Ninth Circuit Raises The Bar For Plaintiffs Seeking Trademark Injunctions

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management Inc.1 increases the burden on trademark plaintiffs seeking preliminary injunctions. The case is the first decision from a federal appeals court to hold clearly that the 2006 Supreme Court patent case eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C2 applies in trademark cases to eliminate the long-established rule that a plaintiff demonstrating a likelihood of trademark confusion is thereby entitled to a presumption that it will suffer irreparable harm. The case is also noteworthy for setting a high and arguably ambiguous standard for the amount and type of evidence necessary, in the absence of the jettisoned presumption, to establish irreparable harm.


eBay held that, in patent cases, a permanent injunction should not “automatically follow” an infringement determination, and should be awarded only after consideration of “the four-factor test historically employed by courts of equity.”3 Since the decision was issued seven years ago, the question of whether and how eBay applied in the trademark law context has been the subject of much academic debate and conflicting federal district court decisions.

Some commentators have argued that eBay should not affect the presumption of irreparable harm in trademark cases. They reason that a rebuttable presumption as to one of the is not the same as a general rule, struck down in eBay, that an injunction will automatically issue.4 A plaintiff still needs to overcome a defendant’s effort to rebut the presumption, and also satisfy the other traditional factors by showing that legal remedies such as monetary damages would be inadequate compensation (second factor), that the balance of hardships is in its favor (third factor), and that the public interest would not be harmed by the injunction (fourth factor).

It is also urged that infringement of a trademark is simply different from patent or copyright infringement. Trademark infringement creates confusion among consumers and means that the plaintiff does not have control over its own reputation. In addition, injury from trademark infringement is notoriously difficult to prove.5 Defendants are not likely to volunteer customers they obtained through confusion with the plaintiff, and plaintiffs are not likely to learn from their own lost customers the reasons why they did not provide business. Because the motivations or mistakes of lost customers are less relevant in patent and copyright cases, the difficulty of such proof is reduced. As one commentator put it, “the harm from trademark infringement is fundamentally irreparable.”6

Those arguing that the presumption should not survive eBay assert that the Supreme Court’s intent was to strike down all “formulaic assumptions” in considering injunction requests.7 Particularly since the other factors in the test are rarely given much weight, a presumption on the irreparable harm factor has, effectively, often led to the automatic injunctions that eBay prohibited.8 This side also argues that, as trademark rights have been effectively broadened through developments such as protection against “initial interest confusion,” trademark infringement is no longer necessarily different, in any relevant way, from other types of property rights violations.9 It is no longer valid to presume, if it ever has been, that all trademark infringement results in irreparable harm.

The debate was reignited by the Supreme Court’s decision in Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.10 That 2008 decision overturned a generally-applicable Ninth Circuit rule that “when a plaintiff demonstrates a strong likelihood of prevailing on the merits, a preliminary injunction may be entered based only on a ‘possibility’ of irreparable harm.” The correct standard, Chief Justice Roberts’ decision held instead, “requires plaintiffs seeking preliminary relief to demonstrate that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction.”11 Although Winter is not an intellectual property case, and does not mention eBay, it has raised further questions about whether the trademark law presumption is consistent with Supreme Court mandates.12

Federal courts have inconsistently applied eBay in the trademark context, both before and after Winter. Several federal appeals courts have essentially dodged the question. “We have no need to decide whether a court may presume irreparable injury upon finding a likelihood of confusion in a trademark case, a difficult question considering the Supreme Court's opinion in eBay,” the Fifth Circuit held in a 2008 decision. “The facts of this case support a finding of a substantial threat of irreparable injury.”13 Other appeals courts have taken similar approaches.14

Left without definitive guidance, federal district courts have come to widely varying conclusions. Many continue to apply the presumption without considering whether it might no longer be valid.15 Others have found explicitly that the Supreme Court decisions should not affect the presumption. The Middle District of North Carolina, for example, found that “there are distinctions between copyright and patent infringement actions, where monetary damages are often central, and trademark infringement, where confusion may have long-lasting effects.”16 A Southern District of New York decision distinguished eBay in one sentence, reasoning that that case “involved permanent injunctions issued under the Patent Act,” so that the presumption still stood in the Second Circuit for preliminary injunctions in trademark cases.17

The district courts of the Ninth Circuit, prior to Herb Reed, were particularly divided. A Central District of California court noted that Winter required that it issue a preliminary injunction only “if the moving party shows that irreparable injury is likely,” but nonetheless held, absent a ruling specifically overturning the rule in trademark cases, that it would continue to presume such injury was likely.18 Another Central District of California case, however, considering the impact of both Winter and eBay, found eBay “more pertinent,” and refused to presume irreparable injury.19 Other district courts in the Ninth Circuit considered it essentially self-evident that Winter had eliminated the presumption in trademark law, without even citing eBay.20

Probably more common than district court decisions finding that the presumption no longer applies have been decisions indicating that such a presumption exists but then implicitly or explicitly acknowledging some degree of uncertainty by citing evidence that, in any case, is held to establish irreparable harm.21 Many such cases have effectively carried the essence of the presumption forward, even as they question its viability. The Fifth Circuit found a sufficient showing of likely irreparable harm due to “possible injury to” plaintiff’s goodwill “in the event that” defendant used its confusingly similar mark with “inferior or inappropriate technology and services.”22 A federal district court in Texas similarly found irreparable harm because the infringement a trademark owner had shown made it “likely” that it would suffer an erosion of its trademark rights and loss of control over how its mark is used.23 Another court found irreparable injury “even absent the presumption,” because the defendant’s actions led consumers to believe it was associated with the plaintiff and diminished the value of the plaintiff’s trademark.24 Since the same could be said in almost any case where a likelihood of confusion has been demonstrated, the effect is to hold that the nature of trademark infringement, with its impact on reputation and goodwill, means that proof of irreparable harm is not difficult to establish whether or not any presumption exists.

The Herb Reed Decision

Into this context comes Herb Reed, a dispute over use of THE PLATTERS, the trademark and name of the pop music group that first achieved fame in the 1950s.25 A company connected to the estate of Herb Reed, an original member of the group, sued a promoter who used the mark with his own musical group, winning a preliminary injunction in a Nevada federal district court.26

In reversing the preliminary injunction, the Ninth Circuit held that the presumption of irreparable harm did not survive eBay and Winter. The Supreme Court’s determination in eBay that “[n]othing in the Patent Act indicates that Congress intended” a departure from “traditional principles of equity” applies with equal force to trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, the Ninth Circuit reasoned, pointing out that “[b]oth statutes provide that injunctions may be granted in accordance with 'the principles of equity.'”27

The Ninth Circuit observed that Winter “underscored the requirement that the plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction ‘demonstrate that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction.’”28 The Ninth Circuit held that “Winter’s admonition that irreparable harm must be shown to be likely in the absence of a preliminary injunction also forecloses the presumption of irreparable harm here.”

At just two paragraphs, the court’s analysis of why the presumption is foreclosed by eBay and Winter is surprisingly short. The court does not analyze the contrary arguments that have been put forth, such as that trademarks are different in kind from other forms of intellectual property, so that trademark infringement is inherently irreparable.

It also indicates that it is not taking an unprecedented step. “We now join other circuits,” the decision says, “in holding that the eBay principle—that a plaintiff must establish irreparable harm—applies to a preliminary injunction in a trademark infringement case.”29 But the two cases the Ninth Circuit cites do not say that the presumption of irreparable harm is no longer valid. In fact, the Eleventh Circuit case North American Medical Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc. states unequivocally that it was not making any ruling on that issue.30 The Sixth Circuit decision in Audi AG v. D'Amato involved a permanent injunction and, while it included no clear statement on the viability of the presumption,31 its cursory application of the eBay factors to the trademark infringement facts at issue led the treatise writer J. Thomas McCarthy to conclude that it was, in fact, applying the presumption.32

The Ninth Circuit also downplays the step it takes in Herb Reed by stating that it had already held, in a 2006 case, that eBay eliminates the presumption of irreparable harm in the trademark permanent injunction context, implying that extending that rule to preliminary injunctions is a small step.33 But the case it cites makes no mention of the presumption, and its brief analysis of the decision granting the injunction does not seem inconsistent with the presumption.34 Whether it acknowledges the fact or not, the Ninth Circuit’s decision does appear to break new ground.

Herb Reed is also noteworthy for rejecting the approach that has emerged in some decisions since eBay and Winter of declining to presume irreparable harm, but nonetheless treating infringement of a trademark as being particularly likely to lead to irreparable harm, and therefore requiring minimal evidence, beyond the evidence of the infringement itself.35

The district court in Herb Reed had recognized that the continued viability of the presumption was in doubt and did not give the plaintiff the benefit of that presumption.36 It nonetheless found that irreparable harm was likely from damage to Reed’s reputation and a loss of goodwill among fans.37 It noted that other courts considering claims by Reed against different parties using the THE PLATTERS mark had made similar determinations.38

But the Ninth Circuit holds that the district court improperly relied on “unsupported and conclusory statements regarding harm that [plaintiff] might suffer” and in doing so abused its discretion.39 “The practical effect of the district court's conclusions,” the appeals court holds, “which included no factual findings, is to reinsert the now rejected presumption of irreparable harm based solely on a strong case of trademark infringement.40 The appeals court conducted its own review of the record and found that the strongest evidence of irreparable harm, “albeit evidence not cited by the district court, is an email from a potential customer complaining [to defendant] that the customer wanted Herb Reed's band rather than another tribute band.”41 But, the Ninth Circuit writes, “[t]his evidence… simply underscores customer confusion, not irreparable harm.”42

The question of what evidence might meet the standard is left open. The court writes only that, “[t]hose seeking injunctive relief must proffer evidence sufficient to establish a likelihood of irreparable harm,” and offers that “[e]vidence of loss of control over business reputation and damage to goodwill could constitute irreparable harm.”43

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.