Narrowing the Gap for the Price-Cost Test: Lessons From Eisai v. Sanofi-Aventis

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact

For companies that rely on price discounting as a sales and marketing tool, navigating antitrust risk can be difficult. Lower prices always benefit customers in the short run, but economic theory creates room for plaintiffs to argue that a subset of discounting practices have long-run anticompetitive effects. While the traditional discount specter is predatory pricing, a range of conditional pricing practices such as loyalty and bundled discounts have received increased antitrust scrutiny. Both FTC and DOJ recently have signaled an interest in examining the competitive impact of conditional discounts.

Originally published in Bloomberg BNA's Antitrust & Trade Regulation Report™ - June 10, 2016.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide