Joint and Several Liability Explained

Cranfill Sumner LLP
Contact

A common question I get is whether North Carolina follows joint and several liability.  The answer is “Yes.”  (See…lawyers don’t always answer with: ”it depends”). 

The next question I get is what does it mean. 

In short, joint and several liability arises when there are multiple defendants and the jury finds that each of those defendants were at fault and their fault was a cause of a plaintiff’s injuries.  There is no apportionment of fault with joint and several liability.

To illustrate, let’s take a simple negligence case where there are 2 defendants and a $100,000 jury verdict.  The jury determines that both defendants were at fault (negligent) and their fault was a cause of plaintiff’s damages.  The jury doesn’t determine percentages of fault or which defendant was more at fault.  Rather, both defendants are “jointly and severally liable” for the $100,000.  That means plaintiff can recover the entire $100,000 from both ($50,000 each) or the entire $100,000 from just one defendant.  If the plaintiff recovers from just one defendant then that defendant has a right of contribution against the other defendant to try and collect its share (up to $50,000 in this example).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Cranfill Sumner LLP

Written by:

Cranfill Sumner LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Cranfill Sumner LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide