Job Creation: Campaign slogan and patent infringement defense?

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC
Contact

In an opinion by the New Jersey District Court in December, the Court found that a requested preliminary injunction against infringement of US Patent No. 6,293,731 could shut down a port dredging project and jeopardize the creation of 2,000 projected jobs and $12 million in tax revenue . “Therefore, the public interest weighs in favor of denying the preliminary injunction.” Weeks Marine, Inc. v. TDM America, LLC, 2-11-cv-03850 (NJD December 14, 2011, Order) (Salas, M.J.) (The full opinion is available on pacer, or you can email me for a copy).

The basic requirements for granting a preliminary injunction are the same in patent cases as in any case:

1) likelihood of success on the merits at trial

2) irreparable harm to the plaintiff absent the preliminary injunction

3) balance of harm weighs in favor of the injunction and

4) consideration of the public interest.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC

Written by:

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide