In our recent alert Loan Origination Under AIFMD2: A Guide, on loan origination under the revised Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD2), we noted that the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) would be consulting on further measures required to implement AIFMD2. These include draft guidelines and regulatory technical standards (RTS) on the specific characteristics, selection, and calibration of liquidity management tools (LMTs) on which ESMA is now consulting.
The RTS supplement the liquidity management provisions for open-ended funds under AIFMD2 to ensure better alignment between asset liquidity and redemption terms and to mitigate material investor dilution and potential first-mover advantage, in particular for funds investing in inherently illiquid assets.
The consultations are open until 8 October 2024, and the RTS are due to be finalised by 16 April 2025. By 16 April 2026, EU member states are required to implement AIFMD2.
We have set out below the principal points of how the rules apply to the managers of open-ended EU AIFs (AIFMs), along with a table detailing the key requirements for each LMT as set out in the proposals. The consultations also relate to liquidity management under the UCITS Directive, which is outside the scope of this note.
Main Points
- The AIFM has primary responsibility for liquidity risk management (as well as for selection, calibration, activation, and deactivation of LMTs) and is to use LMTs in conjunction with other threshold considerations, such as fund structuring, governance, and risk management.
- Activation and deactivation of LMTs do not exempt an AIFM from its obligations on best execution, eligibility of assets, fair valuation, liquidity risk management, and fair treatment of investors (as well as ensuring consistency between investment strategy, liquidity profile, and redemption policy of the fund).
- Although there are some specific provisions for funds that invest in inherently illiquid assets (or are usually liquid but can become less liquid during stressed market conditions), in general the requirements apply for all types of funds.
- An AIFM will be required to:
- Assess suitability of the LMTs in relation to a fund’s investment strategy, structure, liquidity profile, and redemption and distribution policies
- Give due consideration that the selected tools are as comprehensive as possible and will allow effective management of the fund’s liquidity in both normal and stressed market conditions
- Ensure LMTs do not alter the fund’s investment objectives, policy, profile, or characteristics (for instance, change the fund from open- to closed-ended on activation of a suspension tool)
- Demonstrate to its national competent authority (NCA) that activation and calibration of the selected LMT are in the best interests of all investors and are appropriate and effective for prevailing market conditions, be they normal or stressed
- Select more LMTs and/or other liquidity measures at their discretion and use tools individually or in combination in each instance
- Implement detailed policies and procedures to operate, administer, activate, and deactivate any LMTs (the draft guidelines set out a list of minimum provisions to include)
- The depositary to an AIF will be required to verify that the AIFM has in place documented LMT procedures.
Selection of Specified LMTs
- An AIFM will be required to select at least two LMTs (only one for a manager managing an AIF that is authorised as a money market fund) from Annex V points 2-8: redemption fee, swing pricing, dual pricing, anti-dilution levy, redemption gates, extension of notice periods, and redemptions in kind. They can be used only if selected and included in the fund’s rules and instruments of incorporation.
- ESMA encourages AIFMs to consider the merit of selecting at least one anti-dilution tool (such as redemption fee, swing pricing, dual pricing, or anti-dilution levy) for use under normal conditions and at least one quantitative-based tool (such as redemption gate or extension of notice period) for use under stressed market conditions.
- Two of the listed LMTs — suspension of subscriptions, repurchases, and redemptions, and side pockets (Annex V points 1 and 9 of AIFMD2) — are available to AIFMs without the need to ‘pre-select’ them, but only in exceptional circumstances and where justified with regard to the interests of the investors.
- An AIFM cannot select swing and dual pricing only as its two LMTs (on the basis that this may lead to duplicating impacts and have the potential to undermine broader liquidity risk management objectives).
- Unless solely marketed to professional investors or for AIFs that are EU-regulated exchange-traded funds tracking an index, redemptions in kind can be used for redemption requests only by professional investors and if the redemption corresponds to a pro rata share of the assets held by the AIF.
What Does This Mean for Managers Now?
The AIFMD2 rules and recommendations, thankfully, do not apply a one-size-fits-all approach and do recognise that the manager has primary responsibility for liquidity risk management and can account for different asset classes, jurisdictions, and market conditions. The end result points toward more regulatory parameters in liquidity management frameworks and more scrutiny and transparency over both a manager’s detailed policies and procedures to operate, administer, activate, and deactivate its chosen LMT and being able to demonstrate to its NCA that the selected LMTs are in the best interest of all investors and appropriate for prevailing market conditions. This comes alongside a degree of operational discretion and the ability to continue where possible with established methods of liquidity management that allow manager flexibility across asset classes. However, we will want to monitor the outcome of the consultative process and the final details of the rules and recommendations as well as any potential issues with uneven implementation by member states.
Application of AIFMD2 to UK AIFMs
Although the new rules on LMTs in AIFMD2 will not apply directly to firms authorised under the UK AIFM rules, we would note the unusual ability (albeit limited to investor protection or financial stability risks and certain provisos) for EU27 regulators to require a third-country AIFM marketing an open-ended fund in Europe to activate or deactivate the suspension of redemptions/subscriptions.
In addition to specific disclosures on LMTs set out in the table above, an AIFM will be required to:
- Provide appropriate disclosure on the selection, calibration, and conditions for activation/deactivation of the selected and available LMTs in the fund documentation, constitutional documents, marketing, and periodic reports, including that the main purpose of LMTs is to facilitate fair treatment of investors by protecting the ones that remain invested in the fund from bearing the costs generated by subscription/redemption activities of other investors
- Incorporate information in precontractual materials so that investors can incorporate liquidity costs into their investment decisions and avoid unintentional counterproductive effects (e.g., preemptive redemptions or actions to reduce the effectiveness of LMTs)
- Consider including disclosures on a fund’s historical use of LMTs in its periodic reporting (e.g., cost implications of redemptions)
- Carefully consider timing of disclosures to balance transparency benefits with potential risk of unintended consequences, including, for example, disclosing a range of factors for any adjustments (rather than specific figures) to mitigate the risk of stigma effects or frontrunning that could jeopardise the LMTs’ effectiveness
- Disclose appropriately the possibility of activating suspensions and using side pockets (without prejudice to the possibility of their activation/use when not specified in precontractual materials)
[1] The draft guidelines (at paragraph 6.5.3.1) define exceptional circumstances as unforeseen events and/or operational/regulatory environments that materially impact the fund’s ability to carry out normal business functions and activities, and that would temporarily prevent the manager from meeting the funding obligations arising from the liabilities side of the balance sheet. A nonexhaustive list includes asset valuation difficulties; severe liquidity issues (e.g., due to margin calls or significant size withdrawal) in which executing the sale of underlying assets could cause liquidity issues for the fund (e.g., large discounts in asset sales or large dilution of remaining investors); critical cyber incident that impacts the fund, the manager, and/or the fund’s services provider’s capacity to operate; unforeseen market closures, trading restrictions, and closure of trading venues; severe financial and/or political crisis; identification of significant fraud; and natural disaster.
[View source.]