OSHA Issues Revised Enforcement Guidance for Recordingkeeping of COVID-19 Cases

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has adopted a Revised Enforcement Guidance for Recording Cases of COVID-19. Under the OSHA regulations and the revised guidance, most cases of COVID-19 will not be definitively “work-related” and will not be recorded or reported to OSHA.

OSHA is revising its previous enforcement policy for recording cases of coronavirus (Revised Enforcement Guidance for Recording Cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019, May 19, 2020). Under OSHA’s recordkeeping requirements, coronavirus is a potentially recordable illness, and employers are responsible for recording cases of the coronavirus, if the case:

Work related cases that result in an employee fatality must be reported to OSHA by phone or online. Because of the difficulty in determining whether this widespread virus was actually contracted at the worksite, OSHA has stated that it will focus on an employers’ reasonable, good faith efforts in making work-related determinations.

In determining whether an employer has complied with this obligation and made a reasonable determination of work-relatedness, Compliance Officers will consider the following:

  • The reasonableness of the employer’s investigation into work-relatedness.
  •  Employers, especially small employers, should not be expected to undertake extensive medical inquiries, given employee privacy concerns and most employers’ lack of expertise in this area.
  • It is sufficient in most circumstances for the employer, when it learns of an employee’s COVID-19 illness, (1) to ask the employee how they believe they contracted the COVID-19 illness; (2) while respecting employee privacy, discuss with the employee their work and out-of-work activities that may have led to the COVID-19 illness; and (3) review the employee’s work environment for potential SARS-CoV-2 exposure. The review in (3) should be informed by any other instances of workers in that environment contracting COVID-19 illness.

Accordingly, OSHA continues to recognize the difficulty in determining work-relatedness for an illness that exists in the community and may be contracted from numerous sources and will assess employers’ reasonable efforts in making work-related determinations. In making the work-relatedness determination, employers need to consider the effect of numerous safety and health procedures that the employer has implemented to control and minimize the risk of possible infection within the workplace.

The employer’s safety program should be following the guidance of the CDC and OSHA regarding COVID-19. These precautions, when considered individually and collectively, effectively reduce and control the possible risk that the COVID-19 virus will be present and/or transmitted to another worker in the workplace. For example, by ensuring that employees are staying home and not at work when they have symptoms that might be COVID-19 the employer would be eliminating the possibility that a worker who is symptomatic with COVID-19 is at work. Further, by following key safety precautions, such as social distancing and wearing masks and face coverings, the employer is eliminating or significantly reducing the chance that an associate will be in “close contact” with someone who may have COVID-19.

If an employer makes a reasonable and good faith inquiry but cannot determine whether it is more likely than not that exposure in the workplace caused a worker to contract COVID-19, OSHA says that the employer does not need to record the case or to report a hospitalization or fatality.

The employer’s individual work-relatedness reasonable inquiry for each COVID-19 case can be short and focused on whether an employee had close contact with other individuals at work (15 minutes or more of contact, within six feet, without face masks or barriers). Cases are not recordable without close contact at work with a known or suspected COVID-19 case. Such contact is necessary but insufficient by itself, because the probability of transmission is low and there is often an alternative explanation of community transmission.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Seyfarth Shaw LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.