New Fed Cannabis Policy Hits California Local Government - Potential Fiscal Impacts and Confusion

by Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Just days after the sale of recreational cannabis became legal in California, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a new policy regarding cannabis-related activities that is causing confusion for local governments — and will likely impact them financially, as well.
 
Many California municipalities have projected revenues from commercial cannabis taxes. The U.S. Department of Justice’s position that cannabis-related activities are still illegal as a federal matter, and not exempt from prosecution, will have a chilling effect on the cannabis industry, which will also harm local governments’ ability to capitalize on projected tax revenues.
 
In addition, the DOJ policy keeps states’ rights in question — furthering the confusion that arises from conflicting laws.
 
The DOJ's new policy rescinds a line of previous policy statements by former Justice Department officials regarding special prosecutorial considerations related to cannabis. Most notably, the rescission applies to the Obama-era policy statement issued by then-Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole. Widely known as the “Cole Memo,” it set forth a number of enforcement priorities that related primarily to preventing the diversion of cannabis grown in compliance with state regulations in states that allow such activities into the black market, and preventing violence associated with cannabis-related activities. While the Cole Memo was merely a policy statement that did not carry the force of law, it was the best indication of the federal government’s position on cannabis enforcement issues.
 
The DOJ's policy provides that the previous policy statements, including the Cole Memo, undermined the rule of law and references a number of federal statutes that criminalize cannabis-related activities.
 
Sessions’ position in the new policy is not entirely surprising, given that he has been vocal and committed to his position that cannabis is a dangerous substance that is comparable to heroin in potency and links to violence. However, the position differs from what President Trump indicated was his position while on the campaign trail.
 
This new policy statement signals the Justice Department’s commitment to enforcing federal statutes that currently criminalize cannabis-related activities and raises concerns about states’ rights.
 
Through Proposition 64 on the November 2016 ballot, California became one of eight states that legalized cannabis for recreational use. Hours after the issuance of the new policy statement, California officials, including California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and Bureau of Cannabis Control Chief Executive Lori Ajax, renewed their commitment to defend California’s decision to regulate rather than criminalize cannabis, and to protect the State’s regulatory framework that permits both medicinal and recreational cannabis.
 
Notably, the new policy statement provides no shelter for medical cannabis, which many think should be treated differently from adult-use cannabis. Medical cannabis appears to be more palpable to some states and communities, with legalization in 29 states.
 
Since 2014, the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment (now titled the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment) has prevented the Justice Department from using federal funds to prosecute medical cannabis-related activities that were conducted in compliance with state regulations in states that allowed such activities. The amendment has been attached to budget bills and must be passed annually. Since the end of last year, a pair of stopgap spending bills has kept the amendment alive, but it is set to expire on Jan. 19. Unless Congress is able to pass the amendment again, the restriction on the use of federal funds to prosecute medical cannabis uses will end.
 
Specifically, the new policy statement allows U.S. attorneys to use their discretion to determine whether and how much federal resources to expend on anti-cannabis efforts.
 
This further underscores the conflict between federal and state law regarding the legality of cannabis. Confusion already exists due to the lack of uniformity in enforcement between states. The new policy statement may result in enforcement inconsistences within the State — adding another layer of confusion. For example, U.S. attorneys in the Central District of California could take a more or less lenient stance than U.S. attorneys in the Northern District of California.
 
The results of the new policy will affect both public entities and industry-side financial interests. As to public entities, California has projected $1 billion in taxes from retail cannabis and many local jurisdictions have similar tax revenue expectations related to the taxation of commercial cannabis-related activities. As for industry-side interests, since the announcement, some publicly traded cannabis companies’ stock have taken significant hits in value. Any chilling effects on the industry could reverberate and harm government authorities’ ability to capitalize on projected tax revenue expectations.
 
As noted above, this is a turbulent area of the law with many moving parts. This shift in the federal government’s stance will further complicate the legal landscape. BB&K attorneys and advocates in California and in Washington, D.C. are exploring advocacy avenues to protect municipalities as the DOJ policy changes are implemented.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact
more
less

Best Best & Krieger LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.