Minnesota Income Tax Residency Law— Recent Developments and Planning Considerations

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP

On April 16, 2014, the Minneapolis Star Tribune published an article by Adam Belz titled, “Minnesota’s wealthy caught in a tight tax net over residency.” The article discussed the Minnesota Department of Revenue’s approach to residency determinations, as well as two recent Minnesota Supreme Court residency decisions. Although the article served as a reminder that the Department of Revenue continues to aggressively pursue residency audits, it provided an incomplete discussion of Minnesota income tax residency law that may have left readers with a mistaken impression of how that law is, and should be, applied. See “Counterpoint” article prepared by our colleague, Mary Streitz, and published by the Star Tribune on April 23, 2014, available here.

To further clarify the points addressed in the Star Tribune piece, this article summarizes Minnesota income tax residency law and discusses the impact of the recent court decisions applying that law. Additionally, this article describes the process of changing domicile and the steps individuals should take if they wish to leave Minnesota and establish domicile in another state.

Current Law

Under current law, a person is treated as a resident for Minnesota income tax purposes if (1) the person is domiciled in Minnesota or (2) the person is domiciled outside of Minnesota but maintains a place of abode in the state and spends in the aggregate at least 183 days of the year in Minnesota. See Minn. Stat. § 290.01, subd. 7.

For purposes of this rule, “domicile” means presence in a place with the intention of making it a permanent home. Domicile is also the place where, whenever a person is absent, the person intends to return. In other words, domicile is the location that serves as the center of a person’s life. Importantly, once a domicile is established, it is presumed to continue until it is proven that (1) the former domicile has been abandoned, and (2) a new domicile has been created.

Minnesota’s income tax regulations list 26 factors that are considered in determining whether a person is domiciled in Minnesota. See Minn. R. 8001.0300, subp. 3, available here. The regulations explicitly state, and Minnesota courts agree, that no one factor, by itself, will determine a person’s domicile. See Minn. R. 8001.0300, subp. 3.

Recent Cases on Domicile

Two recent Minnesota Supreme Court decisions illustrate how Minnesota courts apply the 26 factors to weigh a taxpayer’s facts and circumstances and to determine whether the taxpayer has established domicile in another state.

In Larson v. Commissioner of Revenue, 824 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. 2013), taxpayer William Larson argued that he had changed his domicile from Minnesota to Nevada in 1998 after taking actions to physically relocate to Las Vegas—he purchased and homesteaded a condominium, moved the bulk of his personal belongings, obtained a Nevada driver’s license, registered to vote, registered vehicles and opened a Nevada bank account. Despite these actions, the Minnesota Supreme Court agreed with the Minnesota Tax Court that “the locus” of Mr. Larson’s life remained in Minnesota and therefore Mr. Larson had failed to carry his burden. The court emphasized that, during the tax years at issue, Mr. Larson “owned more property in Minnesota than he did in Nevada, spent more time in Minnesota than he did in Nevada, registered more vehicles in Minnesota than Nevada, and maintained bank accounts and mail delivery in Minnesota.” Id. at 332. Based on the totality of the circumstances, the court was unable to conclude that the center of Mr. Larson’s life was in Nevada.

Similarly, in Mauer v. Commissioner of Revenue, 829 N.W.2d 59 (Minn. 2013), the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the Minnesota Tax Court’s determination that taxpayer Kenneth Mauer did not change his domicile from Minnesota to Florida. Mr. Mauer, an NBA referee who traveled extensively for his job, argued that he had established his domicile in Florida after purchasing a townhome in Fort Myers in July 2003 and taking other formal steps to change his domicile. The Minnesota Supreme Court found that even though Mr. Mauer declared that he changed his domicile in July 2003, the overall facts and circumstances, including his actual behavior, showed otherwise.

The court found it significant that Mr. Mauer continued to call Minnesota his “home” in his travel logs, and he maintained, furnished, and spent significantly more time in his 10,600-square foot home in Minnesota, than he did in his Fort Myers townhome. Id. at 76. The court’s domicile analysis also highlighted that most of Mr. Mauer’s flights began and ended in Minnesota and his Minnesota home contained most of his motor vehicles and personal belongings. Id.

Impact of Recent Cases

The discussion and comments in the April 16, 2014, Star Tribune article may have given the impression that the Larson and Mauer decisions have significantly altered the domicile analysis in Minnesota. In our experience, however, these cases have not materially changed the Department of Revenue’s domicile position or its analysis of the 26 factors. In fact, the courts’ decisions have reinforced the long-standing rule that no one factor is determinative in the domicile analysis and that all relevant facts and circumstances will be considered and weighed.

In particular, although both the trial and appellate courts in Larson noted Mr. Larson’s use of Minnesota professionals after purporting to change his domicile to Nevada, this was merely one of many facts cited by the court, and certainly not the most important one. A taxpayer’s long-distance relationship with established Minnesota advisors should not tip the domicile analysis in the Department of Revenue’s favor.

Although the “location of business relationships and the place where business is transacted” is one of the factors the Department of Revenue considers in its 26-factor analysis, see Minn. R. 8001.0300, subp. 3T, in our experience the Department has generally looked only at a taxpayer’s business relationships that have significant connections with Minnesota and has not focused on a taxpayer’s professional advisors. To clarify any confusion in interpreting this factor, however, a bill is currently pending in the Minnesota legislature, HF 3167, Article 3, Section 8, which provides that neither the Department nor the courts may consider “the location of an individual’s attorneys, certified public accountants, or financial advisors” in determining the individual’s domicile for Minnesota income tax purposes.

Process of Changing Domicile

Contrary to the impression with which one might have been left after reading the Star Tribune article, a person does not need to sever all ties with Minnesota to establish domicile elsewhere. Rather, as the Minnesota Supreme Court noted in Mauer, “there are several well-established, reasonable, and concrete steps that a taxpayer can take in order to establish domicile.” 829 N.W.2d at 76. There are also many individually tailored steps a taxpayer can take to solidify a change of domicile. Based on our experience with the Department of Revenue, some examples include:

  • Spend more time in the new state than in Minnesota.
  • Begin and end most travel from the new state of residence (or, next best, somewhere other than Minnesota).
  • Don’t maintain a home in Minnesota that is larger and that has more personalized décor than the home in the new state of residence. For example, move important personal belongings to the home in the new state of residence and keep the Minnesota home furnished as more of a seasonal property.
  • Establish real and substantial social and community connections in the new state of residence. Keep a record of activities, especially those that would be unusual if the new state of residence was seasonal, i.e., volunteer work, club and other social network activities, church activities, blood donation, etc.

These are the types of considerations on which the Department of Revenue would focus to develop and analyze the unique set of facts and circumstances that point to the location of a taxpayer’s domicile. Careful and early planning is critically important. Our extensive experience both in advising clients who are contemplating a residency change and in representing taxpayers whose residency change has been challenged has provided us with the insight and knowledge necessary to help our clients establish and defend the strongest residency position possible.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.