Long-Awaited Colorado Court of Appeals Stresscon Decision a Mixed Bag

by Wilson Elser

Extends Notice-Prejudice Rule to Voluntary Payments under Liability Policies, Finds “Other Insurance” Clauses Curb Double Damages Penalties and Leaves Pertinent Bad Faith Question Unanswered

The Colorado Court of Appeals entered an order on September 12, 2013, finding that an insured’s voluntary, pre-suit settlement of a claim without its insurer’s consent was subject to the “notice-prejudice rule.” Stresscon Corporation v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, 2013 COA 131. Nos. 11CA1239 & 11CA1582. Pursuant to that rule, there is a rebuttable presumption of prejudice to the insurer under such circumstances. If the insured introduces evidence to rebut the presumption of prejudice, the insurer is then required to present specific facts demonstrating prejudice in order to negate coverage. While Colorado courts have applied this notice-prejudice rule in the context of first-party uninsured motorist coverage and in situations where an insured provided untimely notice of a claim, this is the first time the rule has been applied to a liability policy where an insured violated a provision prohibiting it from making voluntary payments or settling a case without the carrier’s knowledge or authorization.

This development is not entirely surprising, given that Colorado courts have already imposed it under analogous circumstances. See Friedland v. Travelers Indemn. Co., 105 P.3d 639, 643 (Colo. 2005) (untimely notice under a liability policy); Lauric v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 209 P.3d 190,193 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009) (violation of a consent to settle clause under an uninsured motorist policy). Nevertheless, allowing an insured to overcome the presumption of prejudice for a pre-suit settlement of which a liability carrier had no knowledge broadens the rule. This is because settlement of a liability claim against an insured, unlike a settlement of an insured’s affirmative claims against a tortfeasor in the uninsured motorist arena, can impose indemnity obligations on carriers without their ability to assess risk and potential exposure. Indeed, carriers may now be concerned that an insured and a claimant will negotiate inflated settlements without the carrier’s knowledge, based solely on the claimant’s assessment of liability and calculation of damages because there is less risk that the carrier will ultimately be allowed to deny a claim based solely on the basis that it did not consent to the settlement.

Bad Faith Damages
Despite this development, which could potentially have an adverse impact on insurers, Stresscon also applied reasoning that restricts the bad faith damages insureds may recover under C.R.S. § 10-3-1116(1). This statute allows for an award of double damages if an insured proves its carrier’s denial or delay of the payment of insurance benefits was unreasonable. The court essentially eliminated these statutory double damages in situations where the applicable policies’ “other insurance” clauses limit recovery to the amount of the loss, even where there is a finding of unreasonable delay or denial.

This new limitation may be a significant ruling for cases where an insured has already been made whole by other carriers, particularly in additional insured cases where a general contractor seeks to recover from its subcontractors’ policies on a joint and several basis. In the event the general contractor has already been made whole by its own or other carriers’ policies (and assuming the policies contain similar “other insurance” provisions), the covered loss is not doubled. For example, if an additional insured claims one carrier delayed payment of defense costs in the amount of $500,000, the additional insured would only be entitled to the $500,000 penalty, not $500,000 x 2. This analysis could have considerable impact on risk assessment, settlement negotiations and damages awards because plaintiffs’ lawyers have consistently used the threat of double damages to negotiate more lucrative settlements.

Unresolved Issue
Another issue the Stresscon trial court had resolved in the insured’s favor was a finding that liability policies give rise to “first-party” policy rights such that liability carriers are subject to the double damages and attorney’s fees imposed by C.R.S. §§ 10-3-1115 and 1116 for an unreasonable withholding of policy benefits. A federal district court judge ruled to the contrary in New Salida Ditch Co. v. United Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 WL 5126498 (unpublished opinion). Due to these conflicting opinions and lack of a definitive interpretation of the statutes by a Colorado court, Travelers initially appealed the trial court’s conclusion that these statutes apply to liability policies. Obviously, the defense bar was eager to see how the state appellate court would resolve this question. Yet, Travelers withdrew its appeal of this issue. Thus, whether C.R.S. §§ 10-3-1115 and 1116 apply to liability policies has yet to be resolved by a Colorado appellate court.

On balance, the Stresscon decision provided both encouraging and troubling points for insurance carriers and insureds. Application of the notice-prejudice rule to settlements made in violation of a consent-to-settle clause may give insureds and claimants the incentive to enter into settlements that could prove costly to insurers. On the other hand, the court’s use of “other insurance” clauses as an offset against double damages diminishes the potential exposure and correlating bargaining power for overstated settlements of such claims. Of course, this decision is not the last word on these issues as we anticipate both sides will appeal them to the Colorado Supreme Court.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Elser | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Wilson Elser

Wilson Elser on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.