No Knowledge, but Hints of Omissions in the Allianz FCPA Settlement

by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact

On December 17, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced a settlement under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) with Allianz SE (“Allianz”), the insurance company based in Germany, resulting in $5.3 million in civil penalties and more than $7 million in disgorgement and interest.  The settlement stemmed from a two-year investigation into allegations that an Allianz subsidiary paid bribes to government officials in Indonesia over a seven-year period and violated the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions.  The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) started its own investigation into potential criminal liability for Allianz, but closed its case in 2011 with a declination letter, an event that was reported in the Wall Street Journal.

According to the SEC order, Allianz had 295 insurance contracts on large government projects that it obtained by making approximately $650,000 in improper payments to Indonesian officials between 2001 and 2008. The contracts allegedly resulted in more than $5 million in profit. In addition to charging that the payments were disguised in company invoices as commission payments for third-party agents, the SEC emphasized that Allianz discovered, but did not stop, the alleged bribes.

First, payments were discovered in 2005 through an internal audit but continued to be made thereafter.  Second, in 2009, after a whistleblower’s complaint to the company’s external auditor prompted a third-party investigation Allianz failed to report the ongoing violations to the SEC.  Finally, after receiving an anonymous complaint in 2010, the Commission launched its own investigation, and Allianz cooperated.

Although the settlement amount is relatively small, it is the first major FCPA settlement since the SEC and the DOJ published “FCPA: A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” (“the Resource Guide”).  As such, the Allianz case provides some insight into two issues addressed in the Resource Guide: the requirements for corporate mens rea and the elements of an effective compliance program.

As we have written previously, the standards of intent are different for corporate and individual criminal liability under the FCPA.  An added wrinkle highlighted by the Allianz settlement is that, in the civil context, the SEC’s books and records and internal controls provisions have no scienter requirement whatsoever.  In the Allianz case, the SEC took the unusual step of explicitly noting the lack of a scienter requirement in its order, stating “Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act does not require that the amounts involved be ‘material,’ nor is it necessary to prove ‘scienter’ under its provisions” or under the provisions of Section 13(b)(2)(B) (internal citations omitted).  Although the declination does not state why the DOM closed its criminal investigation, it seems possible, particularly given the wording of the SEC order, that an absence of scienter may have contributed to the declination.

And yet, the SEC settlement not only implies that Allianz had some corporate knowledge of the improper payments, but it seems that knowledge may have been a factor contributing to the SEC’s decision to bring an enforcement action and in the settlement amount.  At least as early as 2005, the company arguably was aware of payments to consultants, since the company’s own audit disclosed the payments. That knowledge was reinforced by the 2009 internal whistleblower case, which resulted in a third-party audit.  Although the SEC provisions do not contain a scienter requirement (and thus the SEC would not need to prove that the corporation had the level of knowledge required under the criminal FCPA provisions), the alleged failure to  follow through on discovery of potential issues by implementing changes to business practices forms the basis for the internal controls charge.  In the absence of an actual corporate knowledge requirement about what happens after remedial measures are taken, what is left for internal controls charges could be called an effects test: if your company has discovered a potential violation, did your compliance program fix the problem, or not?

This point brings us back to what makes an FCPA compliance program work.  The fact that Allianz conducted an audit or followed up on whistleblower allegations on two separate occasions did not extinguish its FCPA obligations.  In 2005, Allianz directed its subsidiary to stop making the newly-discovered improper payments, but “no additional steps were taken.”  In 2009, upon discovering that the subsidiary had continued to pay bribes to government officials, Allianz conducted an internal investigation.  The SEC order does not detail the outcome of that investigation beyond stating that Allianz failed to report the conduct to the SEC. But one might infer from changes Allianz made to its compliance program after the SEC began its investigation in 2010 that similar actions were not taken after the 2009 audit.

Notably, in another internal controls case filed this month against Eli Lilly and Company, the SEC stated that Eli Lilly’s reliance on assurances and information in paperwork by intermediaries that allegedly paid bribes was inadequate diligence, and Eli Lilly should have conducted its own independent verification.

The Allianz settlement thus stresses the need not only for implementing compliance programs and corrective actions, but for testing their effectiveness as well.  Ostensibly, as the Resource Guide points out, well designed measures taken in good faith to fix a discovered FCPA problem could be enough to avoid charges in some circumstances.  How close Allianz came to meeting that standard is hard to tell from details given in the SEC Order.  But follow up may make the program work better, and thus be less susceptible to second-guessing by the SEC.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact
more
less

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.