Illinois Supreme Court Lets Ruling Stand Requiring Two Years of Employment to Support Restrictive Covenant

by K&L Gates LLP
Contact

The enforceability of post-employment restrictive covenants in Illinois suffered a set back on October 14, 2013, when the Illinois Supreme Court refused to review an appellate decision that held that two years of employment was required to enforce a non-compete covenant of an at-will employee when the sole consideration for the covenant was the employment itself. In Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc., the First District Appellate Court held that an at-will employee’s restrictive covenants were not enforceable because his three months of employment before quitting was not adequate consideration. Rather remarkably, the Court rejected the employer’s contention that a restrictive covenant signed at the outset of an at will employment relationship (as opposed to during an on going employment relationship) need not be supported by additional consideration beyond the substantial consideration afforded by the offer of employment itself – i.e., employment, access to customers, access to confidential information, employee benefits, compensation.

In Fifield, Premier Dealership Services acquired a subsidiary of Great America Insurance Company, Eric Fifield’s employer. Premier offered Fifield employment on terms that included standard two-year post-employment non-competition and non-solicitation prohibitions. Fifield became an employee at-will of Premier and even negotiated a provision that the restrictive covenants would not apply if he were terminated without cause in his first year with Premier. Three months later, Fifield resigned and began to work for a competitor. On a motion for a declaratory judgment, the trial court threw out the restrictive covenants and held they were unenforceable due to a lack of adequate consideration.

In its June 24, 2013 opinion, the First District Appellate Court affirmed. Its ruling considered whether there was “adequate” consideration to enforce the agreement, a departure from traditional contract analyses which look only to the existence, not the adequacy, of consideration. The Appellate Court found no meaningful distinction between the fact that Fifield quit his employment as opposed to being terminated and found no difference between signing a restrictive covenant upon hiring rather than during the term of an existing relationship. Focusing on the adequacy of consideration, the court held that when an employee signs a restrictive covenant, the consideration offered by the employment itself is an “illusory benefit” if the employment is at will. While consideration is ordinarily to be determined at the time of contracting, the court held that continued employment would constitute consideration but only if that employment lasted two years or longer.

To say that the ruling is stunning is an understatement. It has commonly been understood that the “substantial continued employment” concept applied only when a covenant was extracted from an existing at-will employee as a condition of continued employment where no new consideration was exchanged. The First District Appellate Court now imposes that obligation when an at-will employee is initially hired. Employers that try to protect their customer relationships and business by entering into restrictive covenants with new or existing at-will employees need to wait two years before they can determine whether the employment constitutes sufficient consideration to support the post-employment restrictions. The “one-size fits all” approach to the court’s “adequacy” analysis does not even consider the breadth or limited nature of the restrictive covenants, such as whether they are pure non-compete provisions or more limited non-solicitation prohibitions.

Key Takeaways
The newfound emphasis on “adequacy” of consideration, largely a glossed-over topic in the past, means that employers will need to provide employees with something other than a job or continued employment if they hope to enforce post-employment restrictions against employees who resign or are terminated before two years are up. Employers should review existing contract templates to determine if consideration beyond employment can be recited for new agreements. Options available to employers include providing employees with agreements to take them out of the at-will context (i.e. give them a set term contract or limit the reasons for termination) or providing them with a tangible benefit, such as stock options, a bonus, severance pay or a raise at the time of contracting. Illinois employers must nevertheless be cautious about a trial or appellate court’s determination as to whether the proposed consideration will be deemed “adequate” to support a post-employment restraint. Indeed, Fifield may simply have opened the floodgates of uncertainty in the post-employment restrictive covenant arena by putting non-competition and non-solicitation agreements on a different footing from other contracts as it invites courts to ignore the traditional maxim that courts only inquire into the existence and not the adequacy of consideration. Care should be taken to make certain that adequate consideration is given at the time of contracting, although for now what is “adequate” continues to be unclear.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

K&L Gates LLP
Contact
more
less

K&L Gates LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.