HSR Practice Alert – FTC is Making Changes to Respond to the “Massive Surge” in HSR Filings

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Yesterday, the FTC announced certain changes in response to the continuing “massive surge” in HSR filings. See Reforming the Pre-Filing Process for Companies Considering Consolidation and a Change in the Treatment of Debt | Federal Trade Commission (ftc.gov).

First, although providing no specifics, the FTC announced that it and DOJ are working together to update the formal HSR rules:  “The FTC is currently in the process of working with the DOJ to update its existing merger filing rules.”

Second, the FTC is reviewing its “voluminous” published database of informal interpretations out of a concern that some of them“ may not reflect modern market realities or the policy position of the Commission.” The FTC has historically provided informal HSR interpretations by email in response to anonymous inquiries, and then published some of those on FTC’s website to provide general, informal guidance. However, the announcement cautioned: “These interpretations are not reviewed or authorized by the Commission and do not carry the force of law.’ The FTC will review these and then “determine the best path forward.”

Third, the FTC changed its treatment of debt in situations where the payoff of debt “benefit[s]” a selling shareholder.  Previously, funds used to payoff target debt at closing could be excluded from the size of transaction in equity deals. The FTC expressed concern that parties were abusing its informal interpretations on this point and “sidestepping” HSR reporting requirements:  “Target companies may be incentivized to take on debt just before an acquisition, so that the acquiring company can retire the debt as part of the deal. These deals then are not being reported to the FTC and the DOJ, which means that merging parties are effectively sidestepping the law and avoiding accountability.”

The FTC’s announcement did not provide a precise definition or list of examples of what types of debt payoff “benefit” a shareholder and fall under the new treatment.  Parties should carefully analyze what type of debt can be deducted.  It appears that at a minimum, payoff of the following two types of debt should now be included when determining the HSR size of transaction in light of FTC’s new guidance: (1) payoff of debt owed to a selling shareholder or (2) payoff of debt incurred by the target in order to make a distribution to a selling shareholder.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.