Further FCC Assault on Local Zoning - Join Coalition to Fight Proposed Expansion of OTARD Rule

Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact

Best Best & Krieger LLP

The Federal Communications Commission is once again seeking to usurp local authority as part of its agenda for 5G deployment. Last week, the FCC requested comments on a proposal to expand its Over-the-Air Reception Devices Rule. If approved, the Rule would limit localities’ authority to regulate placement of hub and relay antennas of a certain size — regardless of whether an occupant at the site where the equipment is deployed is using the network. In doing so, the FCC seeks to extend a Congressional directive that protects consumers’ right to install satellite dishes (Telecommunications Act of 1996 section 207) to network elements that would otherwise be subject to zoning oversight. Best Best & Krieger LLP is inviting agencies to join a coalition in objecting to this zoning authority encroachment.
 
First adopted in 1999, the OTARD Rule prohibits state and local governments from restricting consumers from installing over-the-air devices to receive over-the-air signals. If a consumer feels that a local rule or ordinance limits the ability to install such a device, a complaint can be filed with the FCC in an effort to force the local government to suspend all enforcement action. But the Rule was designed to solely protect equipment at the consumer’s end: small antennas (1 meter in diameter or less) installed on property within the exclusive use or control of the satellite’s user.
 
Now, the FCC is proposing to extend these protections to hub and relay antennas — equipment 5G providers will use to transmit signals to, and receive signals from, multiple customer locations. This is particularly problematic for local governments because the Rule’s effect may permit 5G providers to install the antennas without notifying local agencies or being subject to local community control.
 
This is not the first time the FCC has expanded the OTARD Rule. In 2000, the Rule was extended from television programming devices to “fixed wireless” antennas and, in 2004, it was extended to protect equipment capable of processing network functionality. But in both cases, the equipment installed had to be used to serve a user at the premises. This proposal eliminates the on-premises user requirement.
 
Comments will be due 30 days from publication in the Federal Register, which is expected to occur at any time. 

 [View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact
more
less

Best Best & Krieger LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.