Ninth Circuit rejects class action settlement, clarifies standards for cy pres remedies and plaintiff counsel's attorneys' fees

by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

In the recently published decision Dennis v. Kellogg Company, No. 11-55674, 2012 WL 2870128 (9th Cir. July 13, 2012), the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s approval of a purported $10.64 million settlement between defendant Kellogg and a class of consumers alleging false advertising. The Ninth Circuit rejected the settlement for three reasons: (1) the District Court did not apply the correct legal standard in evaluating the proposed cy pres charities that were to be the recipients of the settlement funds, and thereby abused its discretion; (2) the settlement failed to name the charities that would receive cy pres donations; and (3) the District Court’s award of $2 million in attorneys’ fees, the maximum amount Kellogg had agreed not to oppose, was excessive.

In 2009, a consumer filed a complaint claiming that Kellogg falsely marketed Frosted MiniWheats cereal as scientifically proven to increase children’s cognitive functions. In 2010, after little litigation, plaintiff’s counsel, counsel for a prospective plaintiff, and Kellogg’s attorneys reached a settlement. Among the terms of the eventual settlement, Kellogg agreed to establish a $2.75 million fund for distribution to class members on a claims-made basis. Class members submitting claims would receive $5 per box of cereal purchased, up to a maximum of $15. Any remaining funds would be donated to charitable organizations whose goal was to “feed the indigent.” These charities would be selected by the parties and approved by the court in accordance with the cy pres doctrine, which allows unclaimed portions of class action settlements to be donated to a charity that serves class members’ interests. In addition, Kellogg agreed to distribute another $5.5 million “worth” in Kellogg foods to charities that feed the poor. Lastly, Kellogg also agreed to pay class attorneys’ fees and costs of an amount not to exceed $2 million.

Two class members objected to the settlement, contending that the settlement did not comply with the cy pres doctrine and that the proposed attorneys’ fee award was excessive. The District Court for the Southern District of California approved the settlement over the two class members’ objections, including the full amount of attorneys’ fees sought by plaintiff counsel. Class objectors appealed, contending that the District Court abused its discretion in approving the settlement.

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court, holding that the settlement failed to meet the “fair, reasonable, and adequate” threshold for approval under Rule 23(e)(2), for three reasons – the settlement (1) incorrectly applied the cy pres doctrine, (2) failed to identify with particularity the charities that would receive donations as a result of the settlement, and (3) awarded excessive attorneys’ fees to plaintiff counsel. In reviewing the District Court’s approval of the settlement, the Ninth Circuit applied a “higher standard of fairness” and engaged in “a more probing inquiry,” because class counsel had negotiated a settlement agreement before the class had been certified.

First, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the District Court had not applied the correct legal standard governing cy pres charitable donations. Under the cy pres doctrine, donations may be awarded in lieu of distribution of monetary relief to class members, but the award must be guided by the interests of such class members and the underlying claims in the case. The settlement was deficient, the Court held, because the subject of the lawsuit was false advertising, not feeding the indigent. To fulfill the goals of the cy pres doctrine, the settlement should have been made “not to charities that feed the needy, but organizations dedicated to protecting consumers from, or redressing injuries caused by, false advertising.”

A second ground for rejecting the settlement, the Court concluded, was the parties’ failure either to name the recipient charities or to specify how the value of the $5.5 million in donated food would be measured.

Finally, the settlement was deficient because it would result in excessive attorneys’ fees. The Court evaluated the $2 million in attorneys’ fees using two common methods: a “percentage of the fund” analysis and the lodestar method. Under the percentage method, the Court calculated the fees as a percentage of the common fund and arrived at 19 percent when the $5.5 million cy pres distribution was included. The Ninth Circuit has established 25 percent as a benchmark for reasonable attorneys’ fees. However, the Court questioned the 19 percent figure in this case, noting that counsel for the parties had not adequately explained how they had measured the value of the cy pres distribution portion of the common fund. When the cy pres portion was excluded, the fees amounted to 38.9% of the monetary relief available to the settlement class, a number the Court considered “extremely generous.”

As a cross-check, the Court used the lodestar method, which involves multiplying the number of hours reasonably expended by a reasonable hourly rate, sometimes employing a multiplier. The Court determined that the $2 million in attorneys’ fees divided by the 944.5 hours counsel worked on the case resulted in a $2,100 hourly rate. Such fees were “impermissibly high considering what the defective settlement provides the class.”

In the wake of Dennis v. Kellogg, counsel drafting settlements including cy pres provisions would be well-advised to assess whether the charities chosen have a sufficient nexus to the facts alleged in the complaint. Dennis v. Kellogg also signals that courts in the Ninth Circuit are likely to carefully assess proposed attorneys’ fee awards, especially with settlements reached before significant litigation has taken place. Finally, as to any in-kind benefits provided in connection with the settlement, counsel should be prepared to support with evidence how the valuation of such benefits was derived.


Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.