Fox News Reports Copyright “Attack on Christians” – The Fair and Balanced Use Defense

by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

Fox news recently reported on a dispute between Gulfport, Mississippi resident Kelly Taylor and her local Walgreens pharmacy.  Ms. Taylor, using Walgreens’ online Capturephoto service, attempted to print out a few pages of the Bible to hand out to members of her church. Walgreens refused, citing copyright law. When Walgreens told Taylor that it would require approval from the author, she informed the store that God was the author so “who exactly would I get the approval from?”

Ms. Taylor was “in total shock,” so she contacted Fox News and declared that this was an “attack on Christians.” In the resulting story, Fox News explained that copyright law only protects work for the life of the author “plus 50 years,” and that it “has never applied to the Good Book.”  Therefore, Walgreens’ position was “ludicrous.”

Is that right? Granted, Fox News got the “plus 50 years” thing wrong  – it’s actually life of the author plus 70 years, at least in the United States. But isn’t it otherwise correct? After all, we may disagree about the source of Biblical text, but nobody argues that it was authored after 1923, so it must be in the public domain whoever the author is.

Well, yes and no. Even if the original text is in the public domain, any additional creative work added by the publisher would be copyrightable, either in its own right or as a derivative work.  This might include, for example, a new translation, commentary or images. In this case, it turns out that the Bible Ms. Taylor was trying to copy was an illustrated version. So, in addition to the ancient public domain text, it also contained artwork drawn by a much-less-than-ancient artist, and this artwork was most likely copyrighted. That’s why Walgreens wouldn’t copy it.

Copyright Infringement And Religious Texts

Is the moral of the story that simple: ok to copy old stuff; not ok to copy new stuff?  Aren’t there any special considerations in copyright law for religion? In fact, Congress has provided a narrow exception for the performance of dramatic and musical religious works, codified at 17 U.S.C. § 110. But there is no such exception for the unauthorized copying of religious books. In the absence of such an exception, defendants have asserted a variety of creative defenses when accused of infringing the copyrights in religious texts. Here are a few:

God as Author. In Urantia Foundation v. Maaherra, the subject was the Urantia Book, published in 1955 after it was purportedly dictated by “celestial beings” to a Urantiagroup of psychiatric patients in Chicago. The defendant, who had been distributing unauthorized copies of the book, argued that the plaintiff’s copyright was invalid because celestial beings, like animals or computers, could not be “authors” for copyright purposes. This argument echoes the somewhat tongue-and-cheek issues raised by Thomas Cotter in his article, Gutenberg’s Legacy: Copyright, Censorship and Religious Pluralism. Professor Cotter opined that copyright protection for celestial beings would be problematic because: (1) they live forever, thus violating the Constitutional mandate that copyrights can only last for a “limited term,” and (2) they can’t sign written instruments, so earthly institutions can’t prove that the copyright has been transferred to them. Not surprisingly, the Ninth Circuit sidestepped these  metaphysical arguments by holding that “a work is copyrightable if copyrightability is claimed by the first human beings who” compile and arrange it in a tangible literary form.  Effectively, the god and the prophet are joint authors.

Fraud on the Copyright Office. A twist on the God-as-Author argument was advanced by the defendant in Penguin Books USA v. New Christian MiraclesChurch of the Full Endeavor. That case concerned A Course In Miracles, a religious textbook purportedly dictated by Jesus to psychologist Helen Schucman. In 1975, Jesus directed Schucman to copyright the book. According to Schucman, the son of God “was quite adamant about this.” Unable to register the work on behalf of a “a non-physical author such as Jesus,” Schucman told the Copyright Office the work had been authored by “Anonymous (Helen Schucman).”  The defendants argued that Schucman had no valid copyright because she fraudulently took credit for Jesus’ work. But the Southern District of New York, following the Ninth Circuit’s lead, held that Schucman was close enough to an author for copyright purposes, so there was no fraud.

The First Amendment. Some defendants have argued that applying copyright law to restrict or burden the exercise of religion is a violation of the Establishment Clause and/or the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. This defense did actually work in United Christian Scientists v. Christian Science MBEddyBoard of Directors.  However, that case concerned not the Copyright Act but Private Law 92-60, an ill-conceived attempt (supposedly by Christian Scientists within the Nixon administration) to grant an extra-long copyright term to the works of Mary Baker Eddy. Otherwise, First Amendment arguments have generally been rejected on the grounds that copyright law can be neutrally applied without a court deciding doctrinal disputes or entangling the state in church affairs.

Fair Use. And of course, there is always the fair use defense.  “Religious” copying is not one of the archetypal fair use categories set forth in 17 USC § 107, but it is certainly a non-commercial use, so that should count for something, right?  Well, not always. In Worldwide Church of God v. Philadelphia Church of God, the defendant church had broken off from the plaintiff church, and was distributing copies of both groups’ founding spiritual text. Although the defendant was giving the copies away for free and for clearly religious purposes, the Ninth Circuit rejected its fair use argument because the copies superseded the original work, and because the defendant’s distribution, although not for monetary gain, resulted in a “profit” of sorts, in that it had attracted thousands of new members.

The Fair – And Balanced – Use Defense

Fox News ChannelSo, what do you do if faced with a charge of religious copyright infringement? The fair use defense doesn’t work, so how about the fair and balanced use defense? In other words, call Fox News. That’s what Kelly Taylor did and, unlike all those other defenses asserted by clever copyright lawyers, this one seems to have worked. Hours after Fox News took up her cause and contacted Walgreens’ corporate headquarters, Ms. Taylor received an apologetic email informing her that her order was ready for pickup — at no charge!  Ms. Taylor, happy finally to have her possibly-infringing copies, is “praying that Walgreens learns that the Bible doesn’t belong to anyone, it belongs to everyone.” Meanwhile, Fox News has called Taylor’s quick victory “a teachable moment.”  About what is unclear.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.