Nevada Privilege Law May Be Inadvertently Waived During Witness Preparation

by Snell & Wilmer
Contact

It is common for a witness to refer to documents when testifying in order to refresh the witnesses’ recollection. NRS 50.125 requires disclosure of any writing used to refresh a witness’ recollection before or while testifying. What happens, however, when a witness is provided documents that are either privileged or protected by the work product doctrine when preparing to testify? NRS 47.020 and NRCP 26(b)(3) guarantee that the work product doctrine and the attorney-client privilege apply at all stages of all proceedings unless “relaxed by a state or procedural rule applicable to the specific situation.” NRS 47.020(1)(a). The Nevada Supreme Court’s recent decision in Las Vegas Sands Corp. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 13 (Feb. 27, 2014), addressed the intersection of NRS 50.125 and Nevada privilege law in an issue of first impression.

In Sands, the district court heard a motion for sanctions related to Sands’ alleged discovery misconduct. During the sanctions hearing, a former attorney for the Sands was cross-examined. During the examination it was revealed that prior to testifying, the attorney had reviewed attorney billing records and emails to refresh his recollection of relevant dates and the timing of events.

Based on this testimony, the party conducting the cross-examination argued that the documents used to refresh the witness’ recollection should be disclosed pursuant to NRS 50.125. NRS 50.125 provides in part:

1. If a witness uses a writing to refresh his or her memory, either before or while testifying, an adverse party is entitled:
(a) To have it produced at the hearing;
(b) To inspect it;
(c) To cross-examine the witness thereon; and
(d) To introduce in evidence those portions which relate to the testimony of the witness for the purpose of affecting the witness’s credibility.

Sands objected, claiming work product doctrine and attorney-client privilege prevented disclosure of the documents notwithstanding NRS 50.125 and that the court must employ a balancing test to determine whether disclosure is in the interests of justice. The district court suggested that the party seeking production file a motion requesting production of the documents. Two days after the hearing, the district court entered an order sanctioning the Sands.

The party that cross-examined the Sands’ counsel filed a motion seeking to compel production of the documents approximately two months after the sanction order was entered. At the subsequent hearing, the district court ordered Sands to produce the documents, but stayed the order pending resolution of the Sands’ application for a writ of prohibition.

The Nevada Supreme Court initially held that NRS 50.125 was ambiguous because the term “writing” could be interpreted to mean any writing, privileged or unprivileged. The Court found the legislative history unhelpful but noted that the legislators who wrote Nevada’s evidence code wanted to promote the search for the truth, and therefore, they attempted to limit exceptions to NRS 50.125. This analysis prompted the Court to disagree with Sands’ position that NRS 50.125 should be read similarly to FRE 612, which gives the federal courts discretion in determining whether a document used to refresh a witness’s recollection should be produced. The Court ultimately held that “NRS 50.125 requires disclosure of any document used to refresh the witness’s recollection before or while testifying, regardless of privilege.”

Despite the Court’s determination that NRS 50.125 mandates disclosure of privileged documents used to refresh a witness’s recollection, the Court granted Sands’ writ and directed the clerk of the court to issue a writ of prohibition ordering the district court to halt the production of the documents. The Court ruled the party was not entitled to the documents because he requested them after the sanctions hearing and NRS 50.125 is a rule of evidence intended to “allow an adverse party to inspect and use the document to test a witness’s credibility at the hearing.” Emphasis added. Moreover, NRS 50.125 is not a rule of discovery. Since the request for production came two months after the hearing and the lower court’s ruling, the Court held that the lower court abused its discretion by ordering production of privileged documents and noted that the lower court’s order improperly turned NRS 50.125 into a rule of discovery.

Sands makes it crystal clear that Nevada courts must require production of documents used by a witness to refresh his or her recollection prior to testifying, even if they are privileged, provided the request is made at the time of the hearing. Every practitioner needs to understand the significance of this ruling when preparing witnesses to give testimony.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Snell & Wilmer | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Snell & Wilmer
Contact
more
less

Snell & Wilmer on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.