Market Definition Failure Dooms Golf Caddies’ Antitrust Class Action Against PGA Tour

by Proskauer - Minding Your Business
Contact

An antitrust class action lawsuit brought by golf caddies against the Professional Golf Association will not be afforded a mulligan after a federal district court dismissed their complaint with prejudice. A putative class of similarly-situated golf caddies sued PGA Tour, Inc. over the “bibs” that caddies wear during Tour-sponsored golf tournaments. Plaintiffs alleged that, by adopting and implementing a uniform policy that required caddies to wear a bib as a condition of their participation in a Tour event, the Tour violated the Sherman Act and the Lanham Act, misappropriated the caddies’ images and likenesses, breached its contracts with the caddies, was unjustly enriched, engaged in acts of duress and business compulsion, and violated California’s unfair competition law.

As fans of the Tour know, caddies are hired and paid by professional golfers who play on golf tours operated by the Tour. The caddie bibs are the primary part of the caddies’ uniform, as established by the Tour’s uniform policy. The bibs typically display, among other things, the logos of the PGA Tour’s corporate sponsors. The Tour requires the caddies to wear these bibs — a requirement that has existed for decades and is contained in the contracts between each caddy and the Tour.

The suit was originally filed in February 2015. A year later, the District Court judge granted defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims.  Hicks v. PGA Tour, Inc.

The court dismissed the Sherman Act claims for failure to properly allege a relevant antitrust product market that encompassed the product at issue as well as all economic substitutes for the product. Plaintiffs had attempted to distinguish certain forms of advertising to golf fans from others and alleged two relevant product markets: the “Endorsement Market” and the “Live Action Advertising Market.” Id. at 11. The court found that these alleged product markets were “not plausible” and “not natural” — “[t]hey are artificial, contorted to meet [Plaintiffs’] litigation needs.” Id. at 13-14.

The court’s market definition analysis is instructive for defendants seeking to dismiss antitrust claims based on narrow product markets, especially in sports and in advertising. As to the first alleged market in the case — the Endorsement Market — Plaintiffs alleged that “endorsements by pro golfers and caddies displayed during golf tournaments are not reasonably interchangeable with other forms of advertising to golf fans, such as television ads, magazine ads, internet ads, or posters displayed at golf course clubhouses.” Id. at 11-12. The Live Action Advertising Market alleged by Plaintiffs included advertisement opportunities during live tournament play, such as signs on the course and logos on a graphic displayed during play. Id. at 12. Plaintiffs alleged that each of these two categories of advertisement “are unique and not reasonably interchangeable with other forms of advertising to golf fans, because broadcast viewers can fast-forward through commercials, or ignore magazine ads or posters, but cannot readily avoid observing a logo that appears on screen during tournament play.” Id.

The court explained that “it’s not enough to allege that these forms of advertising have differences,” and found that Plaintiffs had not alleged any “facts from which one could plausibly conclude that these different methods of advertising to golf fans are not reasonably interchangeable, such that even if the price of one advertising method went up in a meaningful way, companies would not switch to another method of advertising.” Id. at 13. Notably, the court discounted the effect of DVRs on other forms of advertisement to golf fans. The court explained that “it does not plausibly follow that a price increase in in-play advertisement opportunities would have no effect on the demand for other forms of advertisement to golf fans.” Id. The court noted that the alleged forms of advertisements might be reasonably interchangeable with magazine ads, walls in golf course clubhouses, or any number of other places where advertisements could reach golf fans. Id. at 13-14.

Plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim relied on the absence of bibs in the Tour uniform policy’s silence as to bibs, which Plaintiffs asserted did not allow the Tour to require caddies to wear bibs. The court disagreed, finding that the language in the contracts was susceptible to only one reasonable interpretation when considered in the context of this case because “no reasonable person signing the contract after 2010 could believe he [or she] retained the right not to wear a bib during a tournament.” Id. at 6.

The court also disagreed with Plaintiffs’ alternative assertion that each caddy agreed to this contract language under economic duress because caddies lacked viable alternative employment. Id. at 7. The court found that the doctrine of economic duress did not apply here because there was a long-standing requirement to wear bibs when the caddies entered into the contracts, and because the caddies were not “coerced into the arrangement on the threat of extreme economic hardship.” Id. at 8.

Finally, the court dismissed Plaintiffs’ Lanham Act and “right of publicity” claims because both claims required lack of consent and “the only plausible interpretation of the parties’ agreements is that the caddies consented to the very thing they now complain of — namely, the Tour’s right to make the caddies wear bibs at tournaments and to televise and otherwise accurately depict the caddies participating in those tournaments.” Id. at 9, 14.

One of the key takeaways for antitrust practitioners is that plaintiffs’ alleged market was implausibly narrow because it did not consider all the reasonable alternatives sponsors consider when advertising to golf fans. According to the court, the caddies’ attempt at defining the relevant antitrust market too narrowly was akin to a caddy advising a player on a golf shot without considering all the reasonably interchangeable clubs that could be appropriate for that shot.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer - Minding Your Business | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer - Minding Your Business
Contact
more
less

Proskauer - Minding Your Business on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.