Orrick's Financial Industry Week In Review - September 17, 2012

by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Financial Industry Developments


FHFA, Fannie and Freddie Launch Representation and Warranty Framework

On September 11, the FHFA announced that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are launching a new representation and warranty framework for conventional loans sold or delivered on or after January 1, 2013.  The framework’s objective is to clarify lenders’ repurchase exposure and liability on future deliveries.  Under the new framework: (i) lenders will be relieved of some repurchase obligations for loans that meet specific payment requirements; (ii) HARP loans will be eligible for representation and warranty relief after 12 months’ of acceptable payment history; (iii) information about exclusions from representation and warranty relief will be detailed; and (iv) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will make available for lenders a range of tools to improve loan quality.  FHFA Release.

First Winning Bidder Announced for FHFA REO Pilot Initiative

On September 10, the FHFA announced that Pacifica Companies, LLC has purchased 699 Fannie Mae properties in Florida as part of the REO pilot initiative.  The FHFA will announce the winning investors for properties in other areas upon closing of the transactions in the coming weeks.  FHFA Release.

CFTC Seeks Public Comment on ICE Clear Europe Request about Futures

On September 11, the CFTC requested public comment on a petition from ICE Clear Europe Limited for an order pursuant to Section 4d(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act which would permit ICE Clear Europe and its clearing members that are registered futures commission merchants to: (i) commingle in a futures customer account positions in futures and options, and foreign futures and foreign options, and related customer money, securities and property; and (ii) portfolio margin such futures and options, and foreign futures and foreign options, in the futures customer account.  Comments should be submitted by September 25.  CFTC Release.

CFTC Reponses to Questions on Timing of Swap Dealer Registration Rules

On September 10, the CFTC responded to questions on the timing of when entities will be required to register as swap dealers.  The CFTC issued FAQs to help market participants better understand the requirements and timing of the rules.  CFTC Release.

Rating Agency Developments


On September 13, Fitch updated its global rental fleet ABS criteria.  Fitch Report.

On September 13, Fitch updated its global criteria for cash flow analysis in CDOsFitch Report.

On September 11, DBRS released its criteria for Canadian structured finance transactions, ABCP, and structured finance hedge counterparties.  DBRS Structured Finance Report.  DBRS ABCP Report.  DBRS Hedge Counterparty Report. 

On September 11, Fitch updated its sovereign rating model.  Fitch Release.  Fitch Report.

On September 10, Fitch updated its covered bond criteria.  Fitch Report. 

Note: Free registration is required for rating agency releases and reports.

Recent Orrick Alerts


German High Frequency Trading Act Potential Implications for HFT Firms and Other Firms Using Automated Trading Strategies

On July 30, the German Ministry of Finance published a discussion draft bill regarding High Frequency Trading for the German financial services sector in the form of an “Act for the Prevention of Risks and the Abuse of High Frequency Trading” (HFTA). The new rules amend various German laws to extend their application to high frequency and algorithmic trading.  Click here to read more.

Ruling No. 1831/12 of the Russian Supreme Arbitrazh Court of June 19, 2012 on Split Jurisdiction Clauses

The ruling, after being delayed for a month, was finally published on September 2 and relates to a split jurisdiction clause of a type that is in common use, for example in loan agreements, and which limits the remedies available to one of the parties.  Click here to read more.

RMBS Litigation


German Bank Sues Goldman Sachs Over $189 Million in RMBS

Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG (DZ Bank) filed a summons with notice in New York State court on September 7, 2012, against several Goldman Sachs entities asserting claims in connection with DZ Bank’s alleged purchase of 9 RMBS for over $189 million.  DZ Bank alleges that Goldman Sachs provided offering materials that misrepresented or omitted material information about, among other things, the underwriting standards used to originate the underlying loans, the statistical characteristics of the loans, and the transfer of the loans to the RMBS trusts.  DZ Bank asserts causes of action for common-law fraud, fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, aiding and abetting fraud, declaratory judgment, and contract claims, including rescission, restitution, and mutual mistake.  DZ Bank seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, and rescission.  Summons.

Prudential Files RMBS Lawsuits Against Goldman Sachs and RBS

On August 21, 2012, several Prudential entities sued several RBS entities in New Jersey State court seeking to recover damages allegedly suffered in connection with over $343 million in RMBS.  Prudential also sued several Goldman Sachs entities in New Jersey State court on August 24, 2012, seeking to recover damages allegedly suffered in connection with over $270 million in RMBS.  In both cases, Prudential alleges that the offering documents for the RMBS at issue contain untrue statements of material fact and omissions concerning the underwriting standards used to originate the underlying loans, the result of the defendants’ pre-closing due diligence, owner-occupancy rates, the process by which appraisals in connection with the underlying loans were performed, the assignment of the loans to the RMBS trusts, and the credit ratings assigned to the RMBS.  In the case against RBS, Prudential also alleges that the offering documents contain untrue statements of material fact and omissions concerning the loans’ LTV and CLTV ratios; in the case against Goldman Sachs, Prudential also alleges that the offering documents contain untrue statements of material fact and omissions concerning exceptions made during the loan underwriting process.  Prudential asserts causes of action for common-law fraud / fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of New Jersey’s civil RICO statute.  Prudential seeks compensatory damages, treble damages in connection with its RICO claim, rescission, attorneys’ fees and costs, and prejudgment interest.  RBS Complaint.  Goldman Sachs Complaint.

NCUA Sues UBS Over $1.1 billion in RMBS Sold to Collapsed Credit Unions

On September 6, 2012, the National Credit Union Administration Board (NCUA) sued UBS in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.  The NCUA filed the suit in its capacity as Liquidating Agent of U.S. Central Federal Credit Union and Western Corporate Federal Credit Union, which collectively are alleged to have purchased over $1.1 billion in RMBS from UBS.  The complaint alleges that the originators of the mortgages collateralized into the RMBS had “systematically abandoned” the underwriting guidelines described in the offering documents.  The NCUA also alleges that the offering documents contained untrue statements of material fact concerning weighted average LTV ratios, the evaluation of the borrowers’ capacity and likelihood to repay the mortgage loans, and the reduced documentation programs used by the originators.  The NCUA asserts claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 25401 and 25501 of the California Corporate Securities Law, and the Kansas Uniform Securities Act.  The NCUA seeks rescission or rescissionary damages or, in the alternative, compensatory damages.  Complaint.

European Financial Industry Developments


Legislative Proposals for an EU Banking Union

On September 12, the European Commission published its legislative proposals to establish a single supervisory mechanism (SSM) for eurozone banks. An accompanying communication sets out the ‘roadmap’ for achieving the banking union.

There are two legislative proposals, both of which the Commission has called on the Council of the EU and the European Parliament to adopt by the end of the year:

  • regulation to create the SSM, which tasks the European Central Bank with prudential regulation policy and provides for non-euro countries to join voluntarily; and
  • a regulation to adapt the existing European Banking Authority Regulation (1093/2010) to ensure the preservation of the integrity of the single market and balanced decision making by the European Banking Authority.

Consultation on Non-EEA National Depositor Preference Regimes

The FSA has published a consultation paper looking at the implications of non-EEA national depositor preference regimes which prioritise the claims of home-country depositors over those of depositors outside the home country if a firm becomes insolvent.

The proposed new FSA rules would prohibit firms from non-EEA  countries that operate such regimes from accepting deposits through a UK branch, unless measures are introduced to eliminate the disadvantage to UK depositors caused by the subordination of their claims in favour of home country depositors.

It is intended that the new rules will be in place by January 2013, with a compliance deadline of January 2015.

Consultation on the Authorisation and Supervision Regimes Proposed under the UK’s New Supervisory Structure

On September 12, the FSA published a consultation paper entitled ‘Regulatory Reform: PRA and FCA regimes relating to aspects of authorisation and supervision’ (CP12/24). CP12/24 relates to the creation of the PRA and the FCA that will, along with the FPC, replace the FSA. The PRA and FCA will each adopt provisions from the FSA Handbook to create two new rulebooks that will come into effect when the new regulators acquire their legal powers; these new rulebooks will replace the current FSA Handbook.

In CP12/24 the FSA is consulting on substantive changes to the FSA Handbook that it proposes to make in order to ensure that sections adopted by the PRA and FCA are in line with their future objectives and functions.

The FSA’s consultation is fairly wide-ranging, but it suggests that firms may wish to focus their comments on the following proposals:

  • the updated wording of prescribed status disclosures under GEN 4;
  • the use of the regulators’ logos under GEN 5;
  • the use of Skilled Persons (SUP 5);
  • the channel for submitting waiver applications (SUP 8);
  • certain updates to the guidance on transfers of insurance business to reflect other recent changes to legislation and current practices (SUP 18); and
  • the chapter on other amendments.

The FSA is inviting firms to comment by December 12.

Global Financial Markets Association Letter Outlining Principles for Financial Benchmarks

On September 7,  the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA) published a letter setting out principles that it proposes to assist in the setting of global financial benchmarks such as LIBOR. The principles outline a set of best practice standards for conducting benchmark price assessments. The principles state that the overall responsibility for the benchmark process lies with the entity or group that develops and issues the benchmark (the “sponsor”). The Principles are grounded in three fundamental sponsor obligations, which GFMA believe should be applied in a manner commensurate with the significance of the benchmark:

  • Governance: A sponsor should ensure that there is an appropriate governance structure for oversight of the benchmark;
  • Benchmark Methodology and Quality: A sponsor should employ sound design standards in devising the benchmark and ongoing processes related to its operations; and

Controls: A sponsor should ensure that there is an appropriate system of controls promoting the efficient and sound operation of the benchmark process and should implement such a system of controls.


Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.