Kaiser Opinion May Affect Ability to Stack Policies issued by Single Carrier

by Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Policyholders should continue to assert that limits can be stacked in situations where there is continuing damage, despite the California Court of Appeals’ latest decision in Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 29 (2nd Dist. April 8, 2013). In its most recent encounter with asbestos bodily injury claims, and following its earlier decision in London Market Insurers v. Superior Court, 146 Cal. App. 648 (2007), the Court of Appeals in Kaiser Cement considered whether horizontal or vertical exhaustion of insurance coverage is required when determining how to allocate for continuing damage cases. Unfortunately, the opinion makes little practical sense, and is unlikely the last word on this subject.

From 1944 to the 1970s, Kaiser Cement (“Kaiser”) manufactured products containing asbestos. By 2004, more than 24,000 claimants had filed products liability suits against Kaiser alleging that they had suffered bodily injury, including asbestosis and various cancers, as a result of their exposure to Kaiser's asbestos products. Four insurers, including Truck Insurance (“Truck”), provided primary insurance to Kaiser from 1947 to 1987.

For the purposes of this case, Kaiser had selected the Truck CGL policy in effect in 1974 to respond initially to all claims that allege asbestos exposure during that year. That policy contained a $500,000 “per occurrence” liability limit, with no annual limit and no limit to the number of occurrences. By October 2004, Truck’s indemnity payments for asbestos bodily injury claims exceeded $50 million and included at least 39 claims that resulted in payments in excess of $500,000.

At issue here was who was responsible to indemnify Kaiser for asbestos claims that exceeded the 1974 primary policy’s $500,000 per occurrence limit. Kaiser and Truck contended that appellant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSOP”), which issued a first-level excess policy to Kaiser for 1974, was responsible to pay claims over $500,000. ICSOP disagreed: It contended that primary insurance limits must be “stacked” such that all available primary insurance policies (i.e. all Truck policies issued to Kaiser between 1964 and 1983, as well as primary policies issued to Kaiser by the three other carriers between 1947 and 1987) are exhausted before any excess insurer need indemnify Kaiser for asbestos bodily injury claims.

In June of 2011, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion in which it concluded that under the language of the 1974 primary policy and principles of California law, Truck’s maximum exposure for asbestos bodily injury claims was $500,000 per occurrence – in effect agreeing with the trial court that, based on the policy language, once Truck contributed $500,000 per occurrence, its obligation to Kaiser ceased.

The California Supreme Court granted review, and, in October of 2012, transferred the matter to back to the Court of Appeals with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider it in light of State of California v. Continental Ins. Co. 55 Cal.4th 186 (2012). That decision held that there is no general rule in California prohibiting the stacking of insurance policy limits, but at the same time permitting policy language to accomplish the same result.

Reviewing the matter again, the Court of Appeals concluded that the policies Truck issued to Kaiser cannot be stacked. Despite ruling that the primary policies must be exhausted before the ICSOP policy is triggered, the court ruled that for purposes of determining Truck’s obligation under nineteen years of primary coverage, only one occurrence limit applied under the language of the Truck policies. Specifically, the court reasoned that the following language in Truck’s primary policies constituted an anti-stacking provision: “the limit of the Company’s liability as respects any occurrence ... shall not exceed the per occurrence limit designated in the Declarations.” The court stated that “[w]e do not know what more Truck could have said when the policy was drafted ... to make clear that its policy’s limitation-of-liability term was an absolute cap on its per occurrence exposure—and, as such, it is fundamentally inconsistent with ‘stacking’ the liability limits of the several Truck policies.” Notably, the court held that the anti-stacking ruling applied only to Truck’s policies, and declined to consider whether, in light of applicable policy language, the limits of other carriers’ policies could be stacked.

The practicality of the Court’s decision is questionable. If over the course of nineteen years, Kaiser had had a different policy with a different carrier each year, it would have had nineteen different policy limits that it would need to exhaust before reaching the excess carrier’s policy coverage (similar to the situation in Continental). But, over the course of the nineteen years, Kaiser had nineteen policies with the same carrier, and, accordingly, it would only have one limit, according to Kaiser Cement. Such an anomalous result does not comport with an insured’s “reasonable expectations.” The Court, however, distinguished Continental on grounds that the policy language in Continental was slightly different in that it provided that “the limit of the Company’s liability under this policy shall not exceed the applicable amount [listed as the policy limit],” whereas the Truck policy provided that “the limit of the company’s liability as respects any occurrence ... shall not exceed the per occurrence limit designated in the Declarations.”

The case will very likely head back up to the California Supreme Court, so we’ll have to wait and see whether it will view the Court of Appeals’ distinctions in the same regard.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Farella Braun + Martel LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.