendants made money from the alleged telemarketing misconduct. Although VMS and ISI were entitled to rebates if they purchased a minimum amount of home security products from the defendants each year, “the connections between the rebates and the purported TCPA violations is so attenuated that Plaintiffs’ claim that UTC and Honeywell intended the rebates to reward such misconduct amounts to mere speculation,” the court wrote.

In addition, the plaintiff missed the element of ratification that a party cannot be bound without knowledge of material facts. “Plaintiffs do not cite any evidence showing that UTC and Honeywell knew that the telemarketers’ high sales numbers were fueled by robocalls and calls to the Do Not Call Registry when they signed the dealer and sales agreements that entitled the telemarketers to the rebates in question,” the Fourth Circuit said.

Not only did neither of the defendants receive any direct proceeds from the telemarketers’ sale of home security products to consumers, the plaintiff “failed to proffer any evidence supporting the allegation that illegal telemarketing practices increased VMS’s and ISI’s sales of home security products,” the court wrote, affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendants.

To read the opinion in Hodgin v. UTC Fire & Security Americas Inc., click here.

Why it matters: The Fourth Circuit decision offers a road map for parties seeking to avoid vicarious liability under the TCPA. Both of the defendants made attempts to have third parties achieve compliance with federal telemarketing laws, followed up on consumer complaints, launched investigations into concerns about improper telemarketing, and ultimately terminated their dealer and sales contracts. Given these efforts, the court found the defendants had not ratified the allegedly illegal activity cited in the plaintiffs’ complaint and could not be liable under the statute.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.