NLRB decision reverts Trump Board independent contractor test to Obama-era multi-factor test

Hogan Lovells
Contact

Hogan Lovells

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has just weighed in on independent contractors – and has overturned the Trump-era standard in favor of the more complex Obama-era standard. In The Atlantic Opera, 372 NLRB 95 (2023), the NLRB found that makeup artists, wig artists, and hairstylists were improperly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. These workers contracted with the Atlanta Opera during the spring and fall seasons, and the Board held that they were in fact employees, as they did not render services as part of an independent business.


In 2014, the NLRB established a multi-factor test in FedEx Home Delivery, 361 NLRB No. 610 (2014) (FedEx II) based on its existing common law agency approach. Under this test, the following factors were weighed, with no one factor being decisive:

  1. Who controls the details of the work;

  2. Whether the work performed a distinct occupation or business;

  3. Whether the work being performed typically done under the supervision of an employer;

  4. Whether the work requires special skill;

  5. Who supplies the tools or equipment;

  6. The length of the engagement;

  7. Whether compensation is based on time spent or completion of a job;

  8. Whether the employer is in the business of work that is performed;

  9. Whether the parties believe they have created an independent contractor relationship; and

  10. Whether the employer is in business.

In SuperShuttle DFW, Inc., 367 NLRB No. 75 (2019), the Trump Board held that entrepreneurial opportunity for gain or loss is the primary factor (animating principle), analyzed under factor #2, of the independent contractor test. Although other enumerated factors, as well as some non-enumerated factors, were still maintained in the court's analysis, entrepreneurial opportunity for gain and loss became all but decisive.

The NLRB's June 13 decision in The Atlanta Opera "reaffirm[ed] the Board’s commitment to the core common-law principles that the Supreme Court has determined should guide the Board’s consideration of questions involving employee status," said NLRB Chairman Lauren McFerran. Entrepreneurial opportunity for gain and loss remains a factor, but without any special weight to it, reestablishing the Obama Board standard. No one factor will be decisive, and the Board will consider all factors when determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor, aligning with U.S. Supreme Court precedent (United Insurance, 390 U.S. 254 (1968)) holding “all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive.”

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hogan Lovells | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hogan Lovells
Contact
more
less

Hogan Lovells on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide