Historical Fact or Creative Expression? Anastasia Copyright Dispute Proceeds to Trial

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Winston Churchill famously commented in 1939 that Russia was “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.” The same could be said about Grand Duchess Anastasia Romanov, daughter of Russian Tsar Nicholas II, who was rumored to have survived the massacre of the Tsar’s family in 1918. The riddle wrapped in a mystery deepened in the following years, with various women, with varying degrees of psychological problems, claiming to be long-lost daughter Anastasia, presumably entitled to the Tsar’s fortunes hidden away in foreign banks.

The history of these women’s efforts to convince the world and surviving relatives that they were in fact Anastasia Romanov spawned a number of dramatic works, most notably for purposes of this blog post, a fictionalized Play written in the 1940s by French author Marcelle Maurette (later adapted into English in 1952), and a musical version of the Anastasia story written by Terence McNally that opened on Broadway in April 2017. Both the Play and the Musical focused on one particular woman claiming to be Anastasia — Anna Anderson — who spent many years trying to convince the public and surviving members of the royal family of her identity. The rights holders in the Play sued McNally and commercial partner Anastasia Musical LLC for copyright infringement, alleging that the Musical had copied creative elements from the Play going beyond the historical record.  Jean-Etienne de Becdelievre et al. v. Anastasia Musical LLC, 16 Civ. 9471 (SDNY) (AKH). District Judge Hellerstein denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss in January 2017, holding that it was not possible to resolve the issues in dispute by making a “complicated comparison” of the two works and the historical record before answers were filed “and without guidance by experts.” The case proceeded into discovery, limited to the issue of how the Musical was created. The court also directed the plaintiffs to make a submission identifying what specific plot elements, characters, dialogue and scenes had been infringed. Defendants then filed a motion for summary judgment, which was denied by Opinion and Order dated April 2, 2018.

The court began its analysis by articulating the mission to determine “whether the two works are substantially similar, extracting from the analysis any non-copyrightable historical facts.” Judge Hellerstein also confirmed that when a work contains both copyrightable and non-copyrightable material, as was the case here, the appropriate legal standard for judging substantial similarity is the “more discerning ordinary observer test.” The court further acknowledged that because substantial similarity “is customarily an extremely close question of fact, summary judgment has traditionally been frowned upon” in copyright litigation. Ultimately, after a detailed review of the historical record as well as the content of the Play and the Musical, the court concluded that material issues of disputed fact precluded summary judgment.

The decision to deny summary judgment rested on a few “crucial elements” of both the Play and the Musical “that cannot be traced back to the historical record.” The court cited in particular “a much-anticipated meeting” between Anna/Anastasia and her supposed grandmother, the Dowager Empress, resulting in a very emotionally resonant scene in both works in which the Empress finally softens her resistance to believing Anna’s story and agrees to support her as a member of the family. No such meeting ever took place according to any historical evidence. Both works also featured a climactic scene in which  Anna/Anastasia was supposed to be presented to the world at a ceremony, but instead Anna/Anastasia “makes an off-stage decision to reject royalty and wealth, in favor of a simple life.” The court observed, “As with the meeting between Anastasia and the Empress, the presentation scene has no apparent basis in the historical record.”

Defendants argued that the ideas embodied in these overlapping plot developments were scenes a faire that were not subject to copyright protection. The court disagreed, saying plaintiffs’ claim was “limited to a particular expression” of the scenes. The court also rejected defendants’ argument that the Play and Musical were different in “total concept and feel”, citing Second Circuit precedent in Castle Rock Entertainment Inc. v. Carol Publishing Group that “the total concept and feel test… is simply not helpful in analyzing works that, because of their different genres and media, must necessarily have a different concept and feel.”

So a case involving competing dramatic presentations of the Anna Anderson story, and the riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma about whether Anastasia Romanov survived the assassination of the Tsar’s family, will now – barring a settlement – proceed to trial.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.