January EU Competition Newsletter

Digital and Pharma Merger Cases Raise Worry of Enforcement Gap in EU Merger Control

Financial Conduct Authority Probes Competition in the Mortgage Sector

Italian Competition Authority Probes Major Insurers for Anticompetitive Public Statements

The French Competition Authority Speaks for the Hard of Hearing

The Italian Competition Authority Opens In-depth Investigation into the Agricultural Insurance

German Banks' Mobile Payment System Unconditionally Approved

French Supreme Court (Re-)Endorses E-commerce Discounting


Digital and Pharma Merger Cases Raise Worry of Enforcement Gap in EU Merger Control

Introduction

On 7 October 2016, the EU Commission launched a public consultation ("the Consultation") on the functioning of certain procedural and jurisdictional aspects of EU merger control as set out in Council Regulation No. 139/2004 ("the EU Merger Regulation").

The EU Merger Regulation is one of the main instruments of EU competition law and it grants the EU Commission exclusive competence to vet certain large scale mergers defined by a number of turnover-based jurisdictional thresholds. Its principal objective is to ensure that competition in the internal market is not distorted or restricted by companies engaging in mergers or "concentrations" (as they are referred to in the EU merger regulation).

The Consultation builds on the feedback received from the EU Commission's White Paper of 2014 entitled "Towards More Effective EU Merger Control" (COM (2014) 449 Final) ("2014 White Paper") but also highlights recent worries that the acquisition of certain fledgling technology and pharmaceutical companies with significant potential may be escaping appropriate EU merger control scrutiny.

The EU Commission has invited comments from businesses, trade associations and public authorities, which closed recently, on the 13th of January 2017.

Background

The EU Merger Regulation, which was originally adopted in 1989 and came into force in the year 1990, has been the subject of regular reviews (notably those in 2003 and from 2013 onwards) to assess its functioning and identify possible areas for refinement, improvement and simplification of its provisions.

In the 2014 White Paper the EU Commission put forward a cocktail of highly controversial reforms, namely the proposed regulation of minority non-controlling shareholdings and on the other highly technical and procedural refinements such the simplification of the notification process for certain categories of merger that normally do not raise competition concerns.

Following the results of the feedback on the 2104 White Paper the introduction of controversial proposals to review minority non-controlling shareholdings were shelved (at least for the time being) but they considered that proposals to take certain transactions that are not a threat to competition outside the Commission's merger scrutiny should be taken forward.

Generally however it concluded that the EU merger control system worked well and that no fundamental overall of the system was needed.

However, following on from the above, recent experience in enforcing the EU merger control rules showed that the effectiveness of current solely turnover- based jurisdictional thresholds should also be a subject of further consultation.

The Consultation

The Consultation principally covers the following areas.

  1. Review of turnover thresholds: whether it is appropriate to amend the solely turnover based jurisdictional threshold to catch highly valued acquirers of target companies principally in the digital and pharma sectors that have not yet generated substantial turnover and are at the moment slipping EU merger scrutiny.
  2. Simplification of the merger control process: whether certain categories of cases that do not generally raise competition concerns can be removed altogether from the EU merger control net.

In addition the Consultation covers a number of other more detailed technical and procedural reforms primarily relating to the referral of cases between the EU Commission and the Member States and the other workings of the EU Merger Regulation. In the interests of space, these more technical proposals are not covered in this article.

Review of turnover thresholds

Currently the EU merger control regime only applies if the turnover based jurisdictional thresholds apply as set out in Article 1 of the EU Merger Regulation. However, a debate has emerged on the effectiveness of these turnover-based jurisdictional thresholds. The issues turn on whether these thresholds allow the capture of all transactions which could potentially have an impact on competition in the internal market.

Recent experience under the EU Merger Regulation has shown that transactions in certain crucial sectors of the economy could be slipping the net. The sector most affected is the digital economy where new services/product offerings are able to build up a significant user base before the business concerned is able to earn a substantial turnover. Businesses such as these can have a significant impact on the relevant market’s competitive landscape.

Certain tech business models may also involve collecting and analysing large amounts of data. The initial gathering phase does not generate, in most cases, significant turnover. Data gatherers can also have a similar marked effect on competition within their sector.

Therefore the EU Commission has concluded that players in the digital economy may have considerable actual or potential market impact. This impact is usually reflected in high acquisition values despite the fact that little or no turnover has been generated.

Acquisitions of such companies with no substantial turnover are unlikely to be captured under the current turnover-based thresholds under the EU Merger Regulation. This is despite the fact that the acquired company may already play a competitive role, hold commercially valuable data and/or have considerable market potential for the future.

As part of the Consultation the Commission is seeking views as to whether it should complement the existing turnover based jurisdictional thresholds of the EU Merger Regulation with additional notification requirements based on additional criteria such the transaction value. 

But it is not just in the digital economy where an enforcement gap may exist. Other sectors also bear consideration such as the pharmaceutical industry. The EU Commission cites a number of instances where major pharmaceutical companies have entered into high value acquisitions of small bio-tech companies which predominantly concentrate their activities on researching and developing new treatments which may have significant impact on the market but do not yet generate substantial turnover.

Simplification Process

In December 2013 the Commission adopted a package of measures ("the Simplification Process") aimed at simplifying merger control procedures to the greatest possible extent without having to resort to amending the provisions of the EU Merger Regulation itself.

The simplified procedure allows companies to submit less market share and other information than the full merger notification needed under the EU Merger Regulation which helps reduce the burden on business.

The Simplification Package resulted in a widening of the scope of the application of the simplified procedure for non-problematic cases as well as streamlining and simplifying the forms for notifying mergers to the Commission. Since that package entered into force on 1 January 2014, the number of cases dealt with under the simplified procedure has increased between January 2014 – September 2016 to around 69%.

The Commission Notice on the Simplified Procedure ("the Notice") applies to each of the following categories of concentration):

(i)Non-EEA Joint Ventures: These are transactions where two or more undertakings acquire joint control of a joint venture provided that the joint venture has no or negligible actual or foreseen activities in the EEA where the turnover of the contributed assets is less than €100 million in the EEA and the total value of the assets transferred to the joint venture is less than €100 million at the time of notification.

(ii)No Overlapping Activities: These cases are where two or more undertakings merge or where one or more undertakings acquire sole or joint control of another undertaking provided that none of the parties to the concentration are engaged in business activities in the same product and geographic market or in a product market which is upstream or downstream from the product market in which any other party to the concentration is engaged.

(iii) Overlapping Activities below Certain Market Share Thresholds: Transactions where two or more undertakings merge and the combined market share of all the parties to the transaction is in the context of horizontal relationships is less than 20% or in the case of vertical relationships 30%.

(iv)Acquiring Sole Control: Transactions where a party is to acquire sole control of an undertaking over which it already has joint control; and

(v) Low Concentration: Transactions where two or more undertakings merge and both of the following conditions are fulfilled:(a) the combined horizontal market share of all parties concerned is less than 50%; and (b) the increment of the HHI index resulting from the transaction is below 150.

The EU Commission under the Consultation is now seeking views as to whether any or all of the above transactions currently subject to the simplified procedure such as the creation of non- EEA joint ventures should be excluded from the scope of the EU Commission’s merger review altogether. This would require amendments to the EU Merger Regulation. The Commission hopes that by making the procedure simpler it could further cut costs and reduce the administrative burden on businesses.

Conclusion

The EU Commission's current initiative to cut the costs of notifications and reduce the administrative burden on businesses in non-problematic cases is to be widely welcomed as are making other procedural aspects of the EU Merger Regulation process more efficient.

The unknown quantity in this Consultation will be the third parties’ reaction to the extension of the EU Commission's jurisdiction to transactions of high value. Whilst the high level case for those extra controls is argued well in the Consultation paper, the way, and crucially, the level at which they are introduced is important because it could impose more, not less, administrative burden and cost.

This article first appeared in Governance + Compliance Magazine.

Financial Conduct Authority Probes Competition in the Mortgage Sector

On 12 December 2016, the Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA") launched a market study into the residential mortgage market to ascertain whether competition in that market is working as well as it could and to identify possible measures to improve competition to the benefit of consumers.

The market study is being conducted pursuant to the FCA's regulatory powers under the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 ("FSMA").

The launch of the market study follows the FCA's Call for Inputs in 2015 seeking stakeholders’ views on the ways in which competition and benefits for consumers in the mortgage sector could be enhanced. In Spring 2016, the FCA published a summary of what had emerged from the Call for Inputs and announced its intention to open a market study into competition in this sector. Following this announcement, the FCA officially launched its market study and its terms of reference in December 2016.

According to the terms of reference the market study will focus on consumers' ability to make effective choices and the tools available (including advice) to make those choices. The market study will also analyse if the commercial arrangement between lenders, brokers and other players lead to conflicts of interest or created a lack of incentives to the detriment of consumers. The FCA states that it wishes to ensure that there are opportunities for better technological solutions to solve the issues it flags up in the market study including a greater use of digital channels to give information or advice.

The market study will focus on first charge residential mortgages which includes new mortgages, remortgages, internal switching as well as further advance and equity release. The study will cover the activities of firms (including estate agents, developers and generally any firms that aids consumers to make decisions) and consumers across the consumer journey. It will not cover commercial mortgages or second charge commercial mortgages.

Two principal questions the market study will examine are as follows:

  • at each stage of the mortgage process, do the available tools (advice, price comparison websites, online calculations) exist to help consumers make effective decisions?
  • do commercial agreements between lenders, brokers and other players lead to conflicts of interest or produce a lack of incentives or compete effectively to the detriment of consumers?

The study will also include a review of the mortgage process , including an analysis of whether the current framework favours certain distribution or business models.

Mortgage lenders will need to provide relevant information regarding their arrangements with intermediaries and as such should review these arrangements carefully to ensure the compliance with competition law and the current regulation. 

An interim report should be available in summer 2017, setting out the FCA's analysis and preliminary conclusions. This will provide stakeholders with an opportunity to comment prior to publishing the final report in early 2018.

If the FCA identifies concerns following the conclusion of the market study it can take a range of actions under its regulatory powers under FSMA to help promote more effective competition. These include amending regulatory rules, introducing firm-specific remedies or enforcement action, publishing general guidance or proposing enhanced industry self-regulation. In addition if they found existing rules acted as barriers at entry or innovation they could propose removing or amending existing rules.

The FCA could using its powers as a concurrent competition regulator refer one or more issues to the Competition and Markets Authority for further investigation as a market investigation reference.

Italian Competition Authority Probes Major Insurers for Anticompetitive Public Statement

On 15 December 2016, the Italian Competition Authority (the "ICA") launched an in-depth investigation against twelve leading Italian insurance companies including the Unipol Group. The officers of those two groups released public statements to the insurance market, on the elimination of the competitive dynamics in the price of the civil liability insurance market services and their respective pricing strategies related to their expected insurance premium increases.

The ICA found that such statements may be considered anticompetitive as it eliminates the uncertainty on the future price strategies and supports the expectation that any increases, being generalised among the major players, do not follow the risk of losing customers which could result in an illegal restrictive agreement between the major players on a possible end of the "price war". The ICA considered that these public market statements breached competition law rules as it forecasted the elimination of competition on both motor insurance costs and the relevant pricing strategies. Therefore, the ICA alleged that the conduct of the two mentioned groups of companies would be considered as an anticompetitive agreement in breach of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the "TFEU").

However, the alleged breach has yet to be proven at this stage and the investigation continues.

The French Competition Authority Speaks for the Hard of Hearing

Suspecting the high price of hearing aid devices to be the cause of a low rate of ownership in France, the French Competition Authority (the "FCA") conducted last year a broad market survey and public consultation to define any competition-related issues. See https://www.bryancave.com/fr/thought-leadership/eu-competition-law-update.html#hearing.

In light of its investigation, the FCA has identified two main competition issues. First, the FCA considered that the frequent linking of sales of hearing aids with related services prevents patients from freely choosing between the various offers, and as such, obliges them to pay immediately for services (e.g., fitting, follow-up and inspection) which will be provided only over several years. Second, the FCA identified another issue related to the limited number of hearing aid specialists, who are license- based on a national quota which impedes the supply of services and restricts the hiring of qualified personnel by new market players.

On 14 December 2016, the FCA published its official recommendations aimed at ensuring quality of care and customer satisfaction.

First, in order to stop the “entrance fee” observed, the FCA recommended separating the initial purchase of the hearing aid (including device and initial fitting and services during the first year) from the purchase of subsequent follow-up services provided in subsequent years. This separation should enable patients to better compare the different services required for their needs.

On this point, however, certain professionals had expressed the view that separate services would lead to health risks due to non-use or improper use of hearing aids or the lack of regular inspections. Nevertheless, the main health risk was characterized by the FCA as the paucity of hearing aid sales particularly in light of the finding that millions of patients currently lack a needed hearing device. Moreover, the FCA considered that the risk of improper use may be resolved through public information campaigns and systematic reminders aimed at educating patients as to proper use of the hearing aid and an appropriate follow-up. Finally, the FCA noted that introducing a system of medical records could be useful to enhance and ensure a better patient follow-up care, and in particular for patients moving to a different area or even for those who change their hearing aid specialist.

Second, the FCA also recommended to remove or increase the quotas used to determine the number of hearing aid specialists trained each year in order to allow the new entrants to expand their networks across France. This stimulation of competition should also facilitate access to hearing aids for patients due to a decrease in prices resulting from the additional supply.

The Italian Competition Authority Opens In-depth Investigation into the Agricultural Insurance Sector for Abuse of Dominance

On 19 October 2016, the Italian Competition Authority (the "ICA") opened an in-depth investigation against the Italian Consortium named Consorzio di difesa della produzione agricola di Trento, ("CODIPRA"), which promotes initiatives aimed to protect Italian agricultural businesses from the damages caused by adverse weather conditions.

In particular, the ICA stated that CODIPRA, which enjoys a dominant position on the market of the brokerage of State contributions, would use this almost monopolistic power to exclude its only competitor Coop Di Italia ("Coop"), an Italian cooperative enterprise from the market.

The ICA found that CODIPRA would be boycotting Coop's brokerage activities, by applying discounts to the clients interested in Coop’s commercial proposals which were, de facto not replicable by the mentioned competitor.

The ICA alleged that the conduct of CODIPRA would amount to an abuse of dominance in breach of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the "TFEU").

The alleged breach has yet to be proven at this stage and the investigation continues. However, the ICA has opined that such conduct, if proven, would amount to an infringement of Article 102 of the TFEU on the grounds that: (i) it would adversely affect trade within the EU; and (ii) CODIPRA has achieved a dominant position on the relevant market thanks to favorable law provisions.

German Banks' Mobile Payment System Unconditionally Approved

On 25 November 2016, the (the “FCO”) announced that it raised no objection to the new payment function known as "Kwitt," with which savings bank customers can send money from one mobile phone to another. Since there were concerns that the project, which was founded by otherwise independent savings banks, could lead to the limitation of competition, the FCO felt duty bound to investigate the function under its competition powers.

The new system works as the German joint banking computing centres’ agreed to implement the function into the savings banks' mobile applications, allowing the participating banks and their customers to make mobile-to-mobile payments within their circle of contacts. The savings banks announced that their apps will be equipped with this new function after a short update. Provided that every savings bank uses this function, around 4.5 million app users could send money to other mobile devices.

It will also be possible to reach payment recipients outside of the savings bank group; however, this procedure would be more complex. In contrast, the request for payment will only be possible among customers, who are respectively registered with Kwitt.

With the new Kwitt function, the savings banks come into competition with third party payment vendors, who (independent of any affiliation to a banking group) are offering similar applications on the market and licenses to financial institutions. Adding to the convenience for consumers, savings banks that want to offer their customers this payment method receive the product from their computing centers and do not have to develop it themselves or purchase it from third-party vendors. The FCO assumes that most savings banks will make this function available to their customers.

Even though the Kwitt function clearly involved a level of horizontal co-ordination between the savings banks, and provided a coordinated product on the market to the detriment of independent third party application providers, the FCO did not have any competition concerns regarding this project. This was because (as stated by the FCO in its press announcement) "any such restriction is outweighed by considerable efficiencies because with this easy form of money transfer the individual savings bank customer is not limited to transferring money only to customers of his or her own bank."

Meanwhile, there have been plans between the savings and cooperative banks to introduce a joint payment function under the name of "cash carrier". Due to the inter-bank cooperation, questions regarding competition must be continually raised since the cooperation partners would have privileged access to a considerable portion of the customer basis in Germany. The FCO has not made a final decision on this matter since the project has not been continually pursued.

French Supreme Court (Re-)Endorses E-commerce Discounting

On 8 November 2016 the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) overturned the decision of the Paris Court of Appeal of 21 January 2015, which had found that extremely low prices practiced by an internet site constituted unfair competition.

In the considered case, JPL Café Coton ("Café Coton"), a French textile company selling through a French and international exclusive and selective distribution network, sued BLT Développement ("BLT"), the operator of a merchant website owned by the family of controversial businessman Bernard Tapie, for having marketed Café Coton’s products at very low prices and without having entered into a selective distribution agreement with Café Coton. According to Café Coton, this represented a violation of the terms of the network agreements prohibiting out-of-network sales for resale and depreciated the image of its brand.

BLT argued that it acquired the goods in question from an Italian company which had itself acquired them from the Italian subsidiary of Café Coton, neither of which companies had entered into a selective distribution agreement with Café Coton. Therefore, BLT claimed that it did not participate in the violation of any ban on resale outside the Café Coton network, and that in consequence it was free to resell the Café Coton products at prices it deemed fit.

In its ruling, the Paris Court of Appeal had found that BLT did not violate or harm the Café Coton network, but nonetheless held BLT liable for unfair competition by marketing Café Coton's products at prices which were excessively low, i.e., from 17% to 37% lower than those generally practiced by Café Coton distributors. These low pricing practices were deemed, ipso facto, by the Court of Appeal to constitute unfair competition by taking advantage of Café Coton’s reputation and causing a diversion of customers and damaging the brand’s image. The Court of Appeal thus held BLT liable for €50,000 of moral damages in this regard.

In overturning the Court of Appeal decision, the Cour de Cassation ruled that because BLT’s supply was not unlawful, the resale of the products at low prices did not, without more, either constitute a fault, harm the network or depreciate the products' image. The case has been remanded to other judges at the Paris Court of Appeal.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Contact
more
less

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.