Manatt’s Amicus Briefs Help Protect LGBT Youth From Abusive “Gay Conversion” Therapy

by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

In a highly publicized, published opinion, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently upheld California’s SB 1172, the first law in the United States to bar licensed mental health providers from treating patients under the age of 18 with what has been interchangeably referred to as reparative therapy, gay conversion therapy, and sexual orientation change efforts (“SOCE”). Pickup v. Brown, No. 12-17681 (9th Cir. Aug. 29, 2013). SB 1172 gives California’s mental health providers who wish to perform SOCE a basic choice: wait until the “patient” becomes an adult or be subject to discipline for unprofessional conduct.

After the law’s enactment, two groups of plaintiffs quickly filed suits challenging the law and seeking to enjoin its enforcement on First Amendment and other constitutional grounds. In the first action, Welch v. Brown (E.D. Cal., filed Oct. 1, 2012), one federal judge held that SB 1172 is subject to strict scrutiny because it constitutes content and viewpoint restrictions. The court then granted preliminary relief on the grounds that SB 1172 was unlikely to survive heightened scrutiny. In the second action, Pickup v. Brown (E.D. Cal., filed Oct. 4, 2012), a different judge went in the other direction. Reasoning that SB 1172 bars treatment and not discussions of treatment, the court applied rational basis review. Given the lower level of scrutiny, the court denied preliminary relief because the plaintiffs were unlikely to show that SB 1172 violates SOCE practitioners’ speech rights. The Welch and Pickup orders resulted in two appeals to the Ninth Circuit, which were consolidated.

In conjunction with Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Manatt attorneys Brad Seiling, Ben Shatz, and J.J. Rodriguez defended the law with two amicus briefs (one in each case) on behalf of 12 regional and national organizations that work with LGBT youth. Manatt argued that SB 1172 protects children and their families from the lifelong harms associated with “reparative” or “ex-gay therapy.” Manatt and Lambda advanced compelling firsthand accounts from reparative therapy survivors to highlight the harms that SB 1172 seeks to prevent. Those accounts revealed that survivors experience heightened rates of suicide and homelessness, schisms with their families, long-term mental health problems, and an aversion to therapy throughout their lives.

Manatt also advanced historical evidence about SOCE in California to establish that the state promoted, mandated, or was complicit in efforts to change the sexual orientation of minors. Manatt’s briefs traced the evolution of antihomosexuality statutes in California from (1) outright criminalization, to (2) law enforcement and judicial tactics to overcome loopholes in antihomosexuality laws, to (3) the state-sponsored quest for a “cure.” Given that history, including particularly egregious practices used on minors, Manatt argued that SB 1172 is a wholly appropriate exercise of the state’s police power to safeguard LGBT youth.

The Ninth Circuit agreed and affirmed its order denying preliminary relief in Pickup, while reversing the order granting preliminary relief in Welch. Writing for the unanimous panel, also consisting of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and Judge Morgan Christen, Judge Susan Graber explained that when SB 1172 was enacted, “the overwhelming consensus was that SOCE was harmful and ineffective. On this record, [the panel had] no trouble concluding that the legislature acted rationally by relying on that consensus.” In reaching its conclusion, the court cited the type of anecdotal evidence that Manatt presented in its briefs and provided a laundry list of past SOCE, including many of the same methods cited by Manatt.

The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Pickup is hardly the last word on SOCE. California’s SB 1172 motivated New Jersey’s Assembly Bill 3371, which seeks to protect “minors from attempts to change their sexual orientation.” New Jersey’s governor signed the bill into law just before the Pickup opinion was issued. Like in California, suit was almost immediately filed in federal court. King v. Christie, No. 3:13-cv-05038-FLW-LHG (D.N.J., filed Aug. 22, 2013). At least three other states are also considering following California’s lead. See Pa. SB 872 (an Act prohibiting mental health professionals from engaging in sexual orientation change efforts with an individual under 18 years of age); Wash. HB 1882 (reviewing sexual orientation change efforts for children); Mass. Bill H.154 (an Act relative to abusive practices to change sexual orientation and gender identity in minors).

Not surprisingly, the plaintiffs in both Pickup and Welch have filed petitions for rehearing en banc that highlight the “exceptional importance” of the Ninth Circuit opinion. The petitions also argue that reparative therapy is safe and that the evidence before the Legislature and the panel did not compel a contrary conclusion. To that end, as more states enact statutes like SB 1172, and more courts review those statutes, the type of evidence that Manatt advanced in its briefs will remain an important piece of the discussion.

The clients Manatt and Lambda Legal represented were Children’s Law Center of California; Dependency Legal Group of San Diego; East Bay Children’s Law Offices; Gaylesta; Legal Advocates for Children and Youth; The LGBTQ-Affirmative Therapist Guild of Utah; Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center; Los Angeles Youth Network (LAYN); Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays; Public Counsel; The Trevor Project; and Truth Wins Out.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.