King v. Burwell – Will the Supreme Court Tip the ACA Dominos? Part 2

by Locke Lord LLP
Contact

In our previous blog post, we evaluated the legal issues at stake in King v. Burwell. We will now examine some of the ramifications of a Supreme Court decision that goes against the Obama Administration, assuming such were to occur.

Reasonable minds can agree, and often the ACA’s opponents strongly emphasize, that the ACA only authorizes the availability of subsidies to low and moderate income consumers who purchase health insurance coverage “through an Exchange established by the State.” This phrase – “through an Exchange established by the State” – is repeated nine times throughout the ACA. Therefore, argue the plaintiffs in King and similar cases, the use of ACA subsidies to reduce the cost of health insurance purchased through Exchanges that are run by the federal government is prohibited. The plaintiffs further argue that the U.S. Department of Treasury cannot change the statutory provisions of the ACA through its own rule-making and magically make subsidies available to consumers purchasing health insurances on federally-run Exchanges.

Armed with the pivotal seven word phrase (quoted above) excerpted from the ACA, King v. Burwell lines up four residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia against the Obama Administration. Virginia’s Exchange is run by the federal government. The four King plaintiffs did not want to purchase comprehensive health insurance of the type required by the ACA for most Americans. The plaintiffs also believed they would be exempt from the individual mandate because such insurance coverage, if not subsidized for them, would be too expensive.

The King plaintiffs contend that, because they received subsidies to which they should not have been entitled under the ACA, they lost the ability to qualify for the unaffordability exception to the individual mandate. The unaffordability exception applies when the cheapest available plan offered on the Exchange is more than eight percent of a consumer’s income. The relief plaintiffs are seeking is to eliminate their eligibility for federal tax subsidies for health insurance that could be purchased on Virginia’s federal Exchange which, in turn, would reinstate plaintiffs’ eligibility for the unaffordability exception. In the end, if the plaintiffs were to prevail, they would neither be required to purchase ACA-compliant health insurance nor be required to pay an individual mandate tax penalty.

If the Supreme Court were to decide King v. Burwell on grounds that permitted the King plaintiffs to achieve their objectives, federal subsidies would likely be lost to consumers residing in states with federal Exchanges and, perhaps, those states with partnership Exchanges as well. This may result in a staggering 6.4 million Americans losing subsidized health insurance, as estimated by some commentators.

Moreover, the individual mandate could be rendered moot for Americans with modest incomes residing in states with federal or partnership Exchanges. With unsubsidized health insurance now unaffordable in their states, many more Americans would no longer be facing a tax penalty for failing to purchase quality health insurance. Further, in these states with federal or partnership Exchanges, the employer mandate would seem to become unsupportable. Without the risk that the federal government would have to pay subsidies to employees otherwise eligible for affordable, quality health coverage from their large employers, there is no rational basis in the ACA’s shared responsibility policy for the federal government to enforce the employer mandate in states that are not running their own Exchanges, and violations of the employer mandate in such states would not seem to yield penalties against offending employers.

The potential outcome of King v. Burwell has not captivated the nation’s attention in the same dramatic fashion as during the run-up to the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. It is understandable why some – whether ACA supporter, opponent or agnostic – view the King decision as being narrow in scope and without the ability to significantly alter the course of the ACA. However, if the Supreme Court chooses not to reinforce a key element of the ACA by extending subsidies to federal Exchanges, it is very possible that the nation’s newly improved non-group health insurance marketplace could begin to crumble.

How long could health insurers afford to offer guaranteed-issue insurance in the federal Exchange states, without underwriting for pre-existing conditions or other risk factors, after the individual mandate – which already is viewed by some as being too tepid – suffers yet another blow? Although Congress has the power to fix the ACA’s language to permit subsidies for eligible consumers purchasing health insurance on Exchanges in all states, early indications of proposed legislation would offer President Obama the ability to save the subsidies, but perhaps only at the expense of an outright loss of both the individual mandate and employer mandate. The President has already rebuked such proposals. Although some Governors have signaled that they would establish state-based Exchanges in the event the Administration loses in King v. Burwell, there remain potentially daunting obstacles to bringing these intentions to fruition. Governors may be willing, but state legislatures may have opposing political priorities or may be unwilling to tap into state budgets that are still recovering from the Great Recession to appropriate necessary Exchange funding.

Bottom line: the ACA dominos seem to be lined up once again awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court. If the Obama Administration suffers a loss in King v. Burwell, millions of Americans may lose subsidized health insurance coverage. Moreover, the ACA’s framework of shared responsibility could begin to slowly erode, at least in those 34 states which have not yet established their own Exchanges. And, with so many Americans and U.S. businesses affected, we have to ask whether this could cause the health insurance market reforms of the ACA to unravel. Stay tuned – the suspense is almost over!

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Locke Lord LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Locke Lord LLP
Contact
more
less

Locke Lord LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.