Mobile Payment Patent Remains Legal Tender after Alice Challenge

Proskauer - New England IP Blog
Contact

Plaintiff LevelUp brought a patent infringement claim against Relevant, asserting that Relevant’s technology infringes LevelUp’s patent describing a point-of-sale (POS) system that distinguishes between different types of data streams through the use of specific data sequences (or “sentinels”). When a POS terminal receives the first sentinel, the terminal can interrupt its current task to process the transaction data. And when the terminal receives the second sentinel, the terminal recognizes that the transaction data is received and can complete the transaction.

After the Court granted LevelUp’s request for a preliminary injunction, Relevant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that LevelUp’s patent is invalid because it recites ineligible subject matter under the Alice framework. Specifically, Relevant analogized the POS terminal functionality claimed in the LevelUp patent to the use of Morse code with the earliest telegraph systems, and asserted that LevelUp’s recitation of a “POS terminal,” “credential reader,” and “server” in the claims amount to nothing more than ordinary, generic computing technology that is insufficient to confer patent eligibility.

In deciding the question, Judge McConnell walked through the two-step Alice analysis, evaluating: (1) whether the patent claims are directed to an abstract idea; and (2) if so, whether the claims recite an inventive concept sufficient to transform the abstract idea into a patent-eligible application.

For the first step, Judge McConnell concluded that the claims recite an improvement to the POS terminal itself, “by enabling the POS terminal to differentiate between different forms of data streams (e.g., bar codes on an item for purchase and a barcode on a mobile device that operates as a payment method).” The Rhode Island court pointed to the recent Federal Circuit decisions in Enfish (patent relating to a self-referential database model) and Trading Technologies (patent relating to a structured GUI in an electronic trading system) as inventions that similarly improve the functioning of the underlying technology. Because LevelUp’s claims are directed to a specific method for distinguishing between data streams that improves the operation of the POS terminal, Judge McConnell found that the claims were not directed to an abstract idea.

To complete a full analysis of the issue, the Court proceeded to evaluate the patent claims under step two of the Alice test. Here, Judge McConnell rejected Relevant’s contention that the sentinels in the patented technology were akin to the use of Morse code, explaining that the existence of a pre-Internet analog does not automatically render a patent ineligible. Instead, the court concluded that the claimed invention “overcomes unique technological challenges” by providing a POS terminal “that can process multiple data streams at a time through different inputs and stop a lower priority transaction mid-stream.” As such, LevelUp’s patent claims contained an inventive concept sufficient to render them patent-eligible.

Based on the above findings, the Court denied Relevant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Judge McConnell’s decision in this case is a prime example of how the evaluation of early-stage motions to invalidate patents under § 101 has matured since Alice was decided by the Supreme Court. Plaintiffs in such matters can credit the increasing number of Federal Circuit decisions finding claims patent-eligible as providing the lower courts with better guidance on how to navigate these issues.

The case is SCVNGR, Inc. d/b/a LevelUp v. DailyGobble, Inc. d/b/a Relevant, Case No. 1:16-cv-00134-M-LDA, before Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. A copy of the court’s opinion can be found here.

Judge:

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer - New England IP Blog | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer - New England IP Blog
Contact
more
less

Proskauer - New England IP Blog on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.